Yeah I wish he was more levelheaded about calling his detractor out. I saw that video and the guy was super respectful and logical. Dr Shiva also never explained how in the last video he said the normal line should be completely flat and now he’s saying the normal line is this curve. He really should’ve acknowledged that mistake and then gone on to explain why there’s still proof of manipulation.
In general I’m more wary about him, even though I hope he’s right.
Yeah I wish he was more levelheaded about calling his detractor out. I saw that video and the guy was super respectful and logical. Dr Shiva also never explained how in the last video he said the normal line should be completely flat and now he’s saying the normal line is this curve. He really should’ve acknowledged that mistake and then gone on to explain why there’s still proof of manipulation.
In general I’m more wary about him, even though I hope he’s right.
Wouldn't providing new evidence showing the parabola be acknowledging that he was wrong about the "flat line" hypothesis?