Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
but some british math dude on Youtube made some graphs and said there was no fraud
the british math man whose videos conveniently pop up in my recommended in the middle of the mess to explain away what I saw at 4am on November 4th wouldn't lie to me now would he?
The state legislatures in Penn and Michigan are going to the White House according to Faux. Not sure how many. Can’t imagine anything they are there to talk about other than not certifying.
I watch everything. I even watch the leftist ropoganda stations sometimes. I want to know what people are saying. I can make up my own mind about what is bullshit and what is true. But I want to know how people are framing things, what they are omitting what they are saying.
this. how they frame their arguments and the narrative they push tells you a lot about what they know/what they have as far as evidence/what theyre scared of
I do the same thing. It’s getting harder and harder to do so as the divide has almost doubled in 2 weeks. I find myself talking back to them and then needing to poop to clear out the filth.
I mean the reality is the market is diversifying where every little sub political persuasion is getting a news network. The socialists go to mslsd. The neoliberals go to criminal news network. The neocons go to fox and the rest of us go to oann and newsmax.
You don't need to watch all of them. They're spewing out the same narrative, their talking points are identical, and they'll never reveal anything they don't want you to know.
I used to think that way, but then 4 years ago I saw CNN put a background image of Syrian President Assad in a news piece about President Trump, and the news piece had nothing to do with Syria or even Russia. The image was a "Russia, Russia, Russia!" mindfuck. If they're going to screw with your mind subliminally, then I fear it's unsafe to watch.
Agreed. We should not sit here and act like Newsmax is the best thing since sliced bread... their jabs at the left are childish, pointless, and in your face at times. I feel it's fair and possibly needed given the current state of the media, but it gives me CNN vibes with a right leaning slant.
I don’t watch Fox (no cable TV) but I do watch local stations, just to see what the normies are viewing and how the news is being spun. I think it is not bad to do this, as we get a better grasp of what everyday grandma is seeing.
I was like this prior to the election because I thought both sides had a slant and the truth was somewhere in the middle... Now it's clear the truth doesn't exist in the MSM. They've all been nothing more than Deep State mouthpieces for decades.
I guess because Fox is so openly against Trump now, if they're admitting that the PA and MI state legislatures aren't certifying for Biden when 200k biden votes in detroit alone are suspect and 700k in philly/pburg are suspect means that it's probably gonna happen. Now we just need kemp and ducey to stop talking about 'what' they support and actually audit 9 million votes and find that -coincidentally- 3 million democratic votes can't be verified. Once Trump has his 270 and Wisconsin recounts and audits and proves there was fraud, then we take nevada and the michigan senate seat and the arizona senate seat and dab on the democrats forever by proving fraud in every swing state and taking it all back- proving Trump is the most popular president since Reagan and half the dem votes are fraudulent and can't be proven to be real people who exist.
Whats this obsession with NEWS NETWORKS in the first place, you all seem to treat them like your fav basketball team or game of thrones!!!
It's 2020 if you're still getting news told to you by the lying, narrative pushing lamestream media instead of sourcing your own info, then you deserve to drown in the Commie scum pond you just let steal a fucking election
It’s not really faithless electors. If you have sufficient fraud so as to make the actual outcome of the election impossible to know, it can’t possibly be the case that elections have to be certified and electors have to be pledged. Rather the electors simply cannot be sent.
I saw the same video. If the Brits couldn’t figure out our “one if by land two if by sea” code, I don’t expect them to figure out all this voting software BS either
Does this guy make any statements on why Benford's Law applies here, even though the majority of the numbers are the same order of magnitude? I watched the first ~10 min, seems he put a lot of work into this but it's meaningless if the law doesn't work.
The divide between people that support Trump in UK and people that don't is the same as in America. The same situation is occurring there. Deep state and both parties are corrupt. As for the youths that failed to be brainwashed by the media, the same neurological divide exists
The British Unis are just as infiltrated by lefties as ours (and probably EVEN MORE SO!). Its Europe after all.
