5310
Comments (113)
sorted by:
121
MrZ211 121 points ago +121 / -0

When pedes suggest newsmax i just ask that they remember all the others who have said one nice thing and then turned on us like Chappelle and Chick-fil-A among others.

44
Nadlers_Belt 44 points ago +46 / -2

Trump Tweets: Watch Newsmax, OANN – Not Fox!

If President Trump approves of Newsmax at this time, then so do I.

33
deleted 33 points ago +33 / -0
13
Chick-fill-eh 13 points ago +14 / -1

So what does that mean for OANN?

44
deleted 44 points ago +44 / -0
13
Dictator_Bob 13 points ago +13 / -0

Exact.

9
unsquishable 9 points ago +9 / -0

He still shares Fox interviews on Twitter. Mind you I find that understandable in the near term because of people like Bartiromo having people on to discuss election fraud.

5
Leonrhodes1993 5 points ago +5 / -0

True I love the President but his human hes not 100% right on everything

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Mooksayshigh 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s sad.

8
2020REBOUND 8 points ago +8 / -0

Apparently some people around Trump wanted to buy it out from the CF donating owner.

That said many of these guys donate to everyone to stay alive to be able to make business. In a way Trump did that too for many years.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
DrDT 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would watch them if they had a livestream. My big reason for watching newsmax is that it is so much easier to type in Newsmaxtv.com -- I dont have a kloud tv account, and I dont feel like giving another tech company any more of my information.

35
malapropcomic 35 points ago +39 / -4

Throwing shade at Newsmax? LOL

67
Sigma [S] 67 points ago +67 / -0

No shade, only facts and a viscious hair whip.

15
malapropcomic 15 points ago +19 / -4

Imagine getting SHADE thrown at you by a lady dressed like a flight attendant. That's some harsh SHADE.

28
2020REBOUND 28 points ago +28 / -0

I like it. Competition.

We need 3-4 Networks that compete. The right side Fox monopoly was bad.

10
Cyphr 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah - all these idiots think "there can be only one". Wrong. We need a bunch of viable alternatives to Faux News. Don't make that same mistake again.

We Want MOAR competitors, not just one.

3
DrDT 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. This. If one has all the power, then they are able to stab us in the back. If they are all fighting to keep our views, then they are forced to stay honest.

6
Pigpenlordofdirt 6 points ago +6 / -0

Exactly

27
Everybody__Lies 27 points ago +27 / -0

I would love to watch OAN, but I either have to upgrade or downgrade my Direct Tv package. Newsmax is available without having to do so.

27
empiretc 27 points ago +27 / -0

OAN should be completely free like newsmax. they would get A LOT more viewers that way.

19
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 19 points ago +19 / -0

Friend, OAN is free through the rest of the year on klowdtv. They have an app as well. Well worth the $5/mo sub though, and you get infowars as a bonus.

2
TyrannyBuster 2 points ago +2 / -0

^^^ OANN + Infowars = communist nightmare.

10
Everybody__Lies 10 points ago +10 / -0

100% agree

1
DrDT 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont mind paying for it if I was able to pay them directly and stream it directly from them, but I dont want to give another tech company my money.

1
empiretc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah. it's $5/mo through Roku. That would be the way to do it. Or the fire tv. that way it goes directly to them.

1
lukeskywalker 1 point ago +1 / -0

no commercials on it.... $5 / month on firetv not sure about roku and other smart devices

-16
FluhanWu -16 points ago +2 / -18

So should healthcare. But lets start with OAN for now. If Empiretc would agree to 92% tax rate we could all have free OAN.

14
empiretc 14 points ago +14 / -0

Sorry, we don't accept your commie ways. Your terms are unacceptable........LMAO

5
FluhanWu 5 points ago +7 / -2

Don't turn this around on me now. You are the one asking for free stuff. Pay OAN for their service, I'll pay for mine, then we can all cover our own medical expenses too because this ain't New Finland or whatever commieland you come from where all the TV channels are free.

