no you're right but a judge cant dismiss a case when they're are as many affidavits and witness testimony as there is
i mean they could but they would essentially be saying that everyone is lying and perjured themselves
Hm, maybe they could say that what the witnesses testified wasn't amounting to fraud or improper treatment or whatever, so not doubting the witnesses, but dismissing the content of their testimony as irrelevant.
also possible but with the amount of witnesses it would be impossible to say that they are all irrelevant
regardless this is all formalities it will be appealed to the supreme court eventually now the issue is will the supreme court pick up the case
1 reason to assume they wont is that the case is not large enough to change the outcome of the election
however if they do pick it up its game over for the DNC
no you're right but a judge cant dismiss a case when they're are as many affidavits and witness testimony as there is i mean they could but they would essentially be saying that everyone is lying and perjured themselves
Hm, maybe they could say that what the witnesses testified wasn't amounting to fraud or improper treatment or whatever, so not doubting the witnesses, but dismissing the content of their testimony as irrelevant.
also possible but with the amount of witnesses it would be impossible to say that they are all irrelevant regardless this is all formalities it will be appealed to the supreme court eventually now the issue is will the supreme court pick up the case 1 reason to assume they wont is that the case is not large enough to change the outcome of the election however if they do pick it up its game over for the DNC