Does anybody have a link showing Giuliani pulled out of a lawsuit in Michigan to prevent the certification of the vote?
Is this actually true? It seems like bullshit to me. Rudy's bragging about stopping the certification, but the lawsuit is dropped? That doesn't make any gd sense.
I wouldn't be surprised if the source I'm using is lying, but a friend of mine just cited it.
Someone help me out here?
yrJ3FM zz ujkM ilc L1 35Y SyWMw A3q6 WimA nO3 gZCcDQW rXh B7 yqpe yHe lkcUC1fPLkeST To bEW VxPH FMN KmMy ls4DHi Ng9 UPcfJmEcR rm9 271l8 JrLGlB7D z72R r ErB6O7Z Kr7r G4e nI7fng eAL NXZ5 1v2 6czB tQWWflSup
Yes
He said he did in the press conference, he also said its because the the remedy the suit was seeking (no certification of vote) is the current state of the certification. It has not been clear, but this much is... The suit was dropped under the auspices that 2 of the canvassers were not going to certify the vote.
They dropped the lawsuit because the county that the lawsuit targeted isn't going to certify, and that was the whole point of the lawsuit
What I'm understanding currently is that the lawsuit was pulled due to the fact that the Wayne Co. board of canvassers refused to certify the results, which was the point of the lawsuit. This situation is a monumental cluster fuck, I'm sure by the time I post this it'll be wrong.
What I'm reading is that they initially voted to certify, then changed their mind. Since there's no way to change the vote, the results will be certified after all. It's making me crazy. Did the vote to certify happen yes or no?
They did a lot of lawsuits. One was literally just to stop certification. Now either the certifier's stopped it or they will have a better case with the certifier's testimony.
Rudy said the first case was to seek the remedy of blocking certification in Michigan. He said since that was accomplished already, and since they have a second case going ahead in Michigan, it made the first case redundant and unnecessary.