2616
Comments (62)
sorted by:
89
kanabiis 89 points ago +89 / -0

Give us the evidence before your court case....

Does this guy know how the legal system works?

Tucker going to feel this in the morning.

Shame.

20
Dave___Smith 20 points ago +20 / -0

Powell is going after absolute killers right now. Why would she show all her cards now? I’m shocked she’s been saying as much as she has been.

It’s called credibility Tucker. Something she has plenty of.

7
MAGOAT 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hes a bonafide cucksucker

3
Yutrahkill 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ben shapiro saying the same shit too

1
ChuckedBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just wait, he will call us fickle and it will be the most ironic statement he'll ever make.

48
2a4life 48 points ago +48 / -0

Tuck the cuck is really going to forfeit his career. What a waste. Just like Trump said when he first announced he was running for president "Now we find out who our real friends are"

47
nra1ifer 47 points ago +48 / -1

Tucker needs to realize that Sidney won’t legitimize Faux News with her presence.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
38
Nannerbadnanner 38 points ago +38 / -0

Since he tends to lose important evidence in the mail, maybe she didn't trust him.

31
deleted 31 points ago +31 / -0
27
Marina 27 points ago +27 / -0

Why are you still watching Fox. They have basically told you to go away. We don’t like you. Don’t come back. How many times do they have to insult us before everyone gets the Message?

22
Grindelwald 22 points ago +22 / -0

Maybe he should have attended the press conference. Then he could do some research on what she said. She’s not a pet dog, Tucker.

20
victorywin 20 points ago +20 / -0

I see this bullshit in some documentaries, too. The narrator talks badly about a person/organization and then says "we called them, they didn't respond" and he uses this as a proof that what he's been telling us is true and that person/org is bad.

do they have to respond to you?

have anybody else noticed that?

7
TrumpMaskReplica 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes and they usually say "did not immediately respond" which actually means they sent an email "asking for a response" and then uploaded the article at the same time. It's a known thing that whenever you see the news say "so-and-so did not respond", they didn't even give them a chance.

18
Kekistan_United 18 points ago +18 / -0

funny him not wanting to get all the data pedes and autists on his show...

15
FuckinCommies 15 points ago +15 / -0

Wow. Fully bending over for his CCP overlords already?

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
12
Blndhairylegs 12 points ago +12 / -0

Didnt fox shit all over the press conference? Why would she give them ratings?

11
rtravisf 11 points ago +11 / -0

if we had the goods the last place we are going is to give murdochs virtue signaling idiot wife some views and $$$$ fuck that family and fuck all the commies they can eat a D.

10
Nadlers_Belt 10 points ago +11 / -1

Guess what Tuck. She won’t give her evidence to CNN either.

In case you haven’t noticed, FOX Is the new CNN. That’s why your rating are in a free fall.

10
KeKieChan 10 points ago +10 / -0

because the Tuck has become Cucked...sad times indeed

10
ChuckedIntoAVan 10 points ago +11 / -1

Sounds like he’s butthurt that she won’t come on his show. He hasn’t realized yet that they would be doing him a favor, and he’s lost all his power. He could do a five minute search here and find enough charts, graphs, articles, and ELI5 explanations to fill his whole time slot.

9
trumptrain11 9 points ago +10 / -1

Color me shocked.

9
easedel 9 points ago +9 / -0

Considering they explained why they are not "showing evidence"....that shows whoever researched the presser today didn't watch all of it

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
victorywin 8 points ago +9 / -1

the real point here for those who come here to defend Tucker for being a 'real journalist' is: Why did he have to do a segment about it? if she didn't respond, she didn't respond and you have no story to tell.

1
qwertyuiop123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because he spent a lot of time presenting all her accusations to the American public AND going through all the evidence she presented. At the end it is important to explain that some of the accusations have not had any evidence presented yet, otherwise he would be deceiving his audience.

-7
SickPuppy -7 points ago +1 / -8

"Why did he have to do a segment about it?"

Uh because it's kind of if important? He also didn't have a segment on it, but just covered it as something smelly. And it is.

