On the PA supreme court stating that observers must be allowed "in the room" while ballots are counted, yet the law does not state a distance. A wise lawyer might take that statement, and ask the judge to repeat what he said. After the judge has done so, should ask for a moment to collect his thoughts, walk to the corner of the room, unzip his pants, and with a hidden bottle of water, begin to act as though he is pissing on the wall. When the judge orders the bailiff to place him in cuffs, simply zip up, ask why he should be arrested, threaten the bailiff with assault if he touches him without probable cause. Then turn to the judge and ask, what exactly do you think you observed just now. You are in the room. Could you not see exactly what happened, or did you get fleeced, based on your own interpretation of the law?
Comments (5)
sorted by:
Man - that’s some Chris Farley stuff right there but that would be great... still think that lawyer would get arrested though! 🤷♂️
If you're not close enough to verify signatures/actually audit the ballots correctly then it is illegal. They're not fucking bird watching, by law they need to be able to observe the ballots. Covid was an excuse to keep them away so they could cheat.
That is my point
😕👆
The "room" in Philly was 40,000 sq ft, right? That makes it pathetic to think one can "observe" from anywhere in the room.
I have to hope that with the comments lately from Sidney and Lyn, they've got more to reveal than just this observation fiasco.
Otherwise, it's going to be our turn to burn shit down. And I don't think patriots will do it stupidly and randomly like the enemy does.