Sadly, I believe this data from Doug Ross is a false flag. He compiled the data with rounding errors. The data dumps late at night were favoring Biden by increments of 0.001, which is exactly the highest level of precision reported for each candidate's percentage. There's no way from the Edison data to determine a candidate's exact vote count other than multiplying that percentage by the total votes, which can be in the millions. Major loss of precision.
Also when the candidates had the same percentage (i.e. both .494), the reason they kept getting the exact same votes because is he used a weighted average to determine who got what votes. For example if 100 new votes came up, but each candidate still had a ratio of 0.494, he'd give 49.4 (rounded) to each and the rest to the third party. Hopefully this isn't part of Sydney's evidence as it proves nothing other than the Edison data format is poorly implemented
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1328839465255702528?s=19
Let Sidney wield the Kraken and fuck the dems.
In the mean, time, keep up the pressure on the GA lawmakers. On swamp shits McConnell and Graham.
FALL IN LINE BEHIND TRUMP OR ELSE BE ABANDONED.
Thank you for pointing this out. No one seems to be noticing the link to this in Sidney’s tweet.
Came to post this but here we are. Awaiting the kraken.
I think this is the most damaging evidence yet. I created my own thread analysing it here
Sadly, I believe this data from Doug Ross is a false flag. He compiled the data with rounding errors. The data dumps late at night were favoring Biden by increments of 0.001, which is exactly the highest level of precision reported for each candidate's percentage. There's no way from the Edison data to determine a candidate's exact vote count other than multiplying that percentage by the total votes, which can be in the millions. Major loss of precision.
Also when the candidates had the same percentage (i.e. both .494), the reason they kept getting the exact same votes because is he used a weighted average to determine who got what votes. For example if 100 new votes came up, but each candidate still had a ratio of 0.494, he'd give 49.4 (rounded) to each and the rest to the third party. Hopefully this isn't part of Sydney's evidence as it proves nothing other than the Edison data format is poorly implemented