8645
Comments (1822)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
114
deleted 114 points ago +123 / -9
105
deleted 105 points ago +105 / -0
27
weltbild 27 points ago +27 / -0

Let me unpack that for you sweetie, first of all it is poor boys and secondly it has been debunked by factcheckers that they are multi ethnic white supremacist.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
FromSethWithLove 4 points ago +4 / -0

This. So much this.

Am I doing it right?

5
BattleKing 5 points ago +6 / -1

Actually we do not tolerate such language here! It's like, so oppressive. Not only poor boys are multi ethnic white supremacists. Toxic masculinity is especially frequent when men abuse the societal hierarchies through their male aggression in order to gain position of higher wealth and status. also calling another person 'sweetie' is not only incredibly demeaning but also an outrageous assumption of gender affiliation that can be disputed by the person that you are talking about and by person I mean any entity, spirit or being that wishes to identify under that name. This categorisation is of course completely voluntary, and I do not wish to impose my oppressive ideology onto the less privileged and will assist to the best of my ability in destructing the very mechanisms my unconscious biases and preconceptions have created to the detriment of so many oppressed victims.

3
weltbild 3 points ago +4 / -1

Its homophobic to demand that a heterosexual person like me can't use a term of endearment like "sweetie" darling. I fucking love science.

9
TheRealPizzaPope 9 points ago +9 / -0

If that’s the case then they’re a pretty good one.

2
red_xi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like the holy spirit during the passover.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1