It's very fishy that the time intervals are different. Of course there will be a big spike at 4 am compared to 23 if 4am is 1/10th the size. From the graph it's also unclear how much votes trump got at 4am
There was more counting during the night into the early morning, thus more data dumps earlier in the night. Thats why the sections get smaller, less data dumps. It should make it more suspicious that a large number of ballots were dumped during a slow period in counting, not less suspicious. So its not disingenuous, you just arent reading the data properly it would seem.
No... you can dump 100k votes at once or dump them in batches of 5k. At the end of the hour you still dumped thevsame number. But because the intervals are uneven it makes the dump at 4am look huge for 1 hour compared to the rest which were broken down.
I am not discussing the results, just the bad way graph 1 is made.
It's very fishy that the time intervals are different. Of course there will be a big spike at 4 am compared to 23 if 4am is 1/10th the size. From the graph it's also unclear how much votes trump got at 4am
tldr: retarded graphic, disingenuous at best
There was more counting during the night into the early morning, thus more data dumps earlier in the night. Thats why the sections get smaller, less data dumps. It should make it more suspicious that a large number of ballots were dumped during a slow period in counting, not less suspicious. So its not disingenuous, you just arent reading the data properly it would seem.
No... you can dump 100k votes at once or dump them in batches of 5k. At the end of the hour you still dumped thevsame number. But because the intervals are uneven it makes the dump at 4am look huge for 1 hour compared to the rest which were broken down.
I am not discussing the results, just the bad way graph 1 is made.