posted ago by chez_blunts
+6 / -0
As an example, how would you describe people who claim to be anti SJW, but are basically SJWs without the SJW political beliefs?
As an example, how would you describe people who claim to be anti SJW, but are basically SJWs without the SJW political beliefs?
Dude you gotta give an example of what you mean. Point our a scenario please.
The kotakuinaction2 community.
Not necessarily. You would also need to be an American.
i assume these are women your asking about
No
based on your question im not sure what you mean by intolerant but not sjw political beliefs. in general you could call it fascist i suppose. I mean, is this so you can describe it to others or to point out inconsistencies to him? when you meet an anti-facist ask them what fascism is and how it manafests. then point out it is exactly how they are acting
Yeah this is some “female logic”. I would ignore them. Or you can just use the Trump card and call then a racist? That seems to be their go to.
the word you're looking for is bigot
Ideologue
A racist ?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev373c7wSRg (Ryan long)
Someone who is anti-sjw is tolerant. I don't think that what you're fishing for exists. Feel free to follow up.
Far right evangelical Christians are anti SJW. No one would say they're tolerant.
SJWs are bad because of their behavior and personality. There are plenty of people with similar political beliefs that aren't insufferable people like SJWs are, and there are people with opposing political beliefs who are just as insufferable as SJWs (far right evangelical Christian fundamentalists for example or the (non-American members of KotakuinAction2).
Okay this is why I asked you to just come out and say whatever it was that you came here to say. Let me break down the differences between what you're envisioning and reality.
First of all, from a definitional point of view, "far right" and "evangelical Christians" don't necessarily go hand-in-hand. I would say that "evangelical Christians" tend more towards the conservative side of the aisle but not always. I live in Boulder Colorado and "evangelical Christians" here are a mix of centrist, Leftist, and liberal. So of those I would obviously put the Leftists on the far-left, the centrists and liberals on the right.
Now, I don't know if by "evangelical Christians" you are also including people of the Jewish faith, Catholics, Protestants, or what. You do later mention "Christian Fundamentalists" which maybe (?) would include me. I'm Yahudim, so my belief system aligns more with the Jewish believers except in acceptance of Yashua as the son of the Father. I would consider myself to be somewhat liberal socially, and very conservative fiscally. I would consider myself to be extremely tolerant, almost all my friends are either Leftists or liberals. The Leftists no longer talk to me, the liberals have joined me on the right.
Alrighty. So none of that addresses your basic point you wanted to make: Christians are just as intolerant as Social Justice Warriors. Despite the grouping of all people of faith into one category, let me just say "horseshit" to that.
You posit that SJWs are bad specifically because of their "behavior and personality." Ironically this does accidentally point out that the SJW religion does inherently require intensive conformity. True! I agree with you. It is a pathway through cult training. This is why there is such a heavy-handed focus on separating young new adherents of the religion of SJW from their families.
I would posit to you that the reason SJWs are bad isn't specifically because they're often robotic douchebags. It's because they are on the "left hand path." They mean to cause actual physical harm to come to other humans.
Christians, Jews, Catholics (people of the Judeo-Christian tradition) are called upon to be of service to others. We want to help others' souls to grow. The goal of a Judeo-Christian ideology is to heal ourselves, then those closest to us, with the energy radiating outward. Here are the big differences: we put on our own oxygen mask first, so that we can later help others. The GOAL is to help others. To be of service to OTHERS. It is not about ourselves. This is fundamental to the ideologies, despite whatever differences they have.
For SJWs, the goal is rooted in "self." The "self" is the center and the most important thing. SJWs claim to want to help others, however their core is RESENTMENT. While "evangelical Christians" are on a mission to let go of resentment, SJWs are on a mission to increase resentment.
There are some other very important differences here to consider. Further discussion can include comparisons of "politics versus faith" since SJWs use politics AS religion, while people of faith are called to be in acceptance of the world as a fallen place. We can also look at "liberty versus slavery" since the Judeo-Christian faiths finally removed the stain of slavery from the human race as a unique concept which they created based on their own faith's values, and the SJW crew is in a race to restore slavery. We could also look at the concepts of "acceptance versus intolerance of reality," the occult and magic, then "live and let live."
Not sure why you would think that "evangelical Christians" are intolerant. There are natural rules to reality and living by those rules leads to the flowering of life. They might not want to put up with any horseshit from other people. They have all of human history and the miracles in their own lives telling them that they are on the right path, the right-hand path. They are happy and often at peace. Their way WORKS. Why would they want to waste any time listening to fools regurgitate the eras-old garbage that comes up over and over? SJW shit isn't new, it's as old as the first humans. It's Cain and Abel.
If you're looking for a closer analogy in history, I would point you at the historical precursors of SJWs: other Leftist ideologies such as the KKK, Nazis, Communists. These are people who are violently intolerant, who mean harm to their fellow humans. Every generation it rises again and we have to stamp it back out again, over and over.