Since 2002, a total of 19 SM-3 missiles have been fired in 16 different test events resulting in 16 intercepts against threat-representative full-size and more challenging subscale unitary and full-size targets with separating warheads. In addition, a modified Aegis BMD/SM-3 system successfully destroyed a malfunctioning U.S. satellite by hitting the satellite in the right spot to negate the hazardous fuel tank at the highest closure rate of any ballistic missile defense technology ever attempted.
Not sure what's the big deal....fake news with fake headlines.
Uhm, whose cleaning up the space debris they just created? A small screw floating around in space can rip through the hull of satellites or space craft. An explosion in space creates millions of tiny space debris particles.
Everyone knows you hit the comments before the article. You and I both know people are going to swarm this post complaining about Fox - but when they CTRL-F "archive" - there it is, they can click it, get the info, done deal. By complaining, you're not helping anyone not click the link, so how is posting that any better?
If you see a Fox article posted, archive it, post the archive link and actually be helpful.
Sigh. I wasn’t complaining. I was wondering what happened to a practice that was common in 2016. This isn’t just about there being no archive link. This is about posters not using archive links. It isn’t a hard concept to grasp. So please stop making excuses.
Now why would the military just happen to publicize this test now?
Did you have to link to Cucks News? I feel dirty for clicking on that.
What isn’t cucked anymore ?
Not sure what's the big deal....fake news with fake headlines.
Now that's a fucking deterrent I can get behind!
Uhm, whose cleaning up the space debris they just created? A small screw floating around in space can rip through the hull of satellites or space craft. An explosion in space creates millions of tiny space debris particles.
Don’t people archive anymore?
If you can take the time to complain about it, you can take the time to archive it.
https://archive.is/rBa66
I’m talking about doing it in the op so no one has to give them clicks at all.
Everyone knows you hit the comments before the article. You and I both know people are going to swarm this post complaining about Fox - but when they CTRL-F "archive" - there it is, they can click it, get the info, done deal. By complaining, you're not helping anyone not click the link, so how is posting that any better?
If you see a Fox article posted, archive it, post the archive link and actually be helpful.
Sigh. I wasn’t complaining. I was wondering what happened to a practice that was common in 2016. This isn’t just about there being no archive link. This is about posters not using archive links. It isn’t a hard concept to grasp. So please stop making excuses.