That was a damn good opening statement. TL/DR: We've got a shitload of evidence. We had to subtract our claim and resubmit because of how much. Here is some evidence. Don't dismiss this case like those cheaters want you to and let's just move along to the evidence. Oh, and he said we're here because if we're right, we're gonna be here in the end anyway so you should just take the case.
I don't know, even if we win PA, the entirely fake recounts will amount to nothing and we'd have to hope for audits. The states will just play chicken and certify the election anyway. The lid has to be blown off their entire operation.
the ballots observation IS equal protection. observers were allowed in one part of the states and not in another. there's over 1.5 million ballots between the two big democratic cities, and the voters there were denied a fair election, of which the outcome of not just PA, but the whole country hangs
That was a damn good opening statement. TL/DR: We've got a shitload of evidence. We had to subtract our claim and resubmit because of how much. Here is some evidence. Don't dismiss this case like those cheaters want you to and let's just move along to the evidence. Oh, and he said we're here because if we're right, we're gonna be here in the end anyway so you should just take the case.
Why am I not understanding what's happening. What if xi wouldnt take the case?
What do you mean? They're essentially arguing why the judge should or should not take the case.
Yeah but what are the ways here. If they accept great. They explore and a result comes. Good or bad.
If not, what then?
We move to the next box.
But I'm afraid that we only have the equal protection case, which would be not enough ballots to change the results
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8urbvg1/x/c/1BkV2IASlF
So it seems true like fake news said that we gave up the case about the observers being denied, even if Rudy talked about it!
I don't know, even if we win PA, the entirely fake recounts will amount to nothing and we'd have to hope for audits. The states will just play chicken and certify the election anyway. The lid has to be blown off their entire operation.
If the case is about equal protection only that means they are not trying to prove fraud!
One county curing ballots and another not doing it is not fraud in a legal sense
the ballots observation IS equal protection. observers were allowed in one part of the states and not in another. there's over 1.5 million ballots between the two big democratic cities, and the voters there were denied a fair election, of which the outcome of not just PA, but the whole country hangs
But they do have a case, justice alito already ruled and acted on this issue once and the counting facilities ignored it
Turn off fake news. Get your news here.