Because they didn't pre-print enough fake ones. Because they didn't implement enough vote switching in the software. Because Trump won in a fucking landslide.
Honestly some of it could be genuine incompetence as well, but that's still not acceptable.
I've read through the user manuals and training guides. The UX and design of the product is so god awful, that even someone trying to be honest could easily make mistakes like this.
Or grassroots malice. There's so many democrats who hate Trump so much many of them who weren't closely monitored just did individual level fraud.
These ballots are mostly Biden, run them through again. This neighborhood is mostly R so don't deliver their ballots, and take a video burning them in the backyard. That kind of thing.
Ironically that's where lots of the 500+ affidavits from people who saw this kind of individual fraud came from, people see all this evidence and demand hand recount, and the real fraudsters are like 'oh shit we'll get caught in a hand recount'.
Because they didn't pre-print enough fake ones. Because they didn't implement enough vote switching in the software. Because Trump won in a fucking landslide.
You sir, are fucking correct.
Honestly some of it could be genuine incompetence as well, but that's still not acceptable.
I've read through the user manuals and training guides. The UX and design of the product is so god awful, that even someone trying to be honest could easily make mistakes like this.
Or grassroots malice. There's so many democrats who hate Trump so much many of them who weren't closely monitored just did individual level fraud.
These ballots are mostly Biden, run them through again. This neighborhood is mostly R so don't deliver their ballots, and take a video burning them in the backyard. That kind of thing.
Ironically that's where lots of the 500+ affidavits from people who saw this kind of individual fraud came from, people see all this evidence and demand hand recount, and the real fraudsters are like 'oh shit we'll get caught in a hand recount'.
Sounds like a great setup for plausible deniability.