The lefty Brits are still butthurt over Brexit, so they're gonna lash out when the feel they're not getting the outcome they want.
I still love the Numberphile, Periodic Videos, Sixty Symbols, and other videos that come out of that Uni, though. One somewhat political video out of all that they have on their site is not gonna make me stop watching.
However, once our President proves the fraud, they OWE us a video showing how it was proved. In the name of statistical science, of course!
That maths guy is just an idiot is basically the tl:dr.
It's almost hard to describe just how wrong he was. Not only does he literally go: "Here, let me just arbitrarily invert this graph so they look the same"... but he completely ignores where the data falls on the Y axis.. which is kind of the crux of the entire argument.
Trump almost never got more votes than there were republicans in the area. Biden almost never got less votes than there were Democrats in the area. And when we're talking about someone like Trump, who has a 95% approval rating among Democrats... and is someone who gained in every demographic that is typically not Republican... the numbers just don't add up.
And when we're talking about someone like Trump, who has a 95% approval rating among Democrats.
lol what
spez: I guess I'm mostly interested in knowing why, if we're using the Trump graphs to indicate fraud, why the Biden graphs look the same. I'm sure Dr Shiva mentioned it but tbh the video was a little dry and my brain is a little fried today so it probably went in one ear and out the other.
double spez: also if he ever explained the wonky math on the Wayne county graph, which I haven't seen a lot of people bring up but really confuses me.
Whoops. I actually meant to say 95% approval among Republicans... pretty big fuck up there.
The biggest difference between the two graphs, is where they are on the Y-axis. You can't simply look at the slope being negative as the number of people from a specific party goes up...especially so when the Y-axis is actually crossing from positive %'s across zero, to negative %'s.
The difference to notice in the two graphs is that the vast majority of Bidens is above 0% (meaning that no matter the party support in an area, he pretty much always gets more voters than his party does... inversely, this means that he pretty much always had Republicans or the vast majority of Independents voting for him.).
Trumps on the other hand has the vast majority below 0%. That means that in pretty much all circumstances, he had less people voting for him than the number of Republicans. So as I was attempting to explain before, when he has 95% approval among Republicans, in some areas he apparently only had like 50% of the Republicans actually voting for him, and apparently zero Independents, and obviously no Dems.
I respectfully disagree. Your statement was that the left isn't competent to pull this off. That would mean they have some, however minute competence somewhere.
I believe they are lacking and devoid of any competence.
The minions aren’t competent. They are violent. The higher ups (higher than Obama and Soros) should not be underestimated. We can only lose by not preparing properly... please approach them seriously.
Competent enough to infiltrate every facet of our government and institutions over the course of decades and to repeatedly organize wide-scale fraud while controlling a narrative on every single platform...just to name some examples of their capability.
Oh they're competent alright. I think they're slipping because we threw a giant fucking wrench in their plans, their old leaders are getting dementia, and their young leaders are fucking degenerates who have illegal acts and drug binges leaking all over the place... But the handlers are still in place and they still hold massive power over the world.
I was just dissecting the sentence. Don't necessarily agree with the statement.
But you do raise a good point. It's really the old guard lefties with the plan and actual competence. Their plan involved creating an army of brainwashed sheep, leaving very few choices to pass the baton to.
You people are blowing the Tucker Carlson monologue way out of proportion. All he said was that Sidney Powell is alleging the biggest political scandal in US history (the dominion vote-switching algorithm) and that he tried to pursue the evidence, which she has not presented (true).
I understand that Powell wants to keep her cards close to her chest, but it is Tucker’s job to pursue the truth. He tried to, and wasn’t able to get answers. That’s literally all he said.
If you haven’t watched it, you should. If you have, maybe you need to re-watch it. Tucker said nothing wrong, and you’re all acting like a bunch of pussy ass lefties who can’t handle a take that hurts your fee-fees.
