Jesus Christ himself would have most likely received a ban on christian subreddits if we're being honest. He drove the money changers in the temple with a whip that he took the time and energy to make. Think that would be considered uncharitable to them? Their definition of uncharitable is any position that goes against what they believe.
Jesus was also saying stuff in direct conflict with the written religious law and the dictates of the priests/rabbis. He would have definitely been banned right before being crucified.
Banning is modern day crucifixion. back then they didn't like what someone said so they nailed them to crosses. In some cases if the accused hanging on the cross would renounce what they said they were let down and allowed to live
Jesus Christ himself would have most likely received a ban on christian subreddits if we're being honest. He drove the money changers in the temple with a whip that he took the time and energy to make. Think that would be considered uncharitable to them? Their definition of uncharitable is any position that goes against what they believe.
Jesus was also saying stuff in direct conflict with the written religious law and the dictates of the priests/rabbis. He would have definitely been banned right before being crucified.
Banning is modern day crucifixion. back then they didn't like what someone said so they nailed them to crosses. In some cases if the accused hanging on the cross would renounce what they said they were let down and allowed to live
"and on the third day he was unbanned on Twitter"