8258
Comments (520)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
Chick-fill-eh 8 points ago +10 / -2

I understand the term, but you must provide some evidence that it has happened as all parties involved will deny the entire premise.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
4
Chick-fill-eh 4 points ago +5 / -1

They claimed many many things about that laptop, and refused to show most of them (and I'm not even talking about the X rated stuff).

The skirting is likely vague enough that it doesn't matter.

5
hitchhiker 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ignoring the fact that it would be evidence when he is finally prosecuted, those pictures would be illegal to distribute with her being underage.

4
zooty 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not uncommon. Decidedly less uncommon at Biden levels, of course. You only have to look at how the UK police covered for their connected pedos. It'll be no different here. Even still, in light of the laptop, it's very disconcerting...

0
-6
Chick-fill-eh -6 points ago +2 / -8

Yea yea, I've seen the picture proofs, and frankly I don't give a shit. Hate me if you like, but I don't care that hunter was fucking a 14 year old. I don't even care if china handed him a bus load of little Chinese girls to dispose of as he pleased.

Give me the data. I want the emails, the documents, etc. We must shatter the globalists, not just arrest one random loser.

3
LongDongDonald420x69 3 points ago +4 / -1

"That's the point of "statutory"." - "I understand the term, but you must provide some evidence that it has happened as all parties involved will deny the entire premise." hurr durrr

-1
Chick-fill-eh -1 points ago +1 / -2

The FBI already investigated the laptop and said they didn't find anything bad. So I hope you have some great evidence.

Regardless, hunter is one guy. Great if we can lock him up, but doing so doesn't really change anything.