Yup, and notice how that anaconda fag deleted all his comments and his account right after everyone started acting like he’s the second coming of Christ.
anaconda may be a faggot but he also was right about Cucker. there's no excuse for what he said tonight. Ms. Powell already explained why she's not revealing evidence. what the fuck people... it's like nobody here even watched the presser. gtfo
Tucker isn’t a journalist. Only another hypnotist. His favorite deliberate facial expression of his mouth agape is like every youtube thumbnail designed to attract views. He tosses a gold coin to the crowd, some inconsequential social issue like 76 genders, to distract us from the treasure chest that is ripping the fabric of our country and constitution apart. Glorified controlled opposition, because everyone else sucks even more than him.
I get that he has to toe the line for the MSM and maybe he isn’t as stale as he is on his show, behind the scenes. But that’s exactly why we shouldn’t respect him as a bastion of truth. Literally controlled, corralled horse in his enclosure, opposition. And the MSM just attached spurs to their boots. And seeing how they treated Judge Jeanine, a true patriot, the muzzle is their next step.
It’s an easy target that even most libtards have trouble denying. In the end the gender spectrum bull shit is but a small fleck in the communist effort to demoralize our nation. Realize I am not against you, but I expect better from you. As offended as you are to resort to emotional ad hominem. The Quran IS toilet paper. But so is your defense of Tucker’s milquetoast approach. Even Lauren Southern redpilled more than him. He’s cattle.
We agree with each other. Just not on him covering the same gender shit practically every time I turn him on. So purposely useless. He’s not reaching any of the people who actually need to hear it. His base is beyond that and it’s baby food at this point. Understand that’s how it’s inconsequential. You could replace Tucker with useless Bill Barr and have him act dumbfounded at trannies without missing a beat. Megyn Kelly pretended for a long time.
Nobody salvageable needs proof the gender spectrum propaganda is garbage. This is how making a whole show about it becomes inconsequential. He’s just there to make us mad at the TV while congress fucks lady liberty in the back room. Cucker. Carlson.
If he were a real journalist with integrity, he would've been gone already. He wouldn't still show up at prime time. He's a product of that lamestream media environment. He wouldn't deviate from any of their talking points even if he knows better. When FOX news becomes FAUX news, don't expect anybody in that mud pit to remain clean.
I hope he’s working on it. I give him shit but I feel bad for the man and do like him well enough. He was much better before he replaced O’Reilly’s timeslot. His whole demeanor began to change. He needs to decide between keeping his cushy job and the right thing to do. We know what Judge Jeanine chose, and probably Eric Bolling too. The road to ruin doesn’t begin with a step. It begins by standing still.
Right now he serves as the cash cow for the other fake friend commies on Fox. So again, back to my cattle comparison... Motherfuckers have him by the nips.
This community is absolutely obsessed with throwing anyone who doesn’t agree with them 100% of the time on every topic overboard. It’s a toxic and, quite frankly, immature attitude. People need to chill.
Here's the thing, with the MSM the journalists and personalities are by default not our friends. To get to their positions, they have likely been compromised. They also receive their talking points from the CIA. They have to be treated with the utmost skepticism and once their true colors are revealed, that's it
If people don't act that way? Well you end up with a media like you have now
People like yourself act like everything is binary. Everyone and everything (yes, even Trump himself) should be looked at with a desire to understand his/her strengths, weaknesses and external influences. Skepticism and inquiry should be the default position regardless of who we’re talking about. It’s perfectly fine to doubt someone’s judgement or question their motives without immediately assuming they’re part of an enemy conspiracy if they behave in ways that you disagree with.
Yes it is fine, unless you have knowledge of things like Operation Mockingbird and understand that people don't get into these positions without being compromised to begin with. The skepticism applied to them must be much higher.
"People like me" don't do anything of the sort. I recognize that almost everything in life is more complex than we give credit for and is typically caused by a large confluence of factors.
