All of this statistical evidence. All of the anomalies that, to a statistician or a pattern analysis expert are seen as 99.99% evidence of fraud and wrongdoing... You KNOW how LONG the list is...

And I cannot for the life of me see how any of it changes anything.

We are left wrangling over legal issues with state constitutions while the PROOF has no court that will hear the statistical evidence.

That's the way this feels to me.

Someone tell me what COURT you go to with statistical anomalies.