Right, Crowder comparing 15% to 80% was entirely wrong. were those 15% were in person only, in the 85% were in person plus absentee when they were counted to the correct precinct.
So it’s a good question, why were only some pre-sinks counting their own absent tea, and others were counted in some nebulous zero registered voters black hole?
They did the same in 2016, and it’s done to save resources.
Precinct 109 has 1 registered voter. Do you want to have at least 3 paid election workers waiting for this one vote that may or may not turn up in the mail?
There’s a possible solution though, making it more transparent. If you decide witch AVCB gets which precincts, like precinct 1-8 gets AVCB 1, you can with ease calculate the amount of registered voters and voter turnout for that AVCB.
Right, Crowder comparing 15% to 80% was entirely wrong. were those 15% were in person only, in the 85% were in person plus absentee when they were counted to the correct precinct.
So it’s a good question, why were only some pre-sinks counting their own absent tea, and others were counted in some nebulous zero registered voters black hole?
They did the same in 2016, and it’s done to save resources. Precinct 109 has 1 registered voter. Do you want to have at least 3 paid election workers waiting for this one vote that may or may not turn up in the mail? There’s a possible solution though, making it more transparent. If you decide witch AVCB gets which precincts, like precinct 1-8 gets AVCB 1, you can with ease calculate the amount of registered voters and voter turnout for that AVCB.