I totally agree everyone should be viewed with skepticism. But, this is the multi-variable analysis. When you know about Mockingbird, when you see it in action time after time.
The press is an enemy. When you give them the benefit of the doubt after they lie and cover up for criminals, perpetuating falsehoods like WMDs, which put the world into chaos, and you see that no one is held responsible. All of this together, plus so much more, when you see it you understand that are an enemy - they have a shorter leash than others.
Just because Tucker makes funny faces and says things you agree with most of the time doesn't change that.
If you think Operation Mockingbird is why journalism is dead, you're greatly over-estimating the power of the CIA and greatly underestimating the fallibility of human nature. People in the media, like Tucker, being skeptical about the strength of Trump's legal case doesn't require a conspiracy to explain it. That's a completely unnecessary logical leap without any rationale to back it up.
Now everyone in these forums are jumping on the Lou Dobbs and Maria Bartiromo bandwagon... and then tomorrow they will claim they're sell-outs when they say something they disagree with. They'll claim some conspiracy or greed or whatever. This is just a bunch of children without the experience or understanding to view things skeptically without immediately needing to place everyone neatly onto Team A or Team B.
Tucker is Tucker. You may not understand why he does what he does, but making unfounded assumptions about him in order place him on one team or another is just an attempt to make yourself feel more comfortable about things you can't know or control.
I would like to know what information you have to show the CIA does not have the power to do something like that. Look at Epstein and all the people who were on his jet, is it such a leap to think people who are put into these positions of power by "the machine" are compromised in some way? Is it so strange to think news anchors are just actors?
You won't find me on their trains either, but you are right about how quickly people jump around here, mob mentality is a powerful thing no matter what side it is that's doing so.
Tucker is Tucker, yes. And Tucker is likely an actor, a Mockingbird asset. Do you think he writes his own scripts? That he's reading from a text that he himself wrote? Do you think he's the one in there doing the investigative journalism and he's reporting on what he found? No, it's the team. Do you think the guy who didn't want to talk too much about the treasonous and otherwise disgusting and illegal acts of Hunter Biden because they're "friends" is just this journalist pursuing the truth? If I found out one of my friends was a crack addict who was sexting his underage niece in between taking meetings to sell out the country for money, I don't think I'd continue to count myself among his friends, and I'd think most sensible people would feel the same. I think the only way that could make sense is if Tucker knew Hunter had a change of heart and really was trying to come clean by letting his laptop be confiscated, but then again if that were the case, Tucker would want to help his friend clear his conscience by making the stories known.
Tucker's skepticism appears to be more than anything an act, to keep the audience he's built up changing their opinions along with him, following the whims of the Deep State, Swamp, Illuminati, Globalists, whatever you want to call them.
These assumptions are not unfounded, but there is some required reading, and it also does require a bit of belief that this is how the world works (and as of late I see less and less evidence to the contrary). I don't think we are going to see eye to eye on this. If we're going to end our points on psychoanalysis: Perhaps you believing "Tucker is Tucker" as if that makes everything make sense is your way of denying the reality that's just behind the curtain, shielding yourself from seeing the bad that you feel powerless to stop and are too uncomfortable to acknowledge.
“Toxic” has been used for ages to describe bad behavior online, first within the online gaming scene and then later on social media and the rest of the internet. If you seriously think it’s a Communist propaganda buzzword, you’re an idiot.
Bullshit. There's plenty out there to back her up.
Sworn affidavits. Machine user manuals. Statistical anomalies that are unexplainable by anything other than fraud. And Powell is the most credible lawyer in this country and a patriot.
Yeah seriously. I was expecting something much worse based on people's reactions.
It's unfair to say she hasn't presented any evidence though, as they have released a number of the affidavits. The vast majority of evidence remains unreleased though.
Reasonable skepticism from a journalist right now is fair with the amount of actual evidence we have seen on Dominion specifically. We will see the data and hard facts in court.
