7384
() 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by Mad_Hattie ago by Mad_Hattie +7384 / -0
Comments (656)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1130
deleted 1130 points ago +1131 / -1
703
deleted 703 points ago +708 / -5
299
Barron2052 299 points ago +299 / -0

Trump and GOP need to be tough and just give them the middle finger!

163
deleted 163 points ago +163 / -0
236
Rainman 236 points ago +236 / -0

This will be overturned by the SCOTUS. PA judges were just being partisan fucks.

Any jurist should look at what the intent of the law was which is clearly to enable observation of canvassing. If the intent was just to let observers be in the vicinity of canvassing, then the law serves no meaningful purpose. Clearly that's not the case

33
TruuthSeeker 33 points ago +33 / -0

Fucking birders, no joke in a golf tournament once, we go to tee off first hole shotgun start and no shit a fucking dumbass staring into the tree watching birds. My friend walks up like "hey, are you a fucking birder?" Was the happiest I have ever seen a grown as man, he was acknowledged, i feel this is how all libs feel at this moment.

32
deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
32
RoBatten 32 points ago +32 / -0

So true. But what the GOPe doesn't realize, is that those 73 million people voted Trump, not GOP. And we will remember this.

17
ScreamingEagles 17 points ago +17 / -0

"They are in front of us, behind us, and we are flanked on both sides by an enemy that outnumbers us 29:1. They can’t get away from us now!” “Great. Now we can shoot at them from every direction.”

Good. I'm PRO-TRUMP, SCREW EVERYONE ELSE!

6
MamaMiMi 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hey! President Trump will never be on his own. He has the 80,000,000 Patriots who voted for him on his side! I know if I had to choose between some dried up old sack of GOP bones or 80,000,000 of you guys to have my back, that choice would be simple. Hang, I would rather have 3 of you by my side in a fight than all the GOP hacks! We have seen way too much evidence of treasonous fraud in this election, we are not just going to roll over and accept any old outcome to this election. We can't! If we let the Commie-crats get away with this, we will lose America Home of the Brave and Free. On top of that, if we allow the Commie-crats steal the election, our GEOTUS will be in mortal danger ! Those Commie-crats will arrest him on jumped up charges ( is that the correct term or is it pumped up charges?) then they'll put him in a cell by himself "for his own safety"! So we must make sure that he stays in the White House! We can do that! No problem!

4
deleted 4 points ago +7 / -3
26
Necrovoter 26 points ago +26 / -0

Needs to go to SCOTUS, and get a ruling that will cover other states as well.

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
10
Phins360_FL 10 points ago +14 / -4

agree

I keep pushing this but get the fuck downvoted out of me from some of our smooth brained members

6
pray4peace4 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't downvote you... at least not for that. Lin Wood agrees with you, Trump agrees with you.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
3
Whimpy13 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are allowed to vote, just not select who you vote for. 🤡🌎

12
mytummyhurts 12 points ago +12 / -0

Holy shit what a red pill

4
_glazmain_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Democrats have actually been the true racists

2
MikeVicksAstrologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same racists, different decade

160
pithys 160 points ago +160 / -0

hijacking to say the video is messed up for some ppl. Can view the the vid here https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/059/914/170/original/39a746d2788925a0.mp4

63
Star_Commander 63 points ago +64 / -1

THANK YOU!

Also:

HOLY SHIT!

15
OurTrueSaviourTrump 15 points ago +16 / -1

I can just tell all those vote counters are corrupt and aren't actually 'counting' anything - more like marking every second Trump vote as a Biden vote.

6
Please_Clap 6 points ago +8 / -2

I just have to say how proud I am that they let us watch their election. Really such a nice gesture on their part! :)

32
deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
16
HockeyMom4Trump 16 points ago +16 / -0

ABSOLUTELY APPALLING. WTF.

NOT OKAY PA.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
11
Philhelm 11 points ago +11 / -0

HONK HONK!

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Days without honk may be in danger of running into negative numbers.

70
deleted 70 points ago +70 / -0
46
BilbroNaggins 46 points ago +46 / -0

Hunter Biden and Crack

12
TuckerCarlsonsTie 12 points ago +12 / -0

Hunter Biden and FJs.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
5
Alpha-As-Fuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bill Clinton and Rape

5
kckilgann0n 5 points ago +5 / -0

Communism and starvation.

3
Proudly_Deplorable 3 points ago +3 / -0

Communism and rigged elections.

3
BiglyBallotBoy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hillary and prison

2
MightyEighth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not really a duo if it’s the same thing

57
UpTrump 57 points ago +57 / -0

Will SCOTUS overturn?

75
DO_NOT_CONCEDE 75 points ago +77 / -2

I fucking hope they do. This violates the hell out of the spirit of the law at the very least.

31
DoIMAGAYouHornyBaby 31 points ago +32 / -1

Bungo. Spirit of the law needs to be pressed. Bring up the “seperate but equal” clause that was overturned. Fucking commies. When do the impeachments start?

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
12
TheWinningNeverStops 12 points ago +12 / -0

We shall see. I wanna see what they do before I exercise my 2nd amendment.

