503
Comments (46)
sorted by:
5
MakeAmericaLegendary 5 points ago +5 / -0

Despite the unnecessary negativity in this thread, I think this is a great spot by OP.

3
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not helping but look at these two assholes. I see no negative to this and they're just furious about it for some reason.

4
MakeAmericaLegendary 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, I'm not sure why it's such a problem. I think this is a useful start.

1
C0untR0ckula 1 point ago +1 / -0

there's too much on the line for anons to just sit on their hands, we cant wait for a kraken to save us amirite?

4
C0untR0ckula 4 points ago +4 / -0

thank you anon for sounding the alarm on this, i posted this info as well. fuk the haters. PA is critical to KAG.

I looked at my PA precinct's results from the past for president elections... guess what? vice president hair-sniffer got more votes than barack hussein did. by about 65k compared to 08 and turnout during the china virus was 10% higher. what a load of malarkey.

4
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8uv1Nos/x/c/1Bknrcg5lE

Looks like section 1701 of the PENNSYLVANIA ELECTION CODE Act of Jun.3, 1937 contains this provision - search "1701" and read from the 4th match. Copying and pasting from the doc sucks, so just go read it - I didn't include all the text, but it looks like the snippet from this article, wherever it's from, is accurate. IANAL...

ARTICLE XVII: Recounts and Contests

Section 1701

(a) Recounts

"[...] (a.1), the court of common pleas,or a judge thereof,of the county in which any election district is located in which ballots were used, shall open the ballot box of such election district used at any general, municipal, special or primary election held therein, cause the entire vote thereof to be correctly counted by persons designated by such court or judge, if three qualified electors of the election district shall file, as herein after provided, a petition duly verified by them, alleging that upon information which they consider reliable they believe that fraud or error, although not manifest on the general return of votes made therefrom, was committed in the computation of the votes cast for all offices or for any particular office or offices in such election district, or in the marking of the ballots, or otherwise in connection with such ballots. It shall not be necessary for the petitioners to specify in their petition the particular act of fraud or error which they believe to have been committed, nor to offer evidence to substantiate the allegations of their petition.

Archived link to article

https://archive.is/Sgyg3

-3
FreeRepublic -3 points ago +3 / -6

One district?

3
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every precint

-5
FreeRepublic -5 points ago +2 / -7

What kind of recount?

3
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

A recount of the votes. Like the one in GA where they "discovered" 2600 ballots.

What is your problem with this? Is it better than doing nothing? That's the only question you have to ask.

-6
FreeRepublic -6 points ago +2 / -8

I dont believe youll get a thorough statewide forensic review for $50.

3
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's precinct by precinct.

Why the hell are you and another guy just shitting on this? Does it help or hurt? You're ignorant. The article expands upon this. $50 per person, times 3 for each precinct, would be about $1.3 million. Hurr durr u kan recount the whole kuntry for fifty bucks. Wtf are you talking about.

-5
FreeRepublic -5 points ago +1 / -6

Why didnt trump do that?

2
TownesVanCamp 2 points ago +3 / -1

Recounts are pointless. We want audits

3
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you kidding me? We want every attack possible.

You would rather not have anything than have another attack? Give me a break.

1
TownesVanCamp 1 point ago +2 / -1

A recount is a move to placate the voters recounts do not over turn results they help mix in illegal ballots. The point is to separate illegal votes from the totals, not mix them in. Recounts are not what we want.

Another way to explain is this:

Recounts count everything that has been counted unless a judge has specifically said “don’t count this batch” we don’t want that. We need discovery. Discovery happens in an audit. That is where you will weed out illegal ballots. Don’t be daft

4
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Honestly an awful take.

They just "found" 2600 ballots in a GOP County in Georgia due to a recount. Is it better than nothing? Obviously.

A recount cannot hurt us in any way. Will it fix everything? Of course not.

So fuck off with your sit on your ass attitude. "Don't be daft", eat a dick.

-3
TownesVanCamp -3 points ago +1 / -4

You expect to be stupid and take a shitty tone with people and not have them call you on it? Does your mother have a hair drier? If so, take a bath with it.

3
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're the one who said "don't be daft" and got rude. I didn't take any kind of tone with anyone.

I get it. You'd rather sit on your ass and do nothing, and shit on anything else. Go fuck off.

Again, is this a net positive or not? You're just whining for some reason. Go look at memes.

0
TownesVanCamp 0 points ago +1 / -1

As to looking at memes, how hard is it for you to understand that a recount is included in an audit. That in an audit you literally audit all of the votes then recount. A recount is literally just a recount. That is why recounts don’t typically change the result of an election. We want an audit

2
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Georgia just "found" 2600 votes in a recount. Yes or no, is this better than nothing? It obviously is. It hurts their resources. It gives them something else to worry about. This is like talking to an unimaginative brick wall. Can it help? Yes. Of course we want audits. We can't initiate audits. We can initiate revounts. It's too simple, how are you not understanding this?

0
TownesVanCamp 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your first response to me was asshole. You are a child who wasn’t ever taught how to speak to people.

2
FOUR_MORE_TERMS [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you kidding me? We want every attack possible.

You would rather not have anything than have another attack? Give me a break

That hurt your feelings? Toughen up, pussy.

-5
FreeRepublic -5 points ago +1 / -6

Pretty sure thats bullshit.