5811 PA Rudy hearing discussion thread posted 149 days ago by -f-b-i- [M] 149 days ago by -f-b-i- +5812 / -1 Please keep all discussion here and out of the transcript thread 1841 comments share 1841 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (1841) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 33 ▼ – Pomilui 33 points 149 days ago +33 / -0 The other counties didn’t have any issues We didn’t bring other counties because there is no evidence Holy shit I hope this judge has a memory longer than a goldfish So he remembers Rudy’s statement permalink save report block reply ▲ 8 ▼ – deleted 8 points 149 days ago +9 / -1 ▲ 4 ▼ – chlofefe 4 points 149 days ago +4 / -0 Rudy is the one who said that there was no evidence in other counties? permalink save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – deleted 6 points 149 days ago +6 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – Circuspanda 2 points 149 days ago +3 / -1 He might not like just the state calling him "judge" either. He does have a name... permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – prospektor 1 point 149 days ago +1 / -0 I don't think I have EVER heard anybody address a judge by his name, always only either "judge" or "your honor". permalink parent save report block reply
The other counties didn’t have any issues
We didn’t bring other counties because there is no evidence
Holy shit
I hope this judge has a memory longer than a goldfish
So he remembers Rudy’s statement
Rudy is the one who said that there was no evidence in other counties?
He might not like just the state calling him "judge" either. He does have a name...
I don't think I have EVER heard anybody address a judge by his name, always only either "judge" or "your honor".