5
TrumpMaskReplica 5 points ago +5 / -0

Powell not going on his show is not smelly...it's reasonable. I think you're smelling your rotten brain sucking down the MSM.

7
sorrytodisagree 7 points ago +7 / -0

I hate it when people whine about tick-tocks not going boom fast enough.

7
foom 7 points ago +7 / -0

He wants the evidence so he can pass it along to his handlers.

7
Billygoat65 7 points ago +8 / -1

Tucker wasn’t paying attention, his opinion means nothing. The evidence comes out in court, this was only an opening statement.

5
Ivleeeg 5 points ago +6 / -1

I never understood the obsession with tucker. He was good at times but he had some very strong establishment leanings.

4
BillBarrsSkelatons 4 points ago +6 / -2

WHAT DID HE SAY ABOUT HUNTER

JUST CURIOUS..

3
Greatest_adventure 3 points ago +3 / -0

C'mon Tucker, you could do better than parrot that bullshit from your comrades. You can tell evidence when you see it, can't you? Remember the Hunter laptop?

3
iamlimelight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cucker Carlson....his true colors are showing.

3
jdog 3 points ago +3 / -0

What he didn't mention is that Powell actually did provide some evidence. Cucker said she provided none

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
TAIWANNUMBERONE 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a common tactic among shills. Cry for "evidence", find out what they have and then destroy what they don't, turning their lead into a dead end.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
HookInMouth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just another compicent stooge. Another nail in Faux's coffin

2
marvin_nash 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's gone guys. It's sucks, but he's gone 😕

2
WopNine17plus1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why the fuck would she EVER do that? Tucker works for Faux News for fucks sake!

2
MyRigga 2 points ago +2 / -0

He had a good comeback considering Jon Stewart made him a laughing stock. I guess he wants to be laughed at again.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Rucktoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

They specifically addressed that today was an opening statement with evidence to be shown.

I understand that we all want to see the evidence yesterday, but we know it is there and it takes time.

1
Kanime1224 1 point ago +1 / -0

The tuck has been cucked. but I never will be

1
FREE1OR1DIE 1 point ago +1 / -0

These media people are un-fucking-believable. They really think they are in charge. No, you're a talking head. You are not a judge in a court room. You're entitled to nothing. It's not worth compromising the results of the election to lesk evidence before a court date because you're throwing a tantrum. GTFO.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Gospeedrcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You guys realize the disaster team fox hired is now making Tucker show his true colors to recover the stations ratings? I have news for u if you've watched fox even only for tucker over the last few years you are still under a trance. Wake up.

1
LikeAWombatScorned 1 point ago +2 / -1

To be fair, he didn't call her a liar. He said she made claims that the software took votes from Trump and gave them to Biden, and hasn't provided evidence of it yet.

1
VoterIDMatters 1 point ago +1 / -0

nice handshake

got a link shill?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
mjw2006 0 points ago +5 / -5

Tucker did not call her a liar he simply asked that she come on the show and detail the specifics on the swapping vote accusations. She refused. Its critical to explain to the entire country if the vote swap happened (it sure looks like it did!). All the other disputes they can save for court - this one needs to be explained in detail to any audience offered - at minimum to ensure it doesnt happen again.

0
Monzie 0 points ago +1 / -1

I literally turned that shit off the second he started in on her. I was totally pissed.

0
MondayCoupleIsDead 0 points ago +1 / -1

Now i see why Trump avoided this fuck.

-1
Sapito -1 points ago +1 / -2

my spidey sense tells me tucker is a scientologist

-3
Hoozbad -3 points ago +2 / -5

Why cant she show evidence? who cares about court of law bullshit this was account on our country and courts are possibly compromised. Trump must take action NOW with our without the law on his side. He can use his powers as commander and chief to declare emergency martial law and arrest people with our national guard and military.

3
TrumpMaskReplica 3 points ago +3 / -0

This comment is beyond idiotic. Trump must continue with this carefully constructed case.

-3
OppaiZuriZuri -3 points ago +2 / -5

Hey! That's really, really low to say that!

Leave his poor brother out of this, it's a serious medical condition. ;3