4
DrDT 4 points ago +4 / -0

He said "free like newsmax" -- newsmax is paid by advertisers, and the customer pays by watching the advertisements. It is a different type of "free".

"Free" healthcare would require either forcing doctors into some type of slavery, or rationing healthcare based on the whims of whatever bureaucrat has the power to regulate it. It is a different type of "free".

11
nanowerx 11 points ago +11 / -0

Pluto.tv

11
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 11 points ago +11 / -0

Friend, OAN is free through the rest of the year on klowdtv. They have an app as well. Well worth the $5/mo sub though, and you get infowars as a bonus.

4
empiretc 4 points ago +4 / -0

Am aware. Have other sources to receive OAN, though. Didn't really care for the OAN Encore on PlutoTV.

3
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I don't like encore, news is too old. Good stuff but not as current.

1
empiretc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, and they do a lot more commentary.

3
Everybody__Lies 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thinking about klowd subscription, but klowd isn't working on my tv for the free trial period.

2
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I'll admit the app isn't great by any stretch. If someone is watching them in a different way I would love to hear how.

4
RedditIs4Retards 4 points ago +5 / -1

Just watch them on YouTube or something

3
Everybody__Lies 3 points ago +3 / -0

I tend to keep the tv on pretty much just a news channel for background noise.

3
RedditIs4Retards 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't have a smart TV? I might be wrong but you might be able to have them playing on YouTube

3
Everybody__Lies 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've got a smart tv, but klowd never loads.

2
Dudewho 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make sure you've installed/upgraded to the latest firmware on your tv

2
DrDT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does their youtube channel have a live stream? I dont want to click through individual snippits, I want to have a news program that just plays.

4
TheRealMaga 4 points ago +4 / -0

they're streaming on klowdtv.com for the rest of 2020

you can also listen on streaming devices like Echo also

even some places like this around that you could maybe cast to a TV https://www.watchnews.pro/oan.html

5
empiretc 5 points ago +5 / -0

Would way rather pay the $5 directly to OAN than pay watchnews

2
Everybody__Lies 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't get klowd to work on my samsung.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
15
Carbum 15 points ago +15 / -0

People blindly following the next cuck after tucker completely fucked them. Come on pedes... we can't trust anyone these days... especially a network that seamlessly took over the Fox slot like clockwork.

The MSM needs the great reset.

15
2020REBOUND 15 points ago +15 / -0

I really like what https://americasvoice.news/ presented the last few weeks.

A bit amatuerish sometimes but very good charisma. Nice people.

I also would hope Right Side Broadcasting to get really into more news.

6
RussianAgent13 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump should buy RSBN when he starts the Lion network in 2025.

14
you_can_do_it 14 points ago +14 / -0

Get em OAN.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
9
TXNFOURDJT 9 points ago +9 / -0

Klowd tv is too slow and doesn't stream well but Pluto TV has Newsmax and doesn't lag. They really need to fix that.

3
empiretc 3 points ago +3 / -0

The newsmax app works really well.

8
dunkeater 8 points ago +8 / -0

Nothing wrong with some capitalist competition for news viewers. I like how Newsmax has covered issues lately and don't really care about old donations, but OANN is still the best network.

7
DarkSamus61 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think no matter who people decide to support. It is definitely a good idea to know where that money is going.

To me, I see that 5$ subscription worth it as I feel like it's going to a good cause I believe in.

7
generated_name 7 points ago +7 / -0

Has Newsmax ever responded to the Clinton Foundation donation stuff? I'd be curious as to what they have to say.

6
DJT2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

They did it, just like other news organizations do to get access to the winner. They probably donated to both parties. Access means viewers and money. Don’t think OAN is so pure. If candidates don’t show up for OAN interviews, then the money will flow. We are a capitalist society and that’s just how it works.

6
Sigma [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Their response would probably be something like: “how about those crazy Democrats and their abortions...right, fellow conservatives?”.

