This one is a Federal Equal Protection so it heads for SCOTUS. [still ongoing]
The PA Supreme court was about observers. The court ruled 5-2 that an observer didn't have a right to stand anywhere, partly because their role was read-only -- that if they saw something flakey, they couldn't effect the process there.
Just reporting this: don't know why an observer can watch but is supposed to do nothing if they see a violation. (File an affidavit later???)
The case ruling and dissent would have to be read to get more out of this right now.
Ok, so we lost at PA supreme court, what happens now?
PA supreme court, nor the executive branch are allowed to create legislation.
SCOTUS baby!
We go to the next appeals court. And so on. Until we get what we want or SCOTUS
Two cases here:
This one is a Federal Equal Protection so it heads for SCOTUS. [still ongoing]
The PA Supreme court was about observers. The court ruled 5-2 that an observer didn't have a right to stand anywhere, partly because their role was read-only -- that if they saw something flakey, they couldn't effect the process there.
Just reporting this: don't know why an observer can watch but is supposed to do nothing if they see a violation. (File an affidavit later???)
The case ruling and dissent would have to be read to get more out of this right now.
PA supreme court re-wrote Act 77
Of course they are not oging to rule against themselves
this one will go to SCOTUS as well
That Case was for Ballot Observers, and this case we are listening to is about Mail-In Ballots, correct?