672
Comments (63)
sorted by:
62
deleted 62 points ago +64 / -2
31
googurt 31 points ago +31 / -0

Exactly. They even said this during the press conference. They can't dump everything they have to the press before it goes before a judge.

17
CisSiberianOrchestra 17 points ago +17 / -0

You don't show your evidence before the trial. Everyone who knows even a little about legal proceedings knows this. Showing your hand too early lets the media smear you in advance, intimidate your witnesses, and build narratives that you're lying.

8
chieflemons [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Exactly right. What they're doing is absolutely fucking perfect. The 'tick tock' that everyone is fed up with is actually in the background scaring the shit out of the Dems and Biden's legal team because the more they reveal in small drops, the more it shows that they've caught them and doesn't give Biden's team a chance to prepare for what's coming.

Explains why Lin Wood is daring people to sue him.

7
CisSiberianOrchestra 7 points ago +7 / -0

The 'tick tock' that everyone is fed up with doomers are too stupid and impatient to understand

Fixed it for you.

3
chieflemons [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you pede!

1
MakeAmericaLegendary 1 point ago +1 / -0

To us, it's an annoying repetitive sound that's always there in the background. For them, it's seconds ticking away before their coming demise.

The tick-tock is making them sweat.

2
Alpha_plus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup. He's a snake.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Sum_devil 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s being the cia and thems public opinion attorney.

2
trumplandslide 2 points ago +2 / -0

Strike 1: Tucker admitting he's friends with drug addict, criminal and pervert Hunter Biden

Strike 2: Tucker calls election for Biden

Strike 3: Tucker attacks Sidney Powell.

Do we need 50 strikes before you see the enemy staring you in the face? I sure hope not

30
BestTimeToBAlive 30 points ago +30 / -0

I will never even give him a try again.

Why on earth would she give him data that she hasn’t even shown the courts yet? Lol he’s so done

19
chieflemons [S] 19 points ago +19 / -0

Exactly, who the fuck is he? The Supreme Court?

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
BestTimeToBAlive 7 points ago +7 / -0

He’s literally a talking head.

He also had a Daily Caller guy at the presser who asked guiliani an antagonistic question. He’s prob pissed Rudy treated him like the ride bitch he was. Tucker is the same. A rude little bitch.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
19
jubyeonin 19 points ago +20 / -1

He is now Cucker Tardson.

19
Cali_kid 19 points ago +20 / -1

Cucker is a fake saw him about a week ago tried to throw bread crumbs at us. He's an actor he will side with the lefties if fox paid him to. Regardless fox is going to focus on the normies and moderate liberals

6
BestTimeToBAlive 6 points ago +6 / -0

saw him about a week ago tried to throw bread crumbs at us.

Lol, “I found the voter fraud guys! It was 30 dead voters”

Next day: “Oops, my bad. 29 actually. One was alive”

He’s literally a globalist shill that loves Colin Powell’s WMD “evidence” 🙄 and the 1000 year war that ensued afterwards. Now he can join the ranks of Bushes, McCains & Liberals everywhere.

2
QuantumReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

The number of both of those is dwindling. Either you're waking up and shifting MAGA, or you believe Trumps trying to overturn legitimate election results and you're sliding commie.

14
MidDayMAGA 14 points ago +15 / -1

I’m an idiot, and even I know that she can’t just show all the cards. Gotta save that stuff for court. Tuck has cucked

2
Alpha_plus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tucker knows that. He's being intentionally deceitful, especially since they explain their case in a press conference today.

11
greenbeancallahan1 11 points ago +11 / -0

She has to prove it in court, not to Tucker Carlson. Why would she ever put her evidence on TV? Judge Judy is not deciding this.
Tucker was being misleading at the behest of his masters. Sorry to see Tucker cave.

4
chieflemons [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly right.

9
MrsNesbitt 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh, you're going somewhere, Carlson.

The unemployment line.

8
Mkkapusc 8 points ago +9 / -1

Very disappointing. I understand proof is important but what does he expect she do.

4
Strike_Eagle784 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've been thinking it for a while, but people honestly believed they could trust a TV guy to give them the straight news, just because he happens to agree with us sometimes? The best (and arguably only) place to get any sort of commentary is on the internet now.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
South_Florida_Guy 3 points ago +4 / -1

For millions and millions of bucks, you CAN cuck the Tuck! (can't really blame him tbh, you think he cares about us vs. his own family's financial well being?)

