FRAUD MAIL IN BALLOTS CAN BE EASILY IDENTIFIED UNDER MICROSCOPE TO SEE PRINTER MARKINGS (NOT PEN)
(media.patriots.win)
posted ago by SHIT
+840 / -0
Comments (34)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
Front
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
I mean, depending on DPI you can see it with the naked eye or a magnifying glass.
Came here to say exactly that. You can tell printer vs. ink with just an eyeball test
almost all printers today print a secret pattern on your printouts in Yellow ink so that it is not visible. If you look at a print under blue light it should show a pattern of tiny yellow dots that would show the make/model/serial number of the printer used. It may even also show the date that it was printed.
If someone could get a hold of a ballot and check it under blue light you could prove definitively if it was printed after election day
Wouldn't even need to be after election day - just after the day that they officially stopped printing the genuinely legitimate ones for mailing out.
Is it hard for people to tell the difference between printed ink and pen ink? Using a pen on paper damages and deforms the paper. You should even be able to FEEL the difference.
yea, ballpoint indents... this type of fraud is so blatant that even a 12 year old could probably suss this out
So long as you keep seeing things clearly and processing it correctly, emotional swings are ok.
You are accurate and yes we are having a down time but that is because we want as Pedes to see the good in ALL people and believe people are good at heart.
GROW UP. SLASH BURN DESTROY every Libertard at every corner. Take no prisoners and give no quarter. This is your country you are fighting for. Get a pair or get out of the way. You are on the TRUMP TRAIN and there are no breaks or brakes. When they call you a RACIST you call them a PEDIPHILE. When they say they are not a pediphle you say ALL DEMOCRATS ARE PEDIPHILES and then start listing off all the players. Same with any BLM or ANTIFIA scum. Same tactic, same results. Pedes FIGHT TO WIN AND WIN AGAIN. We have you back but you have to have a backbone and use it.
WWG1WGA
Only hundreds? We need thousands damn it.
right, but this is one observer
Yes. The suit has affidavits from multiple observers at multiple sites that saw the fraudulent ballots.
Hundreds at a time.
No, they re-scanned the same ballots.
I think these ballots are printed for the recount.
MADE IN CHINA
JO BI DENG LOVE CHINA LONG TIME
Yu ritter boi reff his raptop hea. Ooo big truburu fo yuuuu!
had to speak this out loud 🤣
What a fucking sham. Lady Liberty is weeping right now.
In Many videos I've seen stacks of flat ballots, was wondering when someone would bring this up
I've heard (PA vote) that they have stacks of blank, unfolded ballots to replace damaged ballots that wouldn't scan through the machines. That's what one of those videos with a ballot counter filling out 6 ballots herself in an hour on camera was supposed to be doing when we saw the video. Could be the same thing, could be a scam.
You have the sauce? This is Lin's Georgia suit, no?
The copy I saw didn't have this in it, but had several other affidavits. Can you send a link?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4f5gvx6oh9zskvf/2020-11-17%20TRO%20Motion%20with%20Exhibits.PDF?dl=0
I didn't find the one OP posted but
page 77 (recount) page 185 (recount)
Yes it really seems they printed new ballots for the recount to get the numbers reported by Dominion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code
They should take out all suspicious ballots and check the printer codes and they might even be able to check the ink or even paper used with IR spectroscopy and if it's rampant enough the entire fucking election should be thrown out
This stuff takes time. Need somebody to step in and stop certification. SOS said he would certify this evening, then it goes to Kemp to either certify or refuse and call in the legislature. We will see what Kemp is made of if he can stand up to his buddies.
Oh fuck that’s huge
Anyone got the link to this one? Couldn't find it in the Wood filing I was looking at. The problem with all the lawsuits is that it's difficult to keep the affidavits straight and together.
Has anyone undertaken an effort in that vein?
Bet these are the bulk of what was counted after Election Day.
No creases ballots during the recount - probably printed just for the recount to match the reported number by Dominion.
My theory - that's why GA announced the recount without a fight - they got together decided to print the ballots so it matches the vote count and do a recount.