Hey guys, remember that time Wisconsin had to stop counting votes because they ran out of ink?
(media.patriots.win)
🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
Comments (103)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Why do you need INK to COUNT!!!???!!!
"Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, to count the ballots?" -Dems, probably
Interesting article on this: https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2018/10/16/design-flaw-in-dominion-imagecast-evolution-voting-machine/
Good article.
But.....why??? Cool, you can make a machine do that, but good lord, why??
...
I did read somewhere that the blind Georgia demographic was all in for Biden....it was like 98.9%...and for some reason they all refused to vote down ballot.
ADA be like: Let's change everything for .00001% of the population, makews total sense!
Braille on drive through ATMs
It’s amazing how they know exactly where to put their hand to read it too. Those blind people are something special
I mean, it worked for the trans-movement...
So they can't ask for help and the whole country need machines that mark ballots for them?
The only thing the democrats know how to do is exploit the weak for their agenda$$$$$$$
Time and time again
Because if you never see it between telling it what to mark and the ballot leaving your possession, the machines can mark down whatever they damn well please.
That’s how all the in person ballots work in GA. You go in, fill it out in touch screen, then it prints on the printer and you feed the primer into a scanner. I voted in person in GA save that’s exactly what everyone did.
Just to be clear: This machine can take a blank ballot and then fill it out when you run it through. It's not just talking about people making their selections on screen and then printing out their ballot. Are you saying that in Georgia, the standard procedure was you make your selections on screen, then, you put your blank, unfilled ballot into the scanner, and it fills in the bubbles for you when it goes through? If so, that's news to me. That's what this feature is talking about.
At any rate, the Wisconsin polls had long since closed on November 4th by the time their machines "ran out of ink", although there are other reasons for why that could be.
It prints it basically like we would print at home. So I guess that is different.
Ok yeah, that's what I thought.
>those using the BMD feature will insert a blank ballot into the scanning slot; after they indicate their choices using the touchscreen or audio/button interface, the ImageCast Evolution will fill in the bubbles on their ballot for them.
LOLWUT? The point of using touch-screen crap and/or filling in a little bubble to cast a vote is to facilitate voting by illiterate people and/or non-English speakers. This seems to take lazy/inept to a new level (by not trusting the DNC's base of low-information/low-IQ muppets to "properly" fill out a bubble on a ballot.)
I heard that their 2024 machines are due to also have a White out feature so that they can white out R votes and fill out D votes.
Maybe to mark that the ballot was counted or something... But probably for fraud.
No, the machine can actually fill out the ballot.
https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2018/10/16/design-flaw-in-dominion-imagecast-evolution-voting-machine/
The printer writes tick marks counting, duh.
Not sure if sarcasm, but the machine can actually fill out the ballot:
https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2018/10/16/design-flaw-in-dominion-imagecast-evolution-voting-machine/
I was thinking like prison hashes 卌
You'd think, but no. The machine can actually fill out blank ballots like a person.
And can serialize the ballots for a Risk Limiting Audit.
Machines made to count votes should NOT have a printer.
A machine made to count votes also shouldn't literally have a manual detailing a dozen ways to manipulate votes either but here we are.
DUH.
Feature that the demoncrats could not resist.
They should have a very special yellow or UV ink that 'cancels' a ballot upon counting - showing it has been counted and can not be recounted without recognizing the extra ink pattern. This would stop the ballot stuffing that happened in Detroit where possibly thousands of the same ballots were counted 8-10 times...
don't a lot of states print ballots on the spot for people voting in person? Any delays due to ink after nov 3 wouldn't make any sense though
The ballots are supposed to be accounted for. The company contracted to prints them in batches that are tracked to where they're needed.
It's to make it harder to get ahold of stacks of ballots and stuff them.
If a poll runs out then you have to vote provisionally or wait for more to be delivered.
It's basically the same reason golf pencils don't have erasers.
Holy fuck I forgot about that! Thanks!
Nothing can stop what is coming
'midterms are secure'
KEKEK
They were.
By holding the Senate, Trump couldn't be removed from office.
So they cheated 2016 and 2020, but 2018 was totally cool?
Yeah, sure, let the enemy know you've cracked their code BEFORE the big moment.
Let me know how that works out.
America First is INEVITABLE
And our tax dollars are paying for this bullshit.
Or Mark Zuc, George Soros and others.
I remember reading the "ran out of ink" story on election night, and asking myself WTF.
