Oooh, this is a piece of linguistic manipulation right here. Not very clever, though, for anyone with an IQ above 60.
"Let's skip the entire question of whether he did something illegal or not, to a question that bears an obvious answer that everyone can agree on. In the process, that legitimizes the first question because it automatically presumes guilt."
wtf is he talking about? just more lefty scumbag projecting their own shit again ?FUCK!! I AM SO FUCKING OVER THESE FUCKING INSANE FUCKS ,LETS JUST KILL EM ALL
That fucking traitor need to be put in-front of a firing squad!
Oooh, this is a piece of linguistic manipulation right here. Not very clever, though, for anyone with an IQ above 60.
"Let's skip the entire question of whether he did something illegal or not, to a question that bears an obvious answer that everyone can agree on. In the process, that legitimizes the first question because it automatically presumes guilt."
It seems as you say, a presumed guilt, but the exercise of looking until the presumed guilt can be substantiated, one way or the other.
Past behavior is the best prediction of future behavior.
I never trust anyone named "Weissman." I've only known it to be a villain's name.
That precedent has been set over and over already
This applies to Obama too, yeah?
let your enemies exposes themselves for all to see
So...
He’s saying that Obama should be investigated and charged?
I sure hope someone is retweeting and tagging barry
What laws did he break Andrew, tell us.
wtf is he talking about? just more lefty scumbag projecting their own shit again ?FUCK!! I AM SO FUCKING OVER THESE FUCKING INSANE FUCKS ,LETS JUST KILL EM ALL
What he means: We will investigate him until we find something, and even if we don't, we've made something up before and we'll do it again.