The Dr Exspland that The Curve would Be Cured Not Stright Down . that Show somethings Not right... And that points to Fraud thats All he is Saying . he showed in a Graph 📊 what normal looks like And Not normal if you watch his Last video.
I think Dr. SHIVA NEEDS TO flip the horizontal axis for Biden. So instead of both charts going from dem to rep left to right. They both go from 0 to 100 on their own party and then you would see the biden pattern is flipped.
If you have a linear equation in two unknowns, then yes, you're going to see a fixed slope.
But the % of "Trump only" and the % of "straight party line" have two different denominators, so the linear relation does not hold.
It further doesn't hold because there is no guarantee that a person dropping out of either group MUST go into the other one: some people chose Biden only or straight Dem.
Or as Shiva pointed out, there are blank and spoiled ballots as well.
Like Shiva said, he's not doing pure math. He's doing data analysis; extracting features of the observed data.
"Obviously as SP increase left to right, SP will drag the plot down because you're subtracting SP from T votes on the Y axis."
That's true (as the mathematicians say) IF and ONLY IF SP + T = a constant.
But there's no guarantee of that, because because the % used in the SP votes, is
NOT "% of Trump votes which are SP" but instead "% of SP votes which are Trump."
Furthernore, each and every precinct is completely independent of every other precinct. That's why you have precincts where only 20% of the votes went for Trump, and others where 90% of the vote went for Trump.
Which means, that from precinct to precinct, you don't even know in advance what the total Trump is going to be, let alone what % of the total votes, let alone how the Trump votes will be apportioned between straight-party and Trump only.
The fundamental supposition behind your use of a linear equation in X and Y is invalid.
Which is what I was trying to tell you the first time.
As Nobel Physicist Wolfgang Pauli once said of another physicist's theory, "He's not even wrong."
The data is the reality. The equations are just attempts to concisely summarize the data with as little loss of fidelity as possible.
Where ever you got your degree from, it's obvious either you got ripped off, or you got socially advanced, because you have no fundamental understanding at all.
Or you're just a leftist troll hoping to confuse people.
You're too stupid for this discussion, pig-fornicator.
"If you can't see that essentially plotting something against the inverse of itself + some value will create a negative slope, "
I knew that in 8th grade. But your problem is that Dr. Shiva was NOT plotting an inverse in the first place!
You're thinking:
X= Trump only
Y=Straight-line GOP
X+Y = total Trump votes.
and therefore
X/(X+Y) + Y/(X+Y) =1
But what Shiva was plotting was something different. He even notes that the two different fractions he was using HAD A DIFFERENT DENOMINATOR.
By definition then, it CANNOT be modeled by your X + Y = total Trump votes.
Like I said, you got ripped off.
Obviously you are a lefty: you think the mere possession of a piece of paper from a University imbues intellect, rather than acting as a 0th-order indicator of it.
And of course, you are projecting your own inbred status and lack of intellect onto me.
As Dick Feynman said, "It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong."
And the ballots, and the derived measures plotted by Dr. Shiva, ARE experiment.
They don't match your equation.
Therefore, your equation DOES NOT APPLY TO THE EXPERIMENTAL DATA. The real data remains what it is.
He made a follow up video that addresses this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8xb6qJKJqU&t=4138s
Stats that are touted as "evidence" without a control sample should be disregarded outright.
You admit that you don't understand either side of the argument, so you want to dump it. Odd.
The Dr Exspland that The Curve would Be Cured Not Stright Down . that Show somethings Not right... And that points to Fraud thats All he is Saying . he showed in a Graph 📊 what normal looks like And Not normal if you watch his Last video.
lost me with the toaster bath comment, sounds like what liberals say when you disagree.
Upvote for take a both with a toaster.
I think Dr. SHIVA NEEDS TO flip the horizontal axis for Biden. So instead of both charts going from dem to rep left to right. They both go from 0 to 100 on their own party and then you would see the biden pattern is flipped.
Sod off, troll-boi.
You don't know WTF you're talking about.
You need data scientists not mathematicians.
We're not looking at a linear equation here, but live data.
Go felch a camel. Typical liberal bluster.
If you have a linear equation in two unknowns, then yes, you're going to see a fixed slope.
But the % of "Trump only" and the % of "straight party line" have two different denominators, so the linear relation does not hold.
It further doesn't hold because there is no guarantee that a person dropping out of either group MUST go into the other one: some people chose Biden only or straight Dem.
Or as Shiva pointed out, there are blank and spoiled ballots as well.
Moron.
...And, you've proven you're an idiot.
Like Shiva said, he's not doing pure math. He's doing data analysis; extracting features of the observed data.
"Obviously as SP increase left to right, SP will drag the plot down because you're subtracting SP from T votes on the Y axis."
That's true (as the mathematicians say) IF and ONLY IF SP + T = a constant.
But there's no guarantee of that, because because the % used in the SP votes, is NOT "% of Trump votes which are SP" but instead "% of SP votes which are Trump."
Furthernore, each and every precinct is completely independent of every other precinct. That's why you have precincts where only 20% of the votes went for Trump, and others where 90% of the vote went for Trump.
Which means, that from precinct to precinct, you don't even know in advance what the total Trump is going to be, let alone what % of the total votes, let alone how the Trump votes will be apportioned between straight-party and Trump only.
The fundamental supposition behind your use of a linear equation in X and Y is invalid.
Which is what I was trying to tell you the first time.
As Nobel Physicist Wolfgang Pauli once said of another physicist's theory, "He's not even wrong."
The data is the reality. The equations are just attempts to concisely summarize the data with as little loss of fidelity as possible.
Where ever you got your degree from, it's obvious either you got ripped off, or you got socially advanced, because you have no fundamental understanding at all.
Or you're just a leftist troll hoping to confuse people.
Sucks to be you.
You're too stupid for this discussion, pig-fornicator.
"If you can't see that essentially plotting something against the inverse of itself + some value will create a negative slope, "
I knew that in 8th grade. But your problem is that Dr. Shiva was NOT plotting an inverse in the first place!
You're thinking:
X= Trump only Y=Straight-line GOP X+Y = total Trump votes.
and therefore
X/(X+Y) + Y/(X+Y) =1
But what Shiva was plotting was something different. He even notes that the two different fractions he was using HAD A DIFFERENT DENOMINATOR. By definition then, it CANNOT be modeled by your X + Y = total Trump votes.
Like I said, you got ripped off.
Obviously you are a lefty: you think the mere possession of a piece of paper from a University imbues intellect, rather than acting as a 0th-order indicator of it.
And of course, you are projecting your own inbred status and lack of intellect onto me.
As Dick Feynman said, "It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong."
And the ballots, and the derived measures plotted by Dr. Shiva, ARE experiment. They don't match your equation.
Therefore, your equation DOES NOT APPLY TO THE EXPERIMENTAL DATA. The real data remains what it is.
My god, you're pig-f*ckingly stupid.