At 53 minutes in, he confirms my assertion.
However, he changed his analysis from straight lines to parabolas, which makes much more sense. Under the original theory of expecting a horizontal line, my critique was accurate, at least for the right side of the chart.
The big take-way is really that the left side of the graph appears truncated, or the entire dataset was shifted left. Meaning, the ratio of straight party D vs R is manipulated in favor of D.
It helps to see 'healthy' datasets.
I don't know what's up with Wayne though.
For those down-voting me for explaining the logic, take an aspirin.
Shiva answers you in his newer video
https://youtu.be/R8xb6qJKJqU
At 53 minutes in, he confirms my assertion.
However, he changed his analysis from straight lines to parabolas, which makes much more sense. Under the original theory of expecting a horizontal line, my critique was accurate, at least for the right side of the chart.
The big take-way is really that the left side of the graph appears truncated, or the entire dataset was shifted left. Meaning, the ratio of straight party D vs R is manipulated in favor of D.
It helps to see 'healthy' datasets.
I don't know what's up with Wayne though.
For those down-voting me for explaining the logic, take an aspirin.