But Tucker went into almost a full attack mode like a fucking sellout propaganda mouthpiece. Fuck faux
Just saw the piece. He didn’t say anything that wasn’t true, and to me it sounds more like he was trying to get her to come on the show for a full hour to lay out all the details of her accusations. I wouldn’t consider Tucker cucked yet, and of all people I would not throw someone of his integrity under the bus lightly. Feels like he just wants to do a big hour long piece that could be the highest rated hour of his life.
Controlled opposition would be ‘she has no evidence’. Tucker’s saying ‘please come on our show to show us the evidence because if you don’t then it’s hard to know if there is any’. Even then he’s not talking about all of it, as there are plenty of things already out now that he acknowledged. He means her damning points that we still haven’t seen her present evidence on regarding Dominion and whistle blowers and such.
I don't disagree, but that would be some serious 4d chess for a cable news network.
"Let's tank our ratings so the left takes us seriously so that we can attack the right's frontline soldiers so that they can present the real evidence that gets everyone on the same page about voter fraud and then we all get on board the Trump train".
I'm surprised to hear that this is your take, after seeing other things you have posted that are consistently funny and reasonable MAGA. He's a total transparent piece of garbage. Sidney already explained why she's not presenting "evidence". Cucker sounds like he's running with the "lite" version of the MSM bullshit. He's complete garbage. Why do you think Trump heaps praise on Sean but says noting about Cucker.
Trump knows.
Seeing some of the stuff others are piling on Tucker now, I will admit that I haven’t seen as much as they seem to have. Regarding him saying we need to stop talking about Hunter way back after he initially covered it, it was him trying to shift the focus to the corruption and away from the dick pics, which I can relate to because although it does seem like Hunter fucked his niece and her under aged friends, that got in the way of people acknowledging the bigger issues about Joe Biden selling influence.
I will concede that looking more into it, Tucker is likely being put in a spot by Fox when it comes to covering the voter fraud. Unless he can present direct proof, they’re clamping down, so he’s instead inviting people on to show it as his way of covering it. I’m willing to at least wait on passing judgement on him though.
Another thing I thought of regarding Trump not mentioning Tucker is to avoid hurting Tucker’s brand by directly associating it with supporting Trump. Using Scott Adams as an example, Trump retweeted him, and now Scott Adams is ‘literally a Nazi’ despite being out here in the Bay with me and having done a lot of good here in the Bay for folks of all races and genders. He’s ridiculed and dismissed. Letting Tucker do his thing without praising him is in both of their best interests. It’s kind of like the HCQ+Zinc situation where just because Trump supported it, suddenly a drug we’ve used forever that seems to help is completely unsafe and crazy to take.
I’ll go out swinging for Trump no matter what happens, but don’t want us to turn into the left where we immediately eat and attempt to cancel our own. For some things like Fox in general, I’m fine with that, but not with other examples like Tucker and Tim Pool, at least not right now.
No reason to cancel Tucker. Let the normies have him. We don't need him. I agree with some of what you said but not everything. Trump had no issue "hurting Sean's brand." In fact I'd suggest that the reason we won so many down ballot races is directly due to Trump "hurting their brand". That's a media/MSM narrative and you should not buy into it. They are trying to shift you.
It’s possible Trump might know something we don’t. At least right now though it sounds like Tucker is just trying to be a journalist, and potentially is frustrated with the timeline going on right now. I’m fully willing to throw anyone under the bus if they deserve it, but at least right now, I’m willing to give Tucker the benefit of the doubt because he’s probably the best news guy on popular TV. He’s one of the only guys on TV that’s even covered any of this stuff.
Bullshit. You've been hypnotized. He's not a traitor, he's a fucking sellout. He doesn't give a fuck about the truth. WTF was that bullshit story with the laptop stuff that got "stolen" in the mail? That was driven top down and CUCKER went along with it that little faggot. Fuck that guy. Why do you think Trump always praises Sean and never CUCKER. HE KNOWS.
