8258
Comments (520)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
flashersenpai 5 points ago +5 / -0

if women are the "primary caregivers" then why are single mother households so bad for childhood outcomes?

also why are "primary caregivers" the majority of child abusers according to Health and Human Services records?

the whole idea of primary maternal care, particularly enshrined in law, was a feminist creation of the 1830's in England which later morphed into the less blatantly sexist "best interest of the child" standard

3
Plugthegamey 3 points ago +3 / -0

My mom left us for a 24 year old when I was 14 and I was lucky that she didnt want anything to do with me and my brother after that. We lost our house and everything after that and 12 years later she found out my dad inherited money and bought me and my brother a house and starts emailing him about how he never paid her for half of the house.... well guess what bitch the house was taken by the bank, wasnt worth anything, and you never paid a dime of child support while our father struggled with heart problems and medication that gave him dementia. He always divided everything into thirds between him, me and my brother. We truly became a family after she left. Now she wonders why me and my brother want nothing to do with her. To this day, my dad is my best friend. Women hold too much empowerment by just popping out kids.

2
memechallenger33 2 points ago +2 / -0

People are primarily abused by those who have access to them. No access = no abuse. Primary care givers will always have more access.

2
GeoG85 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even the single mom as she goes through it, is full of shit entirely.

Tells the courts, "Yea, no problem - I can handle this kid no problem."

Soon as she's home "I can't do this by myself! SOMEONE has to do something!"

:/