5811
posted ago by -f-b-i- [M] ago by -f-b-i- +5812 / -1

Please keep all discussion here and out of the transcript thread

Comments (1841)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
146
Pomilui 146 points ago +146 / -0

A fraudulent vote invalidates a valid vote

It’s that simple

This is a weak argument by the defense. If this leads to a dismissal, we will be pissed.

Your vote is your fucking free speech

By counting invalid votes you are invalidating a legal right to free speech

Which is a constitutional guarantee

It’s a fucking federal issue

Not a state issue

The state failed to allow equal protection

The two plaintiffs did not count their fucking vote

But others were allowed to fix their votes

This is literally not treating votes the same

13
Phins360_FL 13 points ago +14 / -1

thanks great explanation

13
weltbild 13 points ago +13 / -0

Your vote is your fucking free speech

it is your franchise without it you are not even worth 3/5 of a citizen which they wanted for their slaves

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
NotMyGovernor 3 points ago +3 / -0

Enough fraudulent votes invalidate ALL the rest of the votes

-1
540k-Again -1 points ago +2 / -3

*hugs Some very important redpills for my frens, might be too many for one sitting:

A fraudulent vote invalidates a valid vote

[Redpilled Correction] If the fraudulent votes are enough to change the outcome of an election, it invalidates around half the total votes cast (give or take a little), which can be x100 or x1000 as many than x1.

Your vote is your fucking free speech

[Redpilled Correction] We use "australian ballots" aka secret ballots. This is one reason why absentee/mail ballots are bad, they cannot protect a voter's secret ballot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_ballot

[Redpill Bill of Rights] Because it supposed to be secret, this is the exact opposite of "Free Speech" you are not speaking to others. And voting is NOT a right to all citizens, whereas US Citizens can all have "free speech", voting requires additional things in addition to being a US Citizen like: like being of age, being free/non-felon, being a resident of the jurisdiction, etc. Democrats try to bluepill this into a "bill of rights issue" or "muh citizen or muh person" issue; but voting is different than those things.

Not a state issue

[Founding Father's wisdom of our Republic, Electoral College] Your "vote" for POTUS/VP is an advisory vote to your State's legislature, bc by the US Constitution, it's your State's Legislature who appoints Electors, and the Electors then vote for POTUS & VP.

It’s a fucking federal issue

[Most important Redpill of our Republic] Your vote for non-Potus/VP offices, is part of the "guaranteed republican form of government" clause in the US Constitution.

Which is a constitutional guarantee

[Invert the dem propaganda for the real Redpill] This "republican form of government" is what is THE Constitutional Guarantee!! The "rights" like speech are NOT GUARNATEED by the government, they are GOD GIVEN RIGHTS, which the government cannot take away without due process. The Bill of Rights is mostly more accurately called the "Bill of things that government officials or gov power, doesn't have the ability to mess with without due process(like a trial/conviction or just compensation); bc all through history and human nature, people will try to take these from other people." eg gungrabbers.

The state failed to allow equal protection

If read the whole 14th Amendment, it says what to do about say a State which fails to allow half of it's male over age 21 non-criminal citizens not vote; they lose half their Electors, etc.

[Redpill] But this isn't an equal protection issue. And Bush v Gore, the SCOTUS said it was a one off case, not to be cited. Longer comment here with links if you like to read it both wikipedia and the pdg with page reference:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8urdISD/x/c/1BkVBayCgP

The two plaintiffs did not count their fucking vote

Which the proper legal court remedy would be like any government official/employee violating their Oath of Office is the court to remove them from their office.

But others were allowed to fix their votes

This shouldn't even be legal after the vote goes into the ballot box, under any circumstances.

This is literally not treating votes the same

Technically it's not treating "ballots" the same not "votes" the same. And this is one reason why having more than one type of ballot is also unconstitutional. Things like "absentee" "Mail" "electronic" etc shouldn't even lawfully exist; there is one paper ballot at the polls; the ballots never leave the polls (drive through parking lot is ok if the parking lot is part of the poll) so chain of custody of the ballot is never lost.

*Hugs

For a WIN & WIN the Whole Enchillada, with Redpill sauce only, to clean this whole Election Cycle, now and for our Posterity, across the whole USA:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EhtERu/for-everyone-who-wants-djtpence-/

WIN&WIN Plan: Basically splits the legal fight into two parts:

  • A.) Deals with winning Electors for POTUS/VP which has to be done rapidly; and

  • B.) Cleans up the entire election process; including in places like CA, NY, IL, and all the rest! All the non-POTUS/VP contests along with showing all the fraud, and Restoring Election Integrity, and redoing elections with clean rules & clean voter roles.

Get your Republican State Legislatures IN ALL STATES to appoint their DJT/Pence Electors! Things are happening every day, More winning!

Send in the autists, nimble navigators, & time-travellers! EXTRA PRAYERS!

WIN WIN WIN MORE WINNING AHEAD!