I think people need to stop throwing everyone under the bus instantly around here. Like Tim Pool. Accept the help you get. Pool is one of the few that’s covering the voter fraud daily. Him saying it’s a long shot is always continually coupled with he thinks trump might do it. On the live streams you see more of that.
News flash! It’s okay if people don’t agree with you on every topic 100% of the time. This doesn’t make them traitors or bad people. Acting as such just makes you sound paranoid and insecure.
I don’t even think everyone here would agree with each other on 100% of things if we all started talking about it. We need to not end up like the left where we start eating our own. I’m fine with the high energy vibe and this site being for Trump supporters only. In line with that, maybe we don’t throw people under the bus that support Trump but don’t agree with us on everything? Both Tim Pool and Tucker Carlson voted for Trump, spent the better part of the year campaigning for Trump, and are actively covering the voter fraud when few others will. I think Vaush was one of, if not the only, guest Tim Pool ever had that didn’t come on to say ‘hey yeah I hate leftists and I’m voting Trump’. Even with Vaush, Tim spent the entire time disagreeing with him.
I’m fine going out swinging for Trump. Let’s not start swinging at each other though.
I believe he said that he wanted proof and wanted to see evidence of the claims she was making. I feel the same way. Nothing wrong with that. I hold lefties and nighties to the same standards. Sorry never been a rah.. rah... team player. That being said I think she has the proof.
Lol, it’s really quite amazing how reasonable comments get downvoted on this site. I guess we’re supposed to all just hop on the “Cucker” bandwagon in the blink of an eye after years of holding Tucker up as a bastion of MAGA.
Tucker said nothing wrong. I’d like to see the evidence of vote-switching as well. I believe she has it, but also recognize she may not want to reveal it publicly before court. Tucker was just doing his job in pursuing the evidence. He never said Sidney Powell is full of shit, only that she didn’t provide the evidence his show was pursuing.
The group think is strong tonight. Stop acting like leftist pussies!
Normally if someone on Fox News called out a person who supported Trump the MSM would have reported it... like the way the Commies tell me Biden won because Fox News said so. The Democrats pretending to be reporters are totally ignoring Tucker... again something is off.
That’s good to know. I appreciate what Tucker us trying to do but there really is no point for the lawyers to share anything with any media at this point.
Ms. Powell explained why she's not providing more evidence at her presser today. Why do people here not see that and why are the defending this fucking sell out. It's sick. Let him go people. We have new and better voices than fucking pancake makeup face CUCKER CARLSON.
This is entirely consistent with the findings from Braynard reported today, which you can project given the numbers he provided to be about 69,000 Republican absentee votes "disappearing."
My grandma in PA "voted by mail" but she didn't vote at all. She is repulsed by Trump and my dead pop pop would never let her vote democrat. So she didn't vote. You are the first person I told since this site has banned me multiple times for raising alarms leading up to the election. FUCK MODS. FUCK JANNIES. FUCK BOLTON. FUCK HASPEL. FUCK MODS.
We knew before the election PA would be the largest source of fuckery. Mailed my PA absentee ballot 2 weeks before election day and they never counted it
Just saw a video on tik tok of some teen who exported the voter info and found tens of thousands of obviously fraudulent votes. Gave me hope for the younger generation. https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMJQjF9fN/
When election results are not clear, the solution is a runoff election.
It’s a tried and true process. People will finally have trust.
Let’s go! Trump vs Biden, no Jorgensen, no 3rd parties.
Let’s ensure the voter’s choice is clear with a runoff in those disputed precincts, counties, or even whole states. A new vote will provide confidence. Both parties should agree if they are honest.
In person, paper ballots, only one choice: T or B, very simple.
That's not a good analogy in this case. We have hard data at this point that has been collected with sound principles, and he's using probability to extrapolate the sample to a full population.