5
ComradeSanders 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s beginning to look like our only option.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's been looking like that for a long fucking time, but our Courts should be given the chance to fix this. Electors are chosen and/or vote by 12/14, how do Courts do anything after that? Yet SCOTUS did in 2000?

9
bitterbut_true 9 points ago +10 / -1

50-50

What are the chances of SCOTUS punting? (quite good imo) i.e ACB recusing; Roberts voting with the 'Dem judges' 4-4 decision; so the original PA stands. In otherwords SCOTUS not doing its damn job and letting the country go to hell.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
5
bitterbut_true 5 points ago +5 / -0

For $100 I'll take that bet.

7
learntocode 7 points ago +7 / -0

Quote from the statute:

(b) Watchers shall be permitted to be present when the envelopes containing official absentee ballots are opened and when such ballots are counted and recorded.

From the legal brief filed by the court:

After hearing Attorney Mercer’s testimony and argument from the Campaign and the Board, the trial court rejected the Campaign’s primary argument, raised orally during the hearing, that Section 3146.8(b) of the Election Code – which allows designated watchers or observers of a candidate “to be present when the envelopes containing official absentee ballots and mail-in ballots are opened and when such ballots are counted and recorded,” 25 P.S. § 3146.8(b) – requires that the observers have the opportunity to “meaningfully . . . see the process.” N.T. Hearing, 11/3/20, at 49. In rejecting the argument, the trial court noted that Section 3146.8 contained no language mandating “meaningful observation”; rather, the court interpreted the section as requiring only that the observer be allowed to be “present” at the opening, counting, and recording of the absentee or mail-in ballots. Trial Court Opinion, 11/4/20, at 3-4. The court observed that Attorney Mercer’s testimony that he could not see individual markings on the secrecy envelopes, or determine whether the signature on all the ballot envelopes was properly completed, did not establish a violation of Section 3416.8, inasmuch as that statute “provides for no further specific activities for the watchers to observe, and no activities for the watchers to do other than simply ‘be present’.” Id. at 4. The court opined that, under this section, “[w]atchers are not directed to audit ballots or to verify signatures, to verify voter address[es], or to do anything else that would require a watcher to see the writing or markings on the outside of either [J-116-2020] - 5 envelope, including challenging the ballots or ballot signatures.” Id. Consequently, that same day, the trial court denied the Campaign’s request that the Board modify the work area to allow for closer observation of the ongoing ballot canvassing. The court indicated, however, that it was not discouraging the Board from providing an additional corridor for observers along the side of the tables to watch the proceedings, provided COVID-19 protocols and voter information secrecy protections were maintained.4 Trial Court Order, 11/3/20.

From California, here is a similar statute (THE PROCEEDING IS FROM CALIFORNIA FOR A COMPARISON):

Elections Code - ELEC DIVISION 15. SEMIFINAL OFFICIAL CANVASS, OFFICIAL CANVASS, RECOUNT, AND TIE VOTE PROCEDURES [15000 - 15702] ( Heading of Division 15 amended by Stats. 1998, Ch. 1073, Sec. 21. )

CHAPTER 2. Vote by Mail Ballot Processing [15100 - 15112] ( Heading of Chapter 2 amended by Stats. 2007, Ch. 508, Sec. 85. ) 15102. The official shall appoint a special counting board or boards in numbers that he or she deems adequate to count the vote by mail ballots. The official shall provide for the forms of tally books and the distribution of the duties of the members of the canvassing board.

When the tally is done by hand, there shall be no less than four persons for each office or proposition to be counted. One shall read from the ballot, the second shall keep watch for any error or improper vote, and the other two shall keep the tally. (Amended by Stats. 2007, Ch. 508, Sec. 88. Effective January 1, 2008.)

3
DiscoverAFire 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fire up the helicopters

2
itswood 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want to know how the judge who ruled this way is able to remain on the bench? If shit hits the fan, which I'm starting to think it will, then people like him are on the list...

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great info. "The trial Court," was this PA Supreme Court?

They completely set aside the whole point of the law.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't see how they dont.

39
deleted 39 points ago +39 / -0
25
Wtf_socialismreally 25 points ago +25 / -0

We're going to need a larger prison yard.

I propose Epstein's island.

12
hotdogsforsale 12 points ago +12 / -0

Alcatraz is looking pretty good.

Lord of the flies prison rules?

9
EqualityMatters 9 points ago +9 / -0

Make penal colonies great again!

4
hotdogsforsale 4 points ago +4 / -0

PAPILLON!

6
John_McFly 6 points ago +6 / -0

A federal gallows would reduce overcrowding.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
Wtf_socialismreally 7 points ago +7 / -0

Minecraft has harsher penalties

3
learntocode 3 points ago +3 / -0

Other states do describe physical distances of poll watchers from ballot machines, for example, or state that two counters read votes and make separate tallies. PA law is pretty loosey goosey. Perhaps SCOTUS will agree. They could on the grounds that this is not an airtight law and that the state did obey it by simply putting everything in a big enough room to make it meaningless as a fraud prevention measure.

There must be some other statute regarding an attempt to commit fraud or the act of commiting fraud in the counting of votes?

I wonder what the big brains fighting this insanity have come up with. Oh well, back to work tomorrow.