1923
()
posted ago by Termus ago by Termus +1923 / -0
Comments (57)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
57
FireannDireach 57 points ago +57 / -0

government officials and activists announced a proposal to “reset” the global economy. Instead of traditional capitalism, the high-profile group said the world should adopt more socialistic policies, such as wealth taxes, additional regulations and massive Green New Deal-like government programs.

There it is, in black and white. They're failing their attempt to destroy the US (for 4 years, anyway), so they're going all in with the rest of the world.

Game on. WWIII has officially started. Capitalism vs. Socialism.

It's horrifically hilarious that Prince Charles is being used to sell it, because his entire existence depends on capitalism. He survives from the Royal Trust, which is capitalistic investments and ownership.

So, Chuckie, you going to renounce your trust fund, and get a job? And step down from your birthright, when your mother dies? Because monarchy doesn't work with socialism.

23
greenman2020 23 points ago +24 / -1

Maybe they really did kill Princess Diana? Princess Diana was actually a good person could be why they got rid of her. She wasn't evil like they are. I have hope for her son prince Williams. He seems like he could be a good person.

15
Groupthinkgroupthink 15 points ago +15 / -0

Diana wasn't a good person.

She was a silly girl that had bi-polar issues, she constantly threw her toys after getting exactly what she wanted and was constantly having affairs.

That interview she gave 'I'm tired of there being three in this marriage.' was a lie, it was her having the affair at the time -- is the same constant liberal projection and she was doing it.

Did she do a lot of charity? Sure, but that's because she had near limitless money and nothing better to do and loved the attention it gave her, spending tax payers money.

Do you know what good parents don't do? Speed in a limo completely drunk while the children are in the care of someone else -- she was being followed by the paparazzi because after she left Charles she led such an excessive life style.

The image most people have of Diana is a completely made up one she paid PR firms to present.

Edit: Remember, the Marxist media always elevate terrible-people in place of moral virtues, to subvert them.

4
meals23 4 points ago +4 / -0

Diana was always going to die young. If it wasn't the way she went, would've been an OD sooner or later

That said the royal family 100% had her killed

10
FireannDireach 10 points ago +10 / -0

If there's still a throne to sit on by the time Charles keels over. I wouldn't be shocked if Charles is dumb/corrupted enough to step down and disband the whole thing when the Queen dies.

The monarchy has always been up to it's eyebrows in scandal and corruption, nothing would shock me about those inbred grifters. But Charles? I could see him doing away with all of it, to appease his globalist/muslim puppetmasters.

3
Polygauge 3 points ago +4 / -1

I hope so.

Considering The Queen owns 1/6th of the world as far as land is concerned

They own England, Australia, and all of Canada

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
xBigCoffinHunter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doubt it.

0
BillBarrsSkelatons 0 points ago +1 / -1

They did!

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
5
NYCforTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

The royal family sickens me. They duped everyone to love them and avoided persecution (unlike the Romanovs). Wealth inequality is bad but look at this picture of the queen with all her jewels! Look at this adorable family, where no one will ever have to work a day in their lives! Now pay your taxes and put on a mask like good peasants.

Definitely some master manipulation went down.

2
fjobb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya really. Why does no one ever seem to care that its always these people that live in fantasy land already, telling everyone else they have it too good and they need to sacrifice everything. Like does anyone honestly believe that fuckface here, Brad Pitt or high government officials plan to join in the suffering/austerity that they seem to want to impose on everyone else? I don't fucking think so.

You know who I would be willing to sacrifice for if they said it was necessary? Trump or a leader like him. Guy has sacrificed his reputation(among tds afflicted, no one hated him until he ran) a lot of net worth, his kids targeted, and most likely worse if he gets removed from this coup they are trying to do. That inspires people. Sacrifice because the useless “heir apparent”, who has never and will never sacrifice anything himself said to? Get fucked, you gonna have to force that one at the end of a gun, I’m certainly not doing it willingly.

1
Blurpy 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is all for it, because they'll offer him an exemption as a Party member.