Side Note: They're called suppressors because they only suppress the sound, not silence the sound. Silencers are leftist newspeak. Movie level suppressor noise is nowhere near accurate either. Suppressors are much louder in real life.
Suppressors are also called cans by some in the military.
It's like sitting on a couch cushion verses sitting on a wooden chair when farting. The cushion will lesson the sound, but it won't make a loud fart disappear. Moreover, like a gun, the deadliness isn't much related to how loud it is.
What's everyone going wonky soft here about? There was/is such openly BLATANT fraud even the Demrats and Rinos are starting to crap in their pants and are talk about it. STFU and get out of your daze. Trump won the election and the cockroach globalist demrat traitors are NOT going to steal it from we the PEOPLE. HELL NO. Nazi Germany does not count of fkg vote! FU mofo's!
Honestly does it even matter when ballots in GA, WI, PA, AZ, NV, MI were all incorrectly submitted due to illegal changes to how mail balloting and chain-of-command are supposed to work? That's 4 million mostly-Biden ballots that are essentially illegal votes and should be trashcan.jpg'd. Why even have laws and courts if a rogue democratic executive (or rogue democratic legislature or rogue democratic judge for that matter) just screams that his word is law?
Whew, the democrats sure are absolutely cancerous for any attempts at creating a functional, law-based society. It's almost like the ancient Babylonians created a written law code for this SPECIFIC reason. Weird how we're somehow falling back to pre-Babylonian times, with dems issuing edicts whenever it suits them and idiots just going along with it.
When election results are not clear, the solution is a runoff election.
It’s a tried and true process. People will finally have trust.
Let’s go! Trump vs Biden, no Jorgensen, no 3rd parties.
Let’s ensure the voter’s choice is clear with a runoff in those disputed precincts, counties, or even whole states. A new vote will provide confidence. Both parties should agree if they are honest.
In person, paper ballots, only one choice: T or B, very simple.
So he swore that his analysis raises questions, but doesn't claim it proves anything. He needs to use stronger wording and say his analysis "Proves that voter fraud is plausible, if not probable in PA" otherwise idk how much this changes things. Maybe it will open another can of worms though which is a big plus
This is not evidence .. it is expert testimony based on statistical analysis.
That is legally evidence. It may not be, "entered into evidence" in the same manner as a physical object/map/diagram/statistic, but it is absolutely evidence.
but some british math dude on Youtube made some graphs and said there was no fraud
the british math man whose videos conveniently pop up in my recommended in the middle of the mess to explain away what I saw at 4am on November 4th wouldn't lie to me now would he?
lol no conspiracy COPE /s
The state legislatures in Penn and Michigan are going to the White House according to Faux. Not sure how many. Can’t imagine anything they are there to talk about other than not certifying.
I watch everything. I even watch the leftist ropoganda stations sometimes. I want to know what people are saying. I can make up my own mind about what is bullshit and what is true. But I want to know how people are framing things, what they are omitting what they are saying.
this. how they frame their arguments and the narrative they push tells you a lot about what they know/what they have as far as evidence/what theyre scared of
I do the same thing. It’s getting harder and harder to do so as the divide has almost doubled in 2 weeks. I find myself talking back to them and then needing to poop to clear out the filth.
If you listen closely to your poop you’ll learn twice as much truth as what you’ll hear on CNN it’s crazy
I mean the reality is the market is diversifying where every little sub political persuasion is getting a news network. The socialists go to mslsd. The neoliberals go to criminal news network. The neocons go to fox and the rest of us go to oann and newsmax.
What, when they act like this? https://thedonald.win/p/11QRfYrUuH/the-most-hilarious-video-cult-/c/
NPC’s
You don't need to watch all of them. They're spewing out the same narrative, their talking points are identical, and they'll never reveal anything they don't want you to know.
I used to think that way, but then 4 years ago I saw CNN put a background image of Syrian President Assad in a news piece about President Trump, and the news piece had nothing to do with Syria or even Russia. The image was a "Russia, Russia, Russia!" mindfuck. If they're going to screw with your mind subliminally, then I fear it's unsafe to watch.
