3479
Comments (54)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
32
blogbusserb [S] 32 points ago +32 / -0

Summary thread and link to documentation https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1329203644332437504.html

15
sad_clown 15 points ago +15 / -0

wow, that thread sure is on point.. now can we force all media to show it and respond to it. Would having americaVoice covering this encourage other media to look at it?

4
CMUBigGuy 4 points ago +4 / -0

I redid the math even assuming perfection on the output (3,600 per hour). It still only totals 170,760 votes. That's still 100,000 short of what is reported. If this holds up, even under perfect conditions, this is a really big deal.

3
HocusLocus 3 points ago +3 / -0

In the doc sad to see weak tinfoil #11 where he alleges that fractional decimals in Edison data candidate vote totals result from some weighted average scheme and not stupid lack of precision. I mean the real reason for the fractions is right there in front of him. I know he cracked a TX case with Fraction Magic but the Edison data does not prove it.

#12 and #13 as shown above re: votes into the system exceeding any possible rate of physical processing, that one is a damned strong argument that any honest judge should consider since there is nothing esoteric about it.