3
OrangeElvis 3 points ago +3 / -0

F Faux. F Tucker. Official.

3
NYRepublican72 3 points ago +4 / -1

Turned off Cucker once he told me his next segment was about the losers that Biden wants in his fairytale cabinet.

Fuck cucker. No legitimacy should be given to Joe Biden.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
gnostic357 3 points ago +5 / -2

I'm going to assume this is mis-characterizing what he said before passing judgment on him.

No one expects police to bring blood drops from a crime to a press conference. Rudy and Sidney do not need to bring their evidence either. It's enough that they're describing it. Tucker is (or has been at least) too smart to echo the leftist's wail of, "Where's the evidence?"

Tucker told us that dead people voted. He's talked about other aspects of the fraud. And now idiots on Twitter are calling him another "Trump hater". It's sad to see rampant stupidity on our side.

2
Roninvalhalla 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mother Tucker, I am sure they don't want to give Fox ratings because they stabbed us all in the back. Remember, its not about the media. They lost their right for information when they tried to steal this thing.

2
Bragg 2 points ago +2 / -0

LIke Sidney would send Tucker the evidence and show her hand. WTF is tucker thinking?

2
JSullz59 2 points ago +2 / -0

Get Lou Dobbs on!!!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
SimPilot 1 point ago +1 / -0

This wasn't "show me sauce" - it was trying to discredit her. I always want to get sauce and from a reliable person. Or we end up with blue-fucking-falcon wizards claiming some crazy ass shit.

1
NormanConquest 1 point ago +1 / -0

So Tucker, what about that evidence on Hunter that you withheld?

1
trumplandslide 1 point ago +1 / -0

CUCKER Carlson

1
VikingPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Why won't they show us their evidence before the trial!"

Maybe they don't want their opponents to know what they got? Cucker Carlson is dead to me after this, Acting like an CNN bitch.

1
sorrytodisagree 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair I see a lot of knee-jerk attacks here too when the tick-tocks don't go boom immediately.

1
MakeLiberalsCryAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

She doesn't need to show it to the press. It gets shown to the courts. It will be shown to the courts, and shit's gonna get real for the cheating dems.

1
RealHunterBidenAMA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually really want to see what Sidney is talking about

1
xelalieNeilAlex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ooof, the final nail on the FOX's coffin

1
chingchong_bigdong 1 point ago +1 / -0

She technically has though...

Just look at who and what she retweets.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Bluestorm83 1 point ago +1 / -0

What a shame. The Tuck has gone Cuck.

1
EndPoliticalCareers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not watching FNC, or Newsmax, or OANN, will do all of us good. Being the product never ends well for the product. All of them want to stir up controversy, and all will always choose ratings/controversy/tittilation over truth.

Tucker Carlson adapts to what makes him coin. He bounced around from place to place “adapting” til he found a schitck at FNC recently, but he’s a swamp creature through and through.

Just shut that shit off and take the dog for a walk. And read TheDonald.Win. Easy.

As to Sydney Powell... I’d like to know more because, frankly, what she says sounds possible but not plausible and I’m not sure how any of it lines up in a court hearing. I hope she has the goods, and she always has before, so fingers crossed.

1
Phil_DeGraves 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop watching CCP/DCP-narrative-controlled news outlets.

1
Avenatti2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tuck went cuck. They explained during the press conference why they could not show the evidence to the press and that they were presenting it to the courts. Even my goofy dog understood what was a clear and rationale explanation.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +5 / -5
6
chieflemons [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why would you want her to prove it outside of the court case? I don't give a fuck about what's on television. If it's proven in court, that's all that fucking matters.

1
bubble_bursts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because only an idiot shows all the proof to media before its presented in the courts.

0
chaletschuss3467 0 points ago +1 / -1

FUCK FOX. FUCK TUCKER. GET OFF OF FUCKING FOX

-1
MoonshineDelight -1 points ago +5 / -6

Mark Levin doesn't believe Sidney Powell either.

10
MangoRage 10 points ago +10 / -0

I don't see why he wouldn't. Him of all people should know what she's about.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +3 / -6
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0