Yes, and what he's also saying is not to be deceived or chaffed away by the counter-argument that "that's just because they stopped tracking this in order to focus resources on The Varus!"
It only just occurred to me while typing another comment that there may be another reason. Obviously masks, social distancing, lockdowns, and all the other bullshit will distort those numbers, and a greater likelihood to seek testing might also distort them. Still, distorted data where they know why it was distorted is better than no data at all. But if the distortions aren't significant, what it could really prove is that the masks and everything else are making no real impact on any of this.
Remember, CDC decided they would not track flu this year.
The reason is obviously to inflate the WuFlu numbers.
They need an excuse for in the future why the numbers nose-dived.
So what you are saying is that there is exactly zero flu cases, thus reinforcing OPs point?
Yes, and what he's also saying is not to be deceived or chaffed away by the counter-argument that "that's just because they stopped tracking this in order to focus resources on The Varus!"
Of course they did.
No. I’m saying that they decided not to track it. Zero flu tracking this season. I believe it is to inflate Wuflu numbers.
If you can find some stats that prove the flu still exists, I'd love to see them :p
No, no. I can’t They aren’t tracking. No such thing as the flu anymore (if you ask the gov’t) Only Wuflu.
It only just occurred to me while typing another comment that there may be another reason. Obviously masks, social distancing, lockdowns, and all the other bullshit will distort those numbers, and a greater likelihood to seek testing might also distort them. Still, distorted data where they know why it was distorted is better than no data at all. But if the distortions aren't significant, what it could really prove is that the masks and everything else are making no real impact on any of this.
How convenient...