8114
Comments (912)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
36
Aspielogic2 36 points ago +36 / -0

That's why they had to give the name COVID-19 to this Coronavirus strain.

Each year, Coronaviruses are responsible for 37-45% of all colds (it may be even higher, because they only ever tested people who needed a Doctor/hospital). Politically speaking, ain't nobody gonna get their panties in a wad for the Common Cold.

COVID does have a sligtly higher incidence of lower lung involvement than other Coronavirus strains (which tend to sit in the upper lungs). That is the main difference (from a body perspective) between 19 and the other strains.

BUT, you could never create a 'Deadly Pandemic' scare by only using the proper term 'Coronavirus' because too many people know it's the technical name for the Common Cold.

Why nobody asks about the other 18 Coronavirus strains is beyond me.

19
MaxineWaters4Prez 19 points ago +19 / -0

There are strains above 19 also. Or at least a 20 according to the disinfectant wipes we use at work. And it was on the label before the Shanghai Sniffles came about.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +3 / -6
19
ZeroDeltaTango 19 points ago +20 / -1

I find it weird that medical supplies marked for dealing with "COVID 19" were being produced in 2015.

But that's none of my business

13
Aspielogic2 13 points ago +13 / -0

In May, I went on the Canadian Gov purchasing site (less entries than US). It showed that they had purchased Covid 19 test kits in 2017 (arrived 2018).

I went back 2 weeks ago to print it off to make a meme about 'Plandemic BS' - and it no longer says Covid 19 Test Kits.

There is now just a reference number 300215 (which I only knew to look for b/c of a Doctor in Europe saying those Gov't's ALSO changed the Test Kits Purchase Titles in THEIR Gov't archives).

3
R3lyk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Check this out, ultimate proof covid 91 was planned. They talk about exactly what you're saying.

2
neverendum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Try the URL in Wayback Machine, it may have snapshots of the webpage as it was back then. Would be interesting if they have changed it.

5
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 5 points ago +5 / -0

sauce?

3
ZeroDeltaTango 3 points ago +3 / -0

Happy to.

http://tapnewswire.com/2020/09/ultimate-proof-covid-19-was-planned-to-usher-in-the-new-world-order/

Scroll to Nos. 3 and 4, but the whole article is intense. Share far and wide!

4
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 4 points ago +4 / -0

W T A F ! ?

6
800080 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why nobody asks about the other 18 Coronavirus strains is beyond me.

The '-19' is a designation for 2019 the year it was first observed. There are a lot more strains than that. They think they have found two variants of this wuflu, one seemed to be more prevalent in the West Coast USA the other East Coast USA, possibly Boston, with BioGen Employees.

Viruses evolve. When they become less contagious or less harmful they just 'go away' and no one knows why. Seriously. They don't know why.

2
The_Emperor 2 points ago +2 / -0

The -19 is for the year of discovery (2019) not the number of F coronaviruses