Yep. Same with the "water main break" in Fulton county in Georgia, which turned out to be a leaky toilet.
https://web.archive.org/web/20201118214856if_/https://www.foxnews.com/politics/georgia-investigating-vote-counting-delayed-by-flooding-in-democratic-county-gop-poll-watchers-told-counting
Which may or may not have actually been leaky. No one has produced an invoice for the repair, as far as I'm aware.
I read reports that there was a water main break, however, it was fully repaired by 4PM, 6 hours prior to the counting shutdown.
mods should sticky this...
You'd think they wouldn't be dumb enough to have machines fill in the ballots. That's too easy to catch, right? Jesus I would laugh my ass off if this is true
Yeah, I'm not sure. Clearly they brought in an asston of Biden-only, unfolded, perfectly filled in ballots. Whether they had a warehouse full of Dominion voting machines marking a bunch of blank ballots, or whether they just printed them, or stamped them, etc., who knows. But clearly something was up. A voting machine should NEVER have a "mark" feature though for FS!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLIS68YfMYU&t=18m4s How many disabled people need to vote for one of these to run out of ink?
Good catch. I imagine forensics could detect the difference, but even still good luck
Would be a detectable difference between the pressure of someone using a pen and a printer, I would think
Very well put. This is exactly what I was thinking when I read the affidavits about new ballots with no creases at the recount.
Thanks for making this post.
Beeen lurking here awhile, first post here. Anyway...
Only thing I can think of why you would need a ballot marking ability (other than obvious fraud) would be if you got a mail in vote that was damaged. Buuuut pretty sure that's what provisional ballots are for though.
The ink used by a printer or "ImageCast tabulator" is completely different from a ball point pen. There are hundreds of handwriting and ink experts who could identify the type of ink used.
Yes, proper forensic analysis of the ballots in question would answer the questions.
Good intel
The absolute state of the honk right now...
Nice post!
FUCK VOTING MACHINES
paper ballots ONLY, publicly counted
I've been looking for this since the election! Thanks!
MODS STICKY PLEASE!!!
Lexmark has entered the chat.
From the brochure-
Universal Voting Technology
• Optional integrated ADA compliant configurations,providing all voters with privacy and independence.
• Everyone uses the same ballot on the same machine, eliminating the use of multiple machines when voting.
.• A library of human-hand marks and writing is used to mark ballots, further protecting voter privacy.
So it has a library of human-hand marks and writing to mark the ballots, further ensuring voter fraud is harder to detect.
What are the known reasons a vote-counting machine needs ink? (i.e. what will the democrats say in defense)
The single worst possible fraud here is that the scanning machine that counts your vote on election day.. actually alters the physical vote on your ballot...
So if you filled in the oval for Trump and then put your ballot into the scanner - the scanner simply 'prints a new blank oval over your Trump vote - and then instantly marks the Biden oval as a vote for Biden...
you would never know - because you never see your real ballot again.. and the people who would do a recount would not care to look close enough at the ovals to see any 'hanky panky'
Machines like this used at the Mail in processing locations would have Universal Power to alter elections at will.
If if if we had more ink! Okey doke!
This didn't make sense when it happened but it's making a lot more sense now.
When you need to manufacture so many ballots to win cuz Trumps kicking the shit out of you your machines literally run out of ink. Get rekt'd commies
If it was a laser printer (which is likely) it should be trivial to prove.
>"optical scan tabulator featuring a fully integrated ballot-marking device."
And why would the DNC want/need for a counting device to have ballot-marking capabilities? (I get it, they want to falsify ballots. But apart from some sort of printing a seal/receipt to show the ballot had been "counted," is there any legitimate excuse for this "feature?")
Oh wow! Spread the news!
America Voted for Trump. Dominion Voted for Biden.
You a racist if you oppose ink
Nothing sus here.
"innocent" explanation, that may not even be all that innocent. In California, the machine printed out my ballot that I could check to make sure they were correct, and then I scanned the printed ballot into the machine.
That must be a lot of black dots to run out of ink
We need DISCOVERY
Honorable justice that got into their profession for the right reasons, please allow us to shine light on what happened. The country needs to know!
Damn..... <3 MAGA2020
Honestly, I like taking my time and tediously trying to get the perfect fill in the dots but, you can tell it’s human because I cant always get it fully within the line. And, when I don’t like the incumbent Democrat I write in celebrity deadnames if there’s no other option.