1442
Comments (29)
sorted by:
13
Pepbrandt 13 points ago +13 / -0

James Woods, Lin Wood 2024!

Lin was on fire in the interview. A true patriot.

9
deleted 9 points ago +16 / -7
5
dumdumexpress 5 points ago +6 / -1

I'm on a ship that's going down, no WAY am I looking to you for your steely resolve.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
8
farfiman 8 points ago +21 / -13

Not buying it. Highest anyone got in recent history landslides is about 60 ( Reagan, Nixon). This kind of talk discredits him.

10
farfiman 10 points ago +14 / -4

To the downvoter. For Trump to win 70% and still lose by fraud ... they would have to cheat by an impossible amount. Yes there was fraud- possible even a few million if you check all states. There WASN'T fraud of 20 million votes.

11
WarGreymon77 11 points ago +11 / -0

I disagree. They were planning to cheat from the get-go, but they woefully underestimated how many fake ballots they would need to counter the MAGA turnout. They overdid it, resulting in the absolutely preposterous popular vote totals. There's no way in hell Pedo Joe got more votes than any other President in history. The math in this election simply does not add up. Either there's a bunch of fake paper ballots (the stopped-count, 5 AM hauls in the vans, wagons, coolers) or the machines flipped votes en masse, or both. Simply put, they overdid it and exposed themselves. Just my theory.

0
vongregormench 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is just no way to cheat that much with fake ballots. They would have had to exceed the number of registered voters by almost double in some places. The only way to get over a 40 point vote deficit is to destroy 20 million Trump votes.

3
catfoodsoup 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is literally what Dominion sofware, and hackers – and STAFF, according to the manuals – can do. Delete votes. Physically print over ballots. Reshuffle them to a chosen candidate. Heck, apparently you can just walk out with a memory stick full of ballots in your pocket and say "whoopsiesss"

1
kek_mate 1 point ago +1 / -0

incorrect. There were many instances of vote deduction from ALL candidates. Why does one do that? So that the %'s remain semi consistent, the votes are then trickled back in all for one candidate.

With the correct algorithm I can make a 100% for candidate A election turn into a 60% for candidate B without going over the maximum eligible voter count.

7
rplgn 7 points ago +8 / -1

The audio confirms the 70% claim you have stated. He goes on to confirm the 400 EV claim too. So very fair to say that we could be onto something.

12
farfiman 12 points ago +12 / -0

Bush had 426 ev with only 53% of the vote. So theoretically that is more possible.

8
Milkpowder44 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, Trump was running against a corrupt, demented pedo who didn't campaign.

2
beef-tits 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden couldnt campaign for the fact he stumbles over a sentence. You know his handlers have a leash on his sniffing which must be driving Joe crazy, either that or his granddaughter is in the basement too.

1
farfiman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree with all of that.

4
FEMAcampswimteam 4 points ago +5 / -1

We gained about 100 million more citizens since the 80s so a 10% increase its that far fetched, not including illegals voting and illegal votes. This goes to finding all these districts finding out they exceeding 100% voter turnout which is all out fraud.

4
farfiman 4 points ago +4 / -0

We are talking percentages- not total votes.

3
rplgn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exciting isnt it. Maybe it is FoS or a tactical nuke. If LLinWood even confirms this, it does shed a little bit more hope for a few days. This is how rightheous consent-until-doubted with a temporal factor works. But I want to stress if he turns out wrong, being played, making Trump look really really bad then I will leave TD.win forever.

1
uzi5v2 1 point ago +1 / -0

In recent history they also had Dominion, and likely other precursors, to keep away those pesky landslides that us plebs wanted.

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
4
BetsyRossRocks 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just learned yesterday Lin Wood was also the lawyer who defended Richard Jewell. Guess I am living under a rock!

2
GlacialSpeed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Must be patient...must be patient....must be patient....

This will be the longest November ever....

2
MAG_n_KAG 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are at the point where we have to absolutely rely on that tick tocking "magic bullet". We are getting our asses kicked and our only hope comes in the form of "hold the line!!" and "just wait" and "itll be irrefutable" and so on.

Time is running out. Whatever they have better be good, or rather, better than good. The evidence isnt for us and other fair minded people. Its for the swamp, and its TDS stricken useful idiots.

1
Patroklos_Maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

70% popular vote really?

1
Skippy737 1 point ago +3 / -2

Ugh gateway pundit.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lin Wood is at the top of his game, but elections are not his area of expertise. I would guess that he is extrapolating from information he knows and getting the number wrong (probably by one order of magnitude). I think the statistical anomalies are pointing to a fraud that is under a 10% change.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s a very big claim and kind of hard to believe. There has never been a win by that percentage as far as I’m aware. The number of fake votes to overcome that margin would be staggering.