Tucker isn't "turning deep state". He was upset that Sidney wouldn't come on the show to provide evidence (which she is clearly trying to save for the courts to prevent the media from spreading a false narrative about the fraud she has found).
EDIT: Sidney has recently stated that she DID give Tucker some evidence (a new affidavit and offered a witness who can explain the statistical side of things better than she can, but he wanted her). This doesn't mean he's "deep state", this means he is upset that he missed out on an exclusive interview to bring up his ratings.... which is his JOB.
Thank you. Tucker has brought a LOT of truth to light. I think he was off-base expecting evidence for a courtroom to be produced on his show, but let me say this:
One of the real problems the conservative movement has is being so quick to turn on people who don't agree with us 100% or represent us 100%. That is self-sabotage.
It's unlikely you're going to agree with every statement a person makes. Sometimes I think Alex Jones dooms, but he's a patriot. Sometimes I think Ben Shapiro is wrong, but his pro-life debates are powerful (same with Steven Crowder). I like Kanye, but I think it was ignorant for him to vote only for himself and no one else on the ballot.
I wish we weren't so quick to jump on a bandwagon of writing someone off forever because we aren't pleased with a particular thing they say, when they can still have a powerful effect for the cause. We should be wiser than that.
Tucker was talking about fraud and acknowledging it. He said he wanted to get to the bottom of the truth, whatever that may be. I saw the segment and I didn't think it was worthy of the dramatically negative reaction that he's suddenly a deep state, controlled opp traitor. I see quite a few on social media who are judging this and didn't even see the segment.
He's still out here red-pilling normies in a variety of ways. We should use to our advantage what we can. You don't have to watch him, but you don't have to demonize him, either.
It also goes hand-in-hand with our society, that we accept - almost savor - the build-up and tear-down of public figures. And that is not beneficial to our aim of freedom of speech and freedom of thought if we bust out torches and pitchforks the moment someone expresses an unpopular opinion among us.
Everyone calm the fuck down.
Tucker isn't "turning deep state". He was upset that Sidney wouldn't come on the show to provide evidence (which she is clearly trying to save for the courts to prevent the media from spreading a false narrative about the fraud she has found).
EDIT: Sidney has recently stated that she DID give Tucker some evidence (a new affidavit and offered a witness who can explain the statistical side of things better than she can, but he wanted her). This doesn't mean he's "deep state", this means he is upset that he missed out on an exclusive interview to bring up his ratings.... which is his JOB.
Thank you. Tucker has brought a LOT of truth to light. I think he was off-base expecting evidence for a courtroom to be produced on his show, but let me say this:
One of the real problems the conservative movement has is being so quick to turn on people who don't agree with us 100% or represent us 100%. That is self-sabotage.
It's unlikely you're going to agree with every statement a person makes. Sometimes I think Alex Jones dooms, but he's a patriot. Sometimes I think Ben Shapiro is wrong, but his pro-life debates are powerful (same with Steven Crowder). I like Kanye, but I think it was ignorant for him to vote only for himself and no one else on the ballot.
I wish we weren't so quick to jump on a bandwagon of writing someone off forever because we aren't pleased with a particular thing they say, when they can still have a powerful effect for the cause. We should be wiser than that.
Tucker was talking about fraud and acknowledging it. He said he wanted to get to the bottom of the truth, whatever that may be. I saw the segment and I didn't think it was worthy of the dramatically negative reaction that he's suddenly a deep state, controlled opp traitor. I see quite a few on social media who are judging this and didn't even see the segment.
He's still out here red-pilling normies in a variety of ways. We should use to our advantage what we can. You don't have to watch him, but you don't have to demonize him, either.
It also goes hand-in-hand with our society, that we accept - almost savor - the build-up and tear-down of public figures. And that is not beneficial to our aim of freedom of speech and freedom of thought if we bust out torches and pitchforks the moment someone expresses an unpopular opinion among us.
You're absolutely right.