2666
Comments (159)
sorted by:
69
Trump-Train 69 points ago +71 / -2

So this means the Kracken IS that Cray Supercompter Array?

39
blacktankguy 39 points ago +39 / -0

that would be pretty neat if they used a supercomputer to make their legal case

19
Behind_Blue_Lines_II 19 points ago +19 / -0

Lookin that way fren!

13
jump3r34 13 points ago +13 / -0

Please explain.

55
Trump-Train 55 points ago +55 / -0

so when she said "Release the Kracken" we speculated it could be referring to an Array of Cray Supercompters (chained together to compute bigger equations)

So she's thinking (like I am too) that the completely impossible voter turnout for Biden in the swingstates is the 'smoking gun' and I think she's right.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
0
HockeyMom4Trump 0 points ago +1 / -1

Can you explain what this means? I apologize. I am ignorant sometimes and don’t grasp Array of Cray Supercompters stuff? What does all this mean?

3
Trump-Train 3 points ago +4 / -1

It’s just a really fast computer to crunch all the different number sets and then run computer programs against them to determine fraud.

We’re talking about almost 200,000,000 individual votes and then there are all the calculations trying to figure out if there are statistical anomaly’s in them

That just takes a really powerful computer. So a super computer is just a purpose built computer that can process huge mathematical equations quickly. Typically they’re used by places like NASA etc. to calculate orbital trajectories — or by Google and the NSA etc. to examine massive amounts of user data and determine who should get advertised watt

2
HockeyMom4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for this clarification! Now I understand. I appreciate you explaining it so well.

2
Patroklos_Maga 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes it is time they stop talking through enigmas and start delivering what they have, it's frustrating, make everyone nervous.

38
Trump-Train 38 points ago +38 / -0

here's a better article https://www.nics.tennessee.edu/uts-kraken-supercomputer-named-worlds-sixth-fastest

basically this older supercomputer is being rented by the legal team to crunch the huge amount of numbers and it will provide some science for the dems.

17
farangbak 17 points ago +17 / -0

science for the dems

LOL

14
thekindlyman555 14 points ago +14 / -0

Trust the science, bigot!

2
WhoMurderedSethRich 2 points ago +2 / -0

We believe in SCIENCE

(girls can be boys)

12
jump3r34 12 points ago +12 / -0

You are awesome!

4
Whirlybot 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's at a state university full of SJWs. How can they be sure their work will be safe and unadulterated?

5
Trump-Train 5 points ago +6 / -1

I worked at a state university one state over - and the science/engineering departments were not cucked. Those were the only places where students actually "competed" with each other still, like in the old days of "merit = success" Engineering and computer science takes actual brains....so that's how you know you might have some Conservatives around (even if they don't identify as such)

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
TheZotico 4 points ago +4 / -0

Super computers were retired in favor of what new technology? Is there a cloud computing provider with a service called Kraken?

4
jump3r34 4 points ago +4 / -0

Says it was decommissioned in 2014.

Is it still notably used?

5
Trump-Train 5 points ago +5 / -0

I saw a bunch of people posting pics from a computer lab in TN on Twitter....so I don't know.

8
2
_Throwgali_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kraken was taken offline and retired on April 30, 2014.

That thing is old as shit

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
ViduusMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

A 6 year old Cray is still one hell of a machine. I wouldn’t want that thing computing my jail time... hopefully they have half decent people programming it though.

4
DOTR_KAG 4 points ago +5 / -1

That’s what I was thinking...

45
lasTRUMPcard 45 points ago +50 / -5

Cue the Sidney Powell doomers paid to demoralize.

30
deleted 30 points ago +32 / -2
23
lasTRUMPcard 23 points ago +24 / -1

Doomers are also people who exhibit ZERO PATIENCE and muddy up this site with their anxious blatherings. THAT IS CONCERN TROLLING

10
deleted 10 points ago +12 / -2
6
lasTRUMPcard 6 points ago +9 / -3

It's not even about having hope. It's about PATIENCE. Adults should know these things take time. Any inference that because it isn't going fast enough nothing is happening is exactly the demoralization techniques employed on other platforms.

1
supersecretaccount82 1 point ago +6 / -5

Can you at least recognize that we've been fed the "patience, all in due time..." thing by tick tockers the last 4 years with no results? There's a reason some of us are fed up with being told to wait, especially now that time is genuinely running out.

3
lasTRUMPcard 3 points ago +7 / -4

Was Sidney Powell a tick tocker? No. So you impatience is your own problem. Every time you say "time is running out" that is another indication you are a loser concern troll. Live with it.

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
8
Rreidy8286 8 points ago +8 / -0

I saw that too.. Seems kinda out of place huh?

23
Polar_bearwrestler 23 points ago +23 / -0

She's shitposting

8
Skogin 8 points ago +8 / -0

She’s referring to herself.

6
lurkwellmyfriends 6 points ago +6 / -0

I took it as humorous and reassuring - i.e., "I've got the goods".