6
Trumpisbliss 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'd watch OAN if it was more easily available. I got newsmax on youtube ffs. Why cant they do it :(

5
Crlsniper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can we please stop this in fighting? We got to this point because the only msm was fox and that gave them to power to stab us in the back, we need to come together and build up more than one station to be the conservative voice we can’t allow another fox to happen. This isn’t a problem on the left if cnn just went under or decided they were going to be super conservative all of a sudden nothing would change because there’s 20 other liberal msms to pick up the slack. We need that structure to be built on our side

6
Sigma [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’d hardly call it in fighting. We as Americans, and especially as conservatives, need to be aware of what the people and corporations we support are doing with our money.

Personally, i’m not okay with my money going toward an organization associated with a President that lied in front of Congress and who also traveled aboard Epstein’s plane ~37 times.

4
Crlsniper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ya and over 4 years ago Greg, glen beck and Cruz were as never trumpers as it comes, do we hold them to this standard also, how about the millions of current and former liberals who have voted for trump this election and probably also voted and donate for hilllary last time, should they also be cast out? I don’t care about what happened in the past I care about what these people are doing now when trump seemed to be against the wall and as far as I’m conserned newsmax and oan have both stood by the president where fox stabbed him in the back. And to your point sure let’s definitely keep an eye on them and make sure oan is just as strong for if they decide to betray us, but also make sure we have newsmax in case oan turns into another fox down the road.

3
thuggishruggishtrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump donated to the Clinton Foundation as well, just so you know.

3
Siteless_Vagrant 3 points ago +3 / -0

We're not infighting we are correcting. Deepstate/ globohomo/ swamp creatures/ satanic pedophiles will be rooted out, and we will never let them succeed in this country again. We're gonna have to burn shit down and sift through the ashes, and that's our fault for sleeping too hard for too long, to find the gems.

3
Crlsniper 3 points ago +3 / -0

And I’m just saying we should never allow another situation where only one news site is allowed to speak for the conservative voice, it’s how we allowed fox the power to do what they did when we needed them most. And as I said to another it doesn’t matter what they did in the past we got millions of pedes here now who did the same things 4 years ago, what matters is what they’ve done now when Trump was at his weakest moment in the eyes of America and were fox stabbed us in the back both newsmax and oan stood with the president and that right there is enough to give them the chance to grow, both of them.

2
Siteless_Vagrant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Newsmax, until recently, was sort of going along with the mainstream cuck establishment. On the website a lot of the time, they still are. People are just saying the Newsmax is setting up to "Fox" us in the future, and we should avoid that wherever possible. I'm not really sure why you think we're cutting ourselves off to just one news source, there are plenty.

 

PERSONALLY, I'm asking myself if we NEED "news sites", companies, at all. A thing happening on social media right now, especially Twitter and Now Parler, is people are selecting REPORTERS, based on that reporters competency. I was following Chanel Rion before I started looking at OANN, and Emerald Robinson before I started looking at Newsmax.

 

Also, there are a TON of unaffiliated. "freelance" reporters out there, bringing up to date coverage of actual happening, with much better and unfiltered reporting. The "news" landscape is changing, and that's not a bad thing. I've already started referring to Fox, CNN, NBS, ABC, CBS as "legacy media". In my life, they're done. It's over. I don't have them on my phone, computer, TV, they're gone. My FIRST source of news it here on TD, and until Twitter banned me again yesterday, there, and Parler. Now just Parler. The reporters I follow on there bring me the news and I can compare (easily) the different sources, and decide whether they are full of it.

5
Highball 5 points ago +5 / -0

The problem with OANN is their news talent is pretty awful. I feel like I'm living in Casper, Wyoming watching the local news full of recent college graduates.

4
RussianAgent13 4 points ago +4 / -0

The problem with all of these small conservative channels is budget. If they could grow they'd be able to improve talent and production.

