34
Comments (46)
sorted by:
5
sweet_malaak 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have been folllowing him for a long time. He is full of information and presents it a concise manner.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
MAGA_4EVER 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is he usually right though?

4
Dr0neRec0very 4 points ago +6 / -2

X22 is great! Sometimes he goes overboard with the canned lines, but the writing for the show is outstanding. You're only going to get pushback from the Alex Jonestown cult, because they're trained to reject anything related to Q (even if it's only part time).

1
wwg1wga_canuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought Alex Jones supported q?

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

To be honest, I stopped listening to Alex Jones long before Q, but (the last I heard) he had decided Q was a huge 'cointel pro operation for the pot bellied goblins' or something equally unfounded and retarded. Then, his buddy / Infowars affiliate Jerome Corsi turned on Q, too, about oooohhhh the very fucking minute Q said to watch out for profiteers. xD Weird how that happens. ...and I WAS still listening to Corsi when that happened.

0
mythbusterr 0 points ago +1 / -1

I remember that vividly. It was an awesome takedown. I had a gut feeling something was off about that guy

4
truthforchange 4 points ago +4 / -0

We don't need anymore convincing though.

And we are, by far, the majority in this land.

What we need is results, liberty & justice for all.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
truthforchange 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hope so. But it all ultimately relies on a very small number of people to do the right thing. The fate of all Americans and the world really, up to a handful of people to do the right thing here and not sell out (for billions in chicom cash) or cower to whatever compromising blackmail bad guys may have on them.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

"We don't need anymore convincing though." So you're done hard-selling Alex Jones, then, right? Because no one here needs to be "red pilled" and that's his entire resume'.

2
truthforchange 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't know wtf you're even on about. Nobody here is buying dick pills from Alex Jones red, blue, gold or otherwise.

I'm saying this "HOOOLLLLLLLLLD & REFRESH THE PAGE!" stuff is nonsense. People are going to wind up holding and losing everything on these false champions. How many false champions have people bet and lost on already?

Why do you think COVID is making a resurgence right now? They want to run down the clock and prevent people from travelling and gathering.

Everyone seems to knows exactly whats happening here. Yet...

3
Dr0neRec0very 3 points ago +5 / -2

Now, with Jones, I do see a problem that I don't hear from Q sources: Infowars isn't consistently supportive of the president and they have a long history of co-opting protests into Infowars marketing events. The Q people are steadfastly supportive of the president and they aren't trying to generate protests just to promote themselves.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

"Nobody here is buying dick pills from Alex Jones" You're full'uh crap. Alex Jones posts get THOUSANDS of likes on this page and those posts get "stickied" at least a few times a week. I love this site, but there are HORDES of Jonestards who frequent The Donald. That's what I'm "on about".

2
truthforchange 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's keep it simple. Why are we even talking about Alex Jones? Is Alex Jones at odds with whoever this X22 super convincer is or something and you assume one must be on one team or the other?

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

"one must be on one team or the other?" I think so. Here's an example of why that is: https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ijwehYzYHJq/ If you find Q saying crap like this, I'd like to hear it.

2
truthforchange 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I remember the whole F Trump thing from Alex way back when. I lost most interest in him long before that. There was a moment when I got sick of the supplement advertisements and testimonials which to me seemed to insult the intelligence of any intelligent listeners. Alex is a human being full of faults though. He's been doing this for a LONG time and I think that deserves some respect and acknowledgement. I've only recently been listening to him again now and then. Thank god for the "skip ahead 10 seconds" button though.

When replying, I didn't even know who X22 is. All I was replying to was:

He is good at convincing non believers of the truth

My point is, nobody here needs convincing. We get it. 70+ million of us and our too-young-to-vote families get it. The question is, if the judges who will be looking at all these "evidences" of fraud in these cases are already corrupted, what happens from there?

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

"Is Alex Jones at odds with" Alex Jones is at odds with anyone who isn't driving traffic to Infowars. Period... and yes: his fanboys are trained to attack Q infotainers.

