A signature is analog, first of all, objectively it's different every time you sign something, secondly to a computer it's different every time period, there has to be some threshold for a match. Even signing a piece of paper, then running that through a xerox and presenting both of those to software won't result in a 100% match.
I know that, I am not advocating for just setting it at 100%. What I was arguing that a baseline should be established before the election and deployed everywhere. And then, it should not be something you can overrule and just lower it just because.
Source? So much info flying by. Missed this.
Adam Laxalt made this claim at press conference today. https://youtu.be/pXf9MNY_omk?t=3230
Ty
Please link the source. So much info we don't need any fake news gaining traction to discredit our side.
I am wondering why this is something you can SET. This option should be greyed out for fucks sake
A signature is analog, first of all, objectively it's different every time you sign something, secondly to a computer it's different every time period, there has to be some threshold for a match. Even signing a piece of paper, then running that through a xerox and presenting both of those to software won't result in a 100% match.
I know that, I am not advocating for just setting it at 100%. What I was arguing that a baseline should be established before the election and deployed everywhere. And then, it should not be something you can overrule and just lower it just because.
That's the issue, they claim the baseline was set at 40% and locked in.
um, DUH.
well, yeah
no shit sherlock
Source?
Signature match is so subjective.
Its why people hereto vote in person and show a photo of.
Who makes the signature software?
They have done it almost everywhere, including Georgia. Sad to tell you but rhe ball is now in American Patriots' court. We have to fight