40
Comments (18)
sorted by:
4
freedom2520 4 points ago +4 / -0

The lockdowns have robbed us of herd immunity, still (although we're getting close to it "for real" now, the vaccine, depending on its rollout, may interfere with that), killing many more as a result. All part of the plan

3
Jimmy_Russler 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't believe these numbers at all. 1/4 of the "covid deaths" in America was admitted to be from heart attacks alone.

3
WalterJDuke [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Been the same everywhere, and I'm saying this as someone who lost close family friends as a result of covid. However, they were 70+ and a stronger pneumonia is likely to kill a person at that age if not treated immediately. This is bogus shit in terms of real societal impact. I've been working multiple shifts through the spikes in areas where there's plenty of people and haven't gotten sick once. Some colleagues did, but their immune systems are shit because of their lifestyles. Just load up with 2000mg vitamin C, 10.000 IU vit D every other day, selenium and zinc and you're gonna be just fine. If you do get covid, just get IV vit C in high doses a few days. Plenty of my younger friends and colleagues had symptoms for a mere day or two.

2
PRINCEBARRON 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree regarding vitamin supplements. Other key seems to be early treatment at any stage for anyone that gets the virus. This Baylor Medical Vice Chair of Internal Med is like many others that recommends HCQ plus treatments as the normal protocol for those at risk. The CCP-WHO go home and get over it protocol should never have been advised to for those at risk. Baylor doc even recommends a fresh air and zinc sulfate protocol for healthy individuals with minor symptoms.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxmhvZ6eEI4

1
WalterJDuke [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. It's relatively easily treatable if you go hard at it right off the bat, especially for younger people.

2
Jimmy_Russler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Strange how none of these media alarmists advise people to take vitamins and live a healthy life style. Their only advise is shut up, stay home, be scared, and wait for the vaccine.

3
WalterJDuke [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excellent stuff to read - the flu pandemics which came from mutated strains originating in Asia in 1957 and 1968 had much higher % death rates, especially when compared to the global population at the time. Also, a lot of younger people died back then, which is not the case today. No media hysteria, no fearmongering, no lockdowns. Took the population between 1 and 3 years to fully self-immunize against the viruses, as the first two waves attacked the unprepared immune systems by storm, but then faded out.

4
PRINCEBARRON 4 points ago +4 / -0

2020 we do masks and lockdowns... 1969 they did Woodstock! What the hell have we become?!

1
K-Harbour 1 point ago +1 / -0

And, went to the moon.

0
robbie5325 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are you against mask usage?

3
M4J0R_CH335E 3 points ago +3 / -0

yes

3
PRINCEBARRON 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nope, you can wear one if you choose to.

2
PRINCEBARRON 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here is a visualization. It would be better if they correlated the graphic to world population at the time of each: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/history-of-pandemics-deadliest/

3
freedom2520 3 points ago +3 / -0

Indeed, should be represented as a normalized percentage of world population at the time

2
WalterJDuke [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Excellent find, pede.

2
K-Harbour 2 points ago +2 / -0

They should population adjust....we did not have 7 billion people 2000 years ago

1
Madhax47 1 point ago +1 / -0

They planned this since ww2