3
Highball 3 points ago +3 / -0

I looked up a bunch of the anchors one time. Non of them had any experience or even degrees in Broadcast Communications. And I can tell you right now the females barely make more than minimum wage in the small markets like 150 and above. If they were recent college grads, I'd say no big deal. But many of them have worked for years at OANN. Even a year is enough time to become comfortable sounding when amchoring the show. I'm sure OANN is just being mismanaged and they have set very low expectations for their news talent.

2
anon572759 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a valid complaint. Honestly I stopped going to OANN because the home page never gives me warm fuzzies as far as articles go. I get trying to be "fair" but I don't need my truth and facts balanced out by muh feels.

1
Vests123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does "look" of the program matter more than actual honest content?

I would be willing to put up with less in actual look of the reports to get the Right perspective on the news.

5
Mathetai 5 points ago +5 / -0

OAN is the only one.

4
CzechForTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

When the KRAKEN is released there will be no more Clinton foundation to donate to, lol

4
circusmonkey 4 points ago +4 / -0

Newsmax CEO donated $1 million to the Clinton Foundation

4
FlamingButBased 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was wrong to be dazzled by the flashy new-ness of CUCKY Newsmax. Trusty OANN reigns supreme!!

3
MullyGrubber 3 points ago +3 / -0

I love OAN!

3
MAG_n_KAG 3 points ago +3 / -0

Theres something swampy about Newsmax, i cant put my finger on it.

3
TyrannyBuster 3 points ago +3 / -0

OANN is the only beacon of reason in this full blown clown world.

3
JKillen 3 points ago +3 / -0

So I made a post last week asking about the CEO of Newsmax donating money to the Clinton Foundation, handful of you faggots on here gave me shit for it.

Shortly after that, while speaking to Newsmax, Lin Wood disconnected after mentioning Jorge Soroso, same as Newt Gingrich was shut down for mentioning Soros on Fox.

3
Tantalus4200 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol, she lurks

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
NoMoreMao 3 points ago +3 / -0

KEK!

3
Alpha_plus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shot fired lol

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
MAGASQUAD 3 points ago +3 / -0

Didnt the clinton foundation shut down after she lost?

2
Sigma [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t think so, though I remember seeing a graphic showing how their received donations took a big dive after that.

2
peltast 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think somebody said that they were going to. BUT...it may have been hopeful Patriots with some wishful thinking, or slimy DS agents trying to take the spotlight off of the CF.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Flipbarryfromreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

😭 💜 I love this

2
ReaganRevolution 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oooh! Shot across the bow!

OAN needs to vastly improve its production quality though.

2
Turd_Master 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chanel Rion is a bit tasty.

2
Redpill-notCommieRed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Facts given!

2
SyNiKaLiTy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shower thought: If the DNC backs specific news stations, and gives money to them, and then these people take and give money back to the DNC, how is this NOT illegal/money laundering?

2
Elvathelion 2 points ago +2 / -0

Monolithic, corporate controlled media needs to die.

It's not that it can never produce good fruits - but it will always devolve over time because the business model is not conducive to retaining integrity.

Newsmax, OANN...et al. will suffer the same fate.

Success will inexorably make them a failure. Corruption rots these organizations from the inside once they become too large. Over ripe fruit rots on the vine.

The same problems that corporate media displays are also shared equally by social media.

Parler, GAB and Bitchute...are not the future for the same reasons stated above.

Citizen, aka peer to peer journalism, is the future.

2
MikePlacid 2 points ago +2 / -0

When I see a twit that is not marked as disputed by multiple sources - my internal neural network considers it suspicious. Just noticed.

2
WillHammer 2 points ago +2 / -0

SHOTS FIRED!

1
Pompelulu 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should also state how much OANN gets from Soros related groups. Lets if any other news company can respond.

1
CommanderJehu 1 point ago +1 / -0

cough newsmax cough

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MudDog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good. Good.

-4
TrumpsBigBalls -4 points ago +4 / -8

TRUMP HIMSELF DONATED to them....do we all now hate Trump? throws hands up the shit we choose to fight about is mind boggling.

-7
esheki808 -7 points ago +5 / -12

Damn I love that 'Merican competition 🦅🇺🇸