4534
Comments (87)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Mashiki 2 points ago +2 / -0

They ban people and things they disagree with, even when it's legal within US law, while claiming that they're a free speech platform that adheres to US law. I was on there, when they started doing it starting and deleted my profile because they started doing it.

You can find the proof easily enough, go look at the people with objectionable opinions against say Jews, or their anti-porn crusade, or the various conspiracy theory people they've banned.

What's advertised on the tin, is not the final product.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +0 / -1
1
Mashiki 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's fact, and it's why as a free speech absolutist don't use them.

Believe whatever you want to believe, but they're not a 'free speech' platform.

edit: Why don't you go look up the shit stain known as weev when they banned him.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Mashiki 0 points ago +1 / -1

So you're saying despite your claims of it being a free speech platform. And they banned a shit stain(a nazi fuckwad) which is legal speech in the US. You're going to die on that hill? Reminder that in the US material that passes the DOST isn't child porn either - and people were banned for that. Despite the claims from gab that the only standard they hold is US laws on speech.

Yes, that whole chump thing does apply to you in the defense of the indefensible.