All of it is trying to do that. Everyone’s news information does that.
Agreed. We should not sit here and act like Newsmax is the best thing since sliced bread... their jabs at the left are childish, pointless, and in your face at times. I feel it's fair and possibly needed given the current state of the media, but it gives me CNN vibes with a right leaning slant.
I don’t watch Fox (no cable TV) but I do watch local stations, just to see what the normies are viewing and how the news is being spun. I think it is not bad to do this, as we get a better grasp of what everyday grandma is seeing.
This! I want every voice out there. Then I'll decide what to beleive. Not Zuckerbergs massaging the facts checkers.
On a long enough timeline, markets always work even when the commodity is ideas, narrative and information.
Free markets sure.
I was like this prior to the election because I thought both sides had a slant and the truth was somewhere in the middle... Now it's clear the truth doesn't exist in the MSM. They've all been nothing more than Deep State mouthpieces for decades.
It’s not in the middle. It’s like a puzzle that you have to piece together from all the information. It’s scrambled.
I guess because Fox is so openly against Trump now, if they're admitting that the PA and MI state legislatures aren't certifying for Biden when 200k biden votes in detroit alone are suspect and 700k in philly/pburg are suspect means that it's probably gonna happen. Now we just need kemp and ducey to stop talking about 'what' they support and actually audit 9 million votes and find that -coincidentally- 3 million democratic votes can't be verified. Once Trump has his 270 and Wisconsin recounts and audits and proves there was fraud, then we take nevada and the michigan senate seat and the arizona senate seat and dab on the democrats forever by proving fraud in every swing state and taking it all back- proving Trump is the most popular president since Reagan and half the dem votes are fraudulent and can't be proven to be real people who exist.
Whats this obsession with NEWS NETWORKS in the first place, you all seem to treat them like your fav basketball team or game of thrones!!!
It's 2020 if you're still getting news told to you by the lying, narrative pushing lamestream media instead of sourcing your own info, then you deserve to drown in the Commie scum pond you just let steal a fucking election
It’s not really faithless electors. If you have sufficient fraud so as to make the actual outcome of the election impossible to know, it can’t possibly be the case that elections have to be certified and electors have to be pledged. Rather the electors simply cannot be sent.
definitely all a bunch of copespiracy theories /s
There's no evidence of anything! Source: Dude trust me like bro haha
I saw the same video. If the Brits couldn’t figure out our “one if by land two if by sea” code, I don’t expect them to figure out all this voting software BS either
Does this guy make any statements on why Benford's Law applies here, even though the majority of the numbers are the same order of magnitude? I watched the first ~10 min, seems he put a lot of work into this but it's meaningless if the law doesn't work.
The divide between people that support Trump in UK and people that don't is the same as in America. The same situation is occurring there. Deep state and both parties are corrupt. As for the youths that failed to be brainwashed by the media, the same neurological divide exists
If it was 4 AM on Nov 3rd, that's a big problem..........you meant 4 AM Nov 4th.
No one likes a smart ass
Don't be a lying dog faced pony soldier
No one likes tranny's bro.... You have a dick get over it
True thanks lol
It could very well be. A little “head start”.
C'Mon Man
Technically Correct.
The best kind of correct.
I was subscribed to him. Unfortunate that he’s getting involved.
The British Unis are just as infiltrated by lefties as ours (and probably EVEN MORE SO!). Its Europe after all.
The lefty Brits are still butthurt over Brexit, so they're gonna lash out when the feel they're not getting the outcome they want.
I still love the Numberphile, Periodic Videos, Sixty Symbols, and other videos that come out of that Uni, though. One somewhat political video out of all that they have on their site is not gonna make me stop watching.
However, once our President proves the fraud, they OWE us a video showing how it was proved. In the name of statistical science, of course!
The maths guy gets powned here
https://youtu.be/