I don't think that it is blackmail. It is, however, clear COERCION, which is absolute a crime
18 U.S. Code § 610.Coercion of political activity
It shall be unlawful for any person to intimidate, threaten, command, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, command, or coerce, any employee of the Federal Government as defined in section 7322(1) of title 5, United States Code, to engage in, or not to engage in, any political activity, including, but not limited to, voting or refusing to vote for any candidate or measure in any election, making or refusing to make any political contribution, or working or refusing to work on behalf of any candidate. Any person who violates this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
[Emphasis Added on "attempt" because even the attempt is a crime].
I mention this because this word will be used to call this claim "False" by the social media tyrants
I heard some msm bitch say that the Secretary of State said they cant rescind their votes. Rudy didn't really say that was true or not he just said "of course shes gonna say that"
A little more detail
"EPIC CORRECTION OF THE DECADE"
The correction:
"Thus, where we indicated that higher scores in Table 1 (page 40) reflect a more conservative response, they actually reflect a more liberal response. Specifically, in the original manuscript, the descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck’s psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative."
If you go back to the excerpts above and swap out the ideological categories you will have to suppress a horselaugh. Liberals are more prone to “psychoticism” (which the authors hasten to explain doesn’t meant “psychotic,” but what the hell. . .), and hence authoritarianism, which would come as no surprise to any conservative who pays attention to authoritarian liberalism. And people higher in Social Desirability will turn out to be conservatives, which is also congruent with the many simpler survey findings that conservatives are happier than liberals.
You’d haven’t more success calling the Proud Boys instead of the FBI.
Proud Boys and 4chan have to replace the jobs police and FBI should be doing. Sad!
FBI is still busy with the whole Biden Bus thing.
Nah, they have a NATIONAL SECURITY OPEN CASE that are still checking out some noose the size of a quarter at some car race.
There was probably some racist grafiti that popped up on an abandoned shed somewhere that needs their urgent attention.
Calls made to the FBI..... Oh I feel SOOOOOO much better.
She'd be more likely to get meaningful action if she addressed her complaint to Gilligan, put it in a bottle, and threw it in the Detroit River.
She needs to rely on patriotic neighbors.
I don't think that it is blackmail. It is, however, clear COERCION, which is absolute a crime
[Emphasis Added on "attempt" because even the attempt is a crime].
I mention this because this word will be used to call this claim "False" by the social media tyrants
Not sure about the arrow pointing towards the left...
The fbi LOL
That's like calling CNN with a hot news scoop...
Put the screws to those bastards!
I heard some msm bitch say that the Secretary of State said they cant rescind their votes. Rudy didn't really say that was true or not he just said "of course shes gonna say that"
Anyone able to opine?
"Study from 2012 now corrected to show liberals, not conservatives, more authoritarian" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/11/liberals-not-conservatives-more-likely-possess-psy/ (Leftists are also much quicker to become physically violent (or verbally ad hominem), imho.)
A little more detail "EPIC CORRECTION OF THE DECADE" The correction:
"Thus, where we indicated that higher scores in Table 1 (page 40) reflect a more conservative response, they actually reflect a more liberal response. Specifically, in the original manuscript, the descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck’s psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative."
If you go back to the excerpts above and swap out the ideological categories you will have to suppress a horselaugh. Liberals are more prone to “psychoticism” (which the authors hasten to explain doesn’t meant “psychotic,” but what the hell. . .), and hence authoritarianism, which would come as no surprise to any conservative who pays attention to authoritarian liberalism. And people higher in Social Desirability will turn out to be conservatives, which is also congruent with the many simpler survey findings that conservatives are happier than liberals.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/06/epic-correction-of-the-decade.php
This correction really made the rounds!
"Liberals, Not Conservatives, Express More Psychoticism" http://reason.com/blog/2016/06/10/liberals-not-conservatives-express-more
saved
the FBI will do nothing except harass the republican official
Actual source?
Standby. Is this saying that they caved a 2nd time and the county is now certified? Or is this the initial reporting?
FBI: Leads? Yeah sure I'll just check with the boys at the crime lab. They got four more agents working the case. They got us working in shifts!😂🤣😆