2
truthforchange 2 points ago +2 / -0

Q is a larp and his followers won't accept any challenges to any proofs though. I've experienced that on my own back when Q published the AF1 photo trying to pass him/herself off as having (((ACCESS))). We found where the AF1 photo originated from, discussed it, and all of the Q T-shirt hockers cried for days. Q went into hiding for how long after the AF1 photo bust? And then popped out again when dust settled and acted like nothing ever happened. Q is a funny guy. BUUUUT Q is obviously intelligent, knows his global "conspiracies" and is able to weave about and connect those dots well enough to keep people interested and buying Beefy T's. So that's cool.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

"Q is a larp" lol How about YOU are a larp. Change my mind.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

Seriously, though... "I've experienced that on my own back when Q published" I hear'ya. There are plenty of people who have had that reaction to Q. I would suggest that, perhaps:

You're overly engaged in the material due to your hopes for justice. Treat it as entertainment. It's healthier. It's complex enough to be a good mental exercise.

You may or may not have overestimated your own ability to validate or invalidate the material. There are, as you know, standard responses to debunking, which usually go something like, 'Well, we're also witnessing some of the disinformation that's being used to manipulate the baddies who ARE reading, too.' I would suggest considering the IMPACT of the faulty information on parties other than yourselves. To you, it's frustrating and an annoyance. What would the disinformation mean to, say, House Intel Chief Adam Schitt, with his bag of personal wrong-doings, if he happened to nervously read it and take it semi-seriously? Probably, the impact would be very different! Probably, his comrades would repeatedly DEMAND that Q be censored and denounced by leaders without much discussion of content. Probably, scads of libtards would be trained to claim Q to be a larp as often as possible in social media.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

"Why are we even talking about Alex Jones?" I just told you. Feel free to review the thread, though!

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

"these false champions" You're going overboard worrying about that, because:

-You don't understand the difference between reporting of events and subjective analysis.

-None of these people have any real power, anyway. Thus, they will "lose" or "win" exactly the same quantity of sheckles regardless of which infotainer they indulge.

2
truthforchange 2 points ago +2 / -0

how many dozens of people doing subjective analysis dozens of times does it take before they realize.... wow... wrong every time. Nothing happening except America getting closer and closer to communism.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

"wow... wrong every time." That's a pretty extraordinary exaggeration, even if there was such a thing as a "correct" opinion (there isn't). Fortune tellers are entertainment. Opinions that later become facts are still only unsubstantiated opinions when they're first shared. They can't become facts until they occur, of course. There is no "truth" somewhere in 'pre-existence', waiting to leap out of hiding. Opinions are just opinions and fortune tellers are just fortune tellers: they are never fact-tellers. It's only entertainment.

2
truthforchange 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's only entertainment.

Now that's the truth! One mans distraction is undoubtedly another's entertainment. And with that, I realize I have a job and since the (((happening))) is not happening today, I guess tomorrow I will go to work Night!

3
Dr0neRec0very 3 points ago +5 / -2

Fair enough. I work at will and that will be through the night, while I listen to X22 Report.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +4 / -2

"Nothing happening except America getting closer and closer to communism." Asserting that we can only have infotainment at the expense of preparedness is a false dilemma. We can most certainly have both entertainment and preparedness. I would take caution with that point of view, because very real cult leaders and religious profiteers use similar ploys: 'you can only be saved by giving up X, Y and Z. If you don't stop listening to that rock music (or whatever), you're going to hell!!!' Same false dilemma: different nouns and verbs.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
truthforchange 2 points ago +2 / -0

So does Qanon really. But I mean... full on silkscreening hanes beefy-t larp though.

4
Dr0neRec0very 4 points ago +6 / -2

That guy is brilliant, but I can imagine what a tough time you have following it.

3
Dr0neRec0very 3 points ago +5 / -2

So there's a reason we're not supposed to trust President Trump's plan? I call Rule #1 on that line. Q has never said, "trust JOE'S plan" or "trust Alex's plan". THE plan belongs to President Trump, so what's your problem, exactly? It's not like you can do anything about it, anyway.