164
posted ago by ToddHarsh ago by ToddHarsh +172 / -8

The childish reactions to tonight’s Tucker show says a lot about irrationality & hypocrisy. If you sit and listen to everything he said, he’s clearly focused on the truth and wanting Dems and the MSM to let the investigation unfold. He didn’t condemn today’s press conference. To the people raging over his fact that Powell has not provided evidence to his show: He’s not discounting her at all. All the “cucker tarlson” haters come off exactly like the leftists we despise. It’s pathetic, and the smart ones here can see right through you.

Of course, I’ll be downvoted. I don’t care. I’m not part of a club. I think independently and can recognize Carlson’s quest for the truth. He’s still on Trump’s side.

Comments (144)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
Picard 4 points ago +6 / -2

Your confirmation bias is showing.

-1
Anaconda -1 points ago +3 / -4

u/ToddHarsh is a cucker cultist. this cult believes cucker is the chosen one and he must be the presidential nominee in 2024 or 2028.

cucker could eat these cultists' babies in front of them and these cultists would be telling us how wonderful cucker is for doing this.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-5
ToddHarsh [S] -5 points ago +2 / -7

Enlighten me then.

5
Picard 5 points ago +5 / -0

I watched the segment and to me Tucker seemed more upset that Sidney blew him off. If he had actually searched for evidence (which we have all seen here on thedonald for weeks now), he would have found it, or at least found very suspicious behavior on the part of the voting records.

The implication that Tucker made was that Sidney is lying, as if he couldn't give her the benefit of the doubt. He had no reason to air that segment, and I believe that if he truly were on our side, he wouldn't have. No reason to attack your side if you don't have to. It was a private exchange between him and Sidney, and it should have remained that way.

-4
ToddHarsh [S] -4 points ago +2 / -6

I agree he seemed salty about her refusing to give evidence, but I don’t agree that he accused her of lying. She’s making grandiose claims of conspiracy. She better have proof beyond Glenn Beck-style connect-the-dots.

3
Picard 3 points ago +3 / -0

Her reputation as an attorney precedes her. With a statement like what she made, she's putting her brand and future business on the line.

Again, the conversation between Tucker and Sidney should have remained private. He chose to be gossipy and reveal it to the world, something an honorable man would not have done, IMO.