16
posted ago by ancientarchitect369 ago by ancientarchitect369 +16 / -0

I posted this in a comment on a post, but decided it was worth making it's own post for.

"What I don't get is the constant division when it comes to Q. Not a "believer" in Q personally, but from what I understand, we want the same things. There are only two main sides here, us (who want the fall of the corrupt system and the elites, etc), and the people who are/follow the elites, and want the existence of this corrupt system to continue.

Any division between the various factions of "us" (the Q people and the regular "us" for example), weakens "us" as a whole. We need to start acting like we're unified, all of us. If all of us are unified without any internal fighting, we cannot possibly fail, because we outnumber the enemy by far."

Comments (5)
sorted by:
2
Lapstrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think there is any possibility that Q is a larp or a foreign bad actor, unless you are willing to believe that the former Director of National Intelligence and National Security Advisor is so stupid that he would blindly follow someone on the internet when he didn't know who they were.

https://i.maga.host/giFIV5a.png

https://i.maga.host/zpUEWUA.png

1
Rreidy8286 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats whats always stopped me from writing it off entireley. Id have to say im undecided on it and there certainly are things that are true. Hasn't flynn made a few posts insinuating he believes it? I dont know theres just so much going on its hard to tell whats what for sure. Edit those pics are what i was talking about and i think ive seen another flynn one...... His involvement is what always brings me back to wondering if its true.

2
Lapstrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1279590652200849409

At the end, General Flynn and his family all recite the Q mantra

Where we go one, we go all.

It is not an insinuation. It is a public declaration.

2
Rreidy8286 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wasnt saying in in a sarcastic way i just couldnt think of a better word at the time to imply that he is involved with it.

Along with flynns involvement another thing that makes me believe is the fact it was censored. What we currently see being censored is true information but they just labeled so what made the qanon groups any different? I they thought it was some mindless conspiracy with no truth why would they not just lable them as misleading but outright ban it ? Makes me think there is something to it and they dont want anyone to see it. What makes it any different from the numerous other conspiracy groups on their platforms? As far as i cant tell the only difference is this one required it to be cleansed from the site. That alone makes me think but along with flynn being apart of it really does. Thanks for the vid.

1
nuhbin 1 point ago +1 / -0

none of us know each other, trust each other, or have any way to find out if the other people believe what they're saying

how can we have unity when one wing wants to do nothing and "trust the plan", and the other wing wants to "sell their cloaks" "dredge the lake" and water a certain tree

there will always be a lack of unity because we aren't all the same... the best bet is to talk about the argument and not the person

honestly though the damage is already done... we could have probably financed out own election recounts and audits if we had back all the money people spent on Q shirts, and if the rest of us had been as engaged and vocal as the Q people we might have moved the needle a lot farther on the issues that matter (immigration, voter ID, taxes, ending wars, etc)