At least, that's the hope.

10
Hairy_Mouse 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, just like she put #TrustTheScience

Basically using libtard phrases against them to expose their hypocrisy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
MAUSGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Love seeing that deployed for good, not evil!

33
MAGA_4EVER 33 points ago +33 / -0

I love the leftist hashtags behind thrown back at them.

Trust the science

Believe all women

Genius

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
7
MAGA_4EVER 7 points ago +7 / -0

That was my thinking exactly.

They started going public.

Most people on this site don't realize all the strategy that goes behind this. Most people on here are an average joe. They mean well but they're scared. Can't say I'm not a little scared. But sometimes you have to let it all play out and take it as each day comes.

At this point, I just do what I can with what time I have.

I trust trump.

I go to rallies.

I'm about to start helping with voter fraud.

I keep telling the truth to my doomer and lib family and friends.

And I buy ammo and food for when the shit hits the fan.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
16
deleted 16 points ago +20 / -4
22
LongKahn 22 points ago +22 / -0

The fact this kind of statistics is already used in criminal cases involving fraud should be assuring

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
2
otiluke711 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was used to completely prove suspicious activity

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
otiluke711 3 points ago +3 / -0

Math alone CAN ABSOLUTELY PROVE Fraud.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
otiluke711 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your argument is a losing one because you have completely failed to refute the statistical analysis presented.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
0
ViduusMAGA 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sadly you could.

We processed mail in ballets using batches of 4800 so we could regularly report our totals. The batches were well mixed due to the mail process (cue dr shiva) and our precinct was 95% Biden.

True or not - you have an explanation and no one would risk throwing out valid ballots to say the explanation isn’t correct.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
richmomz 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's not proof of fraud but it is indicative, and that's enough to force a full ballot audit.

3
spaceforce_chaplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

Parsimony, even in mathematics, is highly valued though. If you have two competing analyses and one is simple and indicates a clear motivation whereas the other is complicated, contrived, and indeterminate in terms of motivation, the former will be favored over the latter.

1
otiluke711 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have not refuted this statistical analysis...Not even by a long shot

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
otiluke711 1 point ago +1 / -0

This information itself can definitely be used as proof of election fraud.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
otiluke711 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh wow...Resorting to Ad Hominem attacks when you cannot refute math and statistical analysis arguments.,.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
kmj1104213 2 points ago +2 / -0

But dna evidence is not 100% foolproof, but the court accepts it. If they can get the statistical confidence level above that same % accuracy, the court would have to accept it if they accept that same confidence level of dna matching.

2
otiluke711 2 points ago +2 / -0

“‘Smartmatic’ Vote-Counting System Was Manipulated in PA and GA to Overturn Trump's Victory

Guess what was used to prove the above statement... Math and statistical analysis presented in the article.

Manipulation of the voting system is an aspect of election fraud. This article used statistical analysis to prove that

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
kmj1104213 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just playing devils advocate but memory can glitch, thats why they made ECC memory and checksums.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
kmj1104213 1 point ago +1 / -0

But you said “ever”. Just being precise since language matters, especially when we are talking about legal things.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
9
Yewki 9 points ago +10 / -1

For anyone who missed it the first time like me, FOLLOW THE LINK IN HER TWEET

Holy sh*t

1
Patroklos_Maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes yes I second that, impressive. Could the late shift in favor of Biden be explained by mail in ballots counted later? I doubt it.

7
lifeisahologram 7 points ago +9 / -2

I think she is underestimating the judges lol.

Even if she can get the lower court judges to admit the issue, they will probably just say something like "This was illegal and fraudulent....so we are gonna go ahead and let this election slide, and those democrats now know they have to follow the law next time!"

But thankfully we have US SOCTUS! GET FUCKED COMMIES!

7
RC22 7 points ago +7 / -0

The spreadsheet is made from the timestamped data from NYT made just to organize all the timestamped data into an easy presentation. I am just a truck driver and I figured that one out.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
7
Dessert4TWO69 7 points ago +8 / -1

We need to start up cloning so we have more of her and a few others.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
otiluke711 2 points ago +2 / -0

People who support Biden and the democrats

5
lurkwellmyfriends 5 points ago +5 / -0

The leader is reassuring the troops. Good and comforting. I've been a little frazzled hitting F5 on multiple sites today.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
spaceforce_chaplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

Makes me proud I slipped Sidney Powell's Legal Defense Fund some dough. I hope others feel inspired to do the same. Good news too: she is under no legal obligation to reveal donors so no leftist psychopaths will put your name on a list if you donate. Donate here if able: https://ldfftar.org/

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
spaceforce_chaplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

My receipt featured her name spelled correctly. Her own website links directly to ldfftar.org for donations. You can check out the direct link here: https://www.sidneypowell.com/

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
spaceforce_chaplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

I donated on 11/17. Somewhere between your donation and mine, the spelling was corrected. I'm sure other people are looking after these websites for her. She has a lot on her plate at the moment.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Loscann 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or deboooonked

2
sorrytodisagree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrats dispute the number of genders. Pretty sure statistical analysis will have zero significance to them.

