34
Comments (17)
sorted by:
13
The_Unknown_Patriot 13 points ago +13 / -0

We wouldn't have the type of Civil war they are expecting and pushing us towards. The next Civil War wouldn't be citizen vs citizens like they want. It would just be a small number of people working independently and taking out high value targets individually. Politicians, high ranking big tech and media heads etc.

I keep feeling like they've been trying to get half the population pissed off at the other half like they're trying to push us to fight each other. I don't think they've thought it through very clearly.

7
V2020 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly. Patriot groups would strike high-value targets and cut supply chains to cities. The patriot groups would then blend into the population and use their liberal neighbors as meat-shields to prevent carpet bombing an area.

6
StaryHickory 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is how it typically happens anyways. A lot of dead politicians and big wigs. French revolution transpired mostly this way. Many of the revolutions in England were the same way. No one seeks to engage the army they want to get those responsible.

Not advocating it, but lets be honest this is how it will go if it does happen.

2
TrumpsBigBalls 2 points ago +2 / -0

I keep feeling like they've been trying to get half the population pissed off at the other half like they're trying to push us to fight each other.

You nailed it....see 'Color Revolution'

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
MrRequiem 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thank you for sharing this video. I believe it may become important if the legal system fails us. I've been pushing it since I found it. The more folks pushing, the better idea we all have if all alternatives fail.

The line being crossed is the supreme court failing to properly examine the mountains of evidence we all have gathered shrugging their shoulders and saying "Eh. No big deal." After that. The fourth box is opened.

5
800080 5 points ago +5 / -0

Since the Democrats know that mass gun grabbing is a real bad idea. They aren't completely stupid and value self-preservation.

They will do it in other ways and avoid starting a civil war that way.

First sign: banning the sales of new guns they want to seize, but you can keep your doctor. Maybe more guns under the NFA tax. Then sales only through FFL holders only no private parties. Cut down on the number of FFL holders. Then maybe registration or ordering the ATF to collect 4470's to 'review' Finally they will ban guns a model at a time and collect them a few at a time.

drip. drip. drip. drip..

If you notice, some of this has already started.

6
V2020 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

The only thing this restriction will accomplish is to prevent the left from owning guns, which benefits our side. We have somewhere around 4 guns per republican. Only about 15% of liberals own a firearm.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
V2020 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any armed conflict will definitely start with targeted kills. It’s not a pretty picture but I can’t see a situation where this does not take place.

3
LLegendary 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's not a "civil war" . It's us vs deep state.

3
uniformist 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know many gun owners who will start shouting if gun confiscation begins.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
V2020 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0
  1. It does not assume an honest press.

  2. It doesn’t matter how ruthless communists are…They are incapable.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
V2020 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why it has to be rooted out early. McCarthy was absolutely right.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5