501
Comments (27)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
errydaktal 2 points ago +2 / -0

'An MIT professor's survey found that Republicans think domestic hackers of the voting system are more likely than foreigners; Democrats think the opposite.'

Stanford and Wisconsin researchers in 2019 found that only 89% of voters disapprove if a foreign country would "hack into voting machines and change the official vote count to give [a] candidate extra votes" and the candidate wins. This 89% disapproval is not much more than the 88% who disapprove of a foreign country making campaign contributions and 78-84% against them spreading lies. Only 73-79% disapprove if their party got help, while 94-95% disapprove of the other party getting help. If a foreign country thought about interfering, but did not, 21% distrust the results anyway. This rises only to 84% distrusting final results after a foreign country hacked and changed results.

A Monmouth University poll in May 2019 found that 73% thought Russia interfered in the 2016 election (not necessarily by hacking), 49% thought it damaged American democracy a lot, 57% thought Russia interfered in the 2018 election, and 60% thought the US government is not doing enough to stop it. Margin of error is ±3.5'

1
Illinois4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol you need to stop reading the fake polls

1
benfordslaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

polls are fake and discredited. they completely miss the silent majority (incompetent and malicious "researchers")

1
King5150 1 point ago +1 / -0

these polls are real 100% legit but they just sampled low information people in Dem run states and this is why polling analytics are going the way of the MSM, they have been hijacked by liberals with commie blood in their veins.

2
benfordslaw 2 points ago +2 / -0

yep. but the assumptions they make in what the electorate constitutes are ridiculous and impossible. as it, the pollsters' bias consistently favors Democrats and liberals in recent years.