8019 () posted 148 days ago by ShillHunter 148 days ago by ShillHunter +8019 / -0 226 comments share 226 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (226) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 51 ▼ – ontothefuture 51 points 148 days ago +51 / -0 Oh shit. I didn't know they could actually print, that explains a lot. Were they all mail in ballots? permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 148 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 4 ▼ – fox86 4 points 148 days ago +4 / -0 the term you're looking for is thermal printing, like receipts; these are not thermal paper ballots.it just prints in the spot with toner more than likely permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – cheesecake2 3 points 148 days ago +3 / -0 I wonder if it would be possible to do an analysis on the marked spot to see if the the chemical matches the printer ink versus a pen/ marker permalink parent save report block reply
Oh shit. I didn't know they could actually print, that explains a lot. Were they all mail in ballots?
the term you're looking for is thermal printing, like receipts; these are not thermal paper ballots.it just prints in the spot with toner more than likely
I wonder if it would be possible to do an analysis on the marked spot to see if the the chemical matches the printer ink versus a pen/ marker