2
CornPopvotesTrump 2 points ago +3 / -1

That's great they figured out the fraud with the machines. How do they present this in court and overturn the votes in those states?

2
Ehi_Passika 2 points ago +4 / -2

Statistical evidence indicates a problem, but does not constitute proof.

2
otiluke711 2 points ago +2 / -0

It definitely constitutes proof

1
Ehi_Passika 1 point ago +1 / -0

How so? Whenever in the history of jurisprudence? It points to a problem to look in to, but given the range of possible outcomes, no matter how unlikely, a statistical analysis is not absolute proof.

2
otiluke711 2 points ago +2 / -0

It completely proves suspicious activity in this case. There is no strong counterargument for it so it is even more damning evidence that completely proves “‘Smartmatic‘ Vote-Counting System Was Manipulated in PA and GA to Overturn Trump's Victory“

1
Ehi_Passika 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, unless there is additional evidence that would indicate how the results were rigged to produce the statistically unlikely outcomes, and unlikely doesn’t mean impossible, be prepared for a huge disappointment when courts agree that the finding are unlikely but not impossible.

2
otiluke711 2 points ago +2 / -0

This evidence alone is irrefutable and the findings are impossible based on the math.

1
Ehi_Passika 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope so, the more bullshit I hear ... .

2
Rreidy8286 2 points ago +3 / -1

Believe all woman????? Huh?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Truglow 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can present all the empirical evidence you want but these psycos won't admit to it. Hate not logic drives them. The justice system has betrayed us. It's about time to go medieval on these fucks.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
WhoBuiltTheCagesJOOO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bring it to me Sidney baby! My body is ready!

1
touchmystuffIkillyou 1 point ago +1 / -0

What the do some of these hashtags and people have to do with the topic?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Staatssicherheit 0 points ago +1 / -1

404 not found.

-1
TheUpsetter -1 points ago +4 / -5

I hope she has more than statistical analysis

1
otiluke711 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you can’t disprove it, then it is strong evidence.

-2
daty_dato -2 points ago +3 / -5

They need to shit or get off the pot. Waiting much longer and these states will certify and their will be almost no recourse available.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +5 / -9
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
otiluke711 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe all of what ReaganRevolution is saying is a bunch of lies...He has trouble refuting the statistical analysis...So he posts a bunch of lies...

-4
deleted -4 points ago +3 / -7
-5
Here_we_go -5 points ago +1 / -6

Ehhhh thought it was something better. Numbers really dont reel normie people in as much when talking about it being rigged with no fingerprint left. Because the left will say Trump took control of the computer and fucked with it.

3
RC22 3 points ago +4 / -1

Gong you have been gonged. Computers leave fingerprints.

-5
Yewki -5 points ago +3 / -8

EDIT: I'm an idiot and didn't even see the link to the data holy sh*t

I think the Dems absolutely cheated on a large scale, but I'm starting to think the Dominion thing isn't going to lead anywhere. Think about it. If they actually used Dominion to alter the vote counts, a simple hand recount would unravel everything. More than likely they did it the old fashioned way by using physical, fraudulent ballots

So far we've come across some cases here and there, but the numbers are small and it looks isolated cases of incompetence/fraud

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
p3rsonman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure, Jan

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
-5
deleted -5 points ago +8 / -13
6
otiluke711 6 points ago +7 / -1

Maybe ReaganRevolution is trying to spread false info by calling this stupid.

2
Siteless_Vagrant 2 points ago +7 / -5

When you find out the "Kraken" is a spreadsheet... https://i.maga.host/v2Tih0R.gif

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-1
ReaganRevolution -1 points ago +6 / -7

A spreadsheet sure isn't the BIG BOOM we were hoping for.

3
RC22 3 points ago +3 / -0

The spreadsheet is made from the timestamped data from NYT made just to organize all the timestamped data into an easy presentation. I am just a truck driver and I figured that one out.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-8
ChipahTss -8 points ago +9 / -17

Im getting tired of catch phrases

14
Behind_Blue_Lines_II 14 points ago +18 / -4

and we're tired of blackpilled faggots like you

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
-7
deleted -7 points ago +4 / -11
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
lurkwellmyfriends 2 points ago +2 / -0

Things that you can only find on the Al Gore interwebs:

CumInAnus asks very valid questions.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
MrWWonka 1 point ago +1 / -0

aint easy arguing with stupid, but well done!

0
krepoisbest 0 points ago +1 / -1

It was neither good or bad, it was totally expected: https://twitter.com/Peoples_Pundit/status/1328816028843978753

5
DemsFuckKids 5 points ago +5 / -0

we're the kraken party now

3
ChipahTss 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its funny how the kraken was supposed to be the evidence that won everything and now it is Sydney Powell. Thats reassuring