When they get to the SCOTUS, they're going to present all the evidence of fraud in an attempt to overturn something
That something could be:
Overturning just the fraudulent ballots that could change the outcome of an election.
Overturning just the states in question that could change the outcome of an election.
Overturning the entire election itself.
SCOTUS doesn't want to certify who's the winner of an election, so if enough irregularity and/or fraud is given to them that they're convinced, Amendment 12 turns the election to the states. Each of our 50 states will get one vote and they must vote under party lines. California's 55 electors becomes 1 state vote for a democrat whereas Alaska's 3 electors becomes 1 state vote for a republican.
Ergo, Trump 4 more years. That's why he's fighting this.
What do you mean exactly by “this is the beginning”?
What is the beginning? The beginning of what?
When they get to the SCOTUS, they're going to present all the evidence of fraud in an attempt to overturn something
That something could be: Overturning just the fraudulent ballots that could change the outcome of an election. Overturning just the states in question that could change the outcome of an election. Overturning the entire election itself.
SCOTUS doesn't want to certify who's the winner of an election, so if enough irregularity and/or fraud is given to them that they're convinced, Amendment 12 turns the election to the states. Each of our 50 states will get one vote and they must vote under party lines. California's 55 electors becomes 1 state vote for a democrat whereas Alaska's 3 electors becomes 1 state vote for a republican.
Ergo, Trump 4 more years. That's why he's fighting this.
Is that true, that they must vote along party lines? That would be a gamechanger.
Sorry, I meant 30 not 37.
But the part about voting along party lines IS very true as it's part of the 12th.