There was more counting during the night into the early morning, thus more data dumps earlier in the night. Thats why the sections get smaller, less data dumps. It should make it more suspicious that a large number of ballots were dumped during a slow period in counting, not less suspicious. So its not disingenuous, you just arent reading the data properly it would seem.
No... you can dump 100k votes at once or dump them in batches of 5k. At the end of the hour you still dumped thevsame number. But because the intervals are uneven it makes the dump at 4am look huge for 1 hour compared to the rest which were broken down.
I am not discussing the results, just the bad way graph 1 is made.
There was more counting during the night into the early morning, thus more data dumps earlier in the night. Thats why the sections get smaller, less data dumps. It should make it more suspicious that a large number of ballots were dumped during a slow period in counting, not less suspicious. So its not disingenuous, you just arent reading the data properly it would seem.
No... you can dump 100k votes at once or dump them in batches of 5k. At the end of the hour you still dumped thevsame number. But because the intervals are uneven it makes the dump at 4am look huge for 1 hour compared to the rest which were broken down.
I am not discussing the results, just the bad way graph 1 is made.