1847
Comments (20)
sorted by:
24
hiddenconservative 24 points ago +24 / -0

Not to mention the entire Impeachment drama of 2019 was started over ONE person hearing one-side of a conversation from another room.

And Brett Kavanaugh was put through a whole bs trial due to a story given by someone recalling an event from over 30 years ago with no major witnesses.

Democrats only care about evidence when it suits their narrative.

9
Pleepleus 9 points ago +9 / -0

Ford had no witnesses to corroborate. Some even denied the house party Ford said she went to ever happened. The attack on Kavanaugh ended any trust I had left in the legacy media.

3
Groupthinkgroupthink 3 points ago +3 / -0

They started it based off their own personal bias and ambitions, they just used the excuse that it was based off a statement overheard in a bar, otherwise they would have been forced to admit it was based apropos of absolutely nothing.

An overheard conversation isn't much better though, but here we are.

3
abetterreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

It still took falsifying evidence to get a warrant for it also.

1
DickTick [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep

2
cybertygerfire88 2 points ago +2 / -0

It doesn't matter if the evidence is bulletproof, if the MSM and Google factcheckers don't tell them it's official, they won't believe it. Until then it doesn't exist or is a conspiracy.

2
PurplePunch36 2 points ago +2 / -0

A sworn affidavit is considered proof of an incident. Affidavits have put people in jail multiple times in the past. This isn’t anything new.

2
DickTick [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually it's even better than that.... A majority of the people sitting in prison in this country are there because of sworn testimony.....

1
Chick-fill-eh 1 point ago +1 / -0

And?

Seriously OP, you think that matters?

This isn't a dig on you, but just to highlight how logic doesn't apply.

1
DickTick [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course it fucking matters....

1
Chick-fill-eh 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you keep fighting by rules that only you follow, you're going to lose.

1
Anyslogan2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Excellent point.

-18
TrumpsBigBalls -18 points ago +1 / -19

Except they are not 1st hand accounts....Let me clarify this for the not so sharp pedes...

A first hand account of fraud: I was instructed by my boss to put the ballots through multiple times and did exactly that A hearsay/assumption based account: I heard my boss talking with his colleague about backdating ballots.

We don't have a single affidavit of first hand....not one.

3
DickTick [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just realized it was you again... you literally go to every single thread and post anti-trump shit and anti-.win shit.....

Don't take my word for people, look through their comments yourself....

3
DickTick [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about... Every one of Coleman's affidavits are firsthand. He might not be on Trump's team, but they were certainly used in Trump's Federal filings...

And that's just one example..... every single thing in those affidavits was shit that people saw happen firsthand....

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
DickTick [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are a fucking idiot that goes to every thread they can saying negative shit.... check out their comments.

They were just called out in another thread minutes ago, I can't believe they've been popped up in my thread too... They are getting around

2
airgag 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Maybe bought/hacked account?

I just went through the post history quickly and we get this https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XRQe3T/x/c/1BjFX1zLEp ... and later the spamming of "no evidence at all" started.

2
DickTick [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm actually thinking hacked because I've seen quite a few accounts recently, especially yesterday with all of those weird accounts that were posting the weird Chinese shit, that I hope the mods notice that some of those accounts were not new and were hundreds of days old, but just had very little activity until yesterday or very recently.

That very account we're talking about is one year old and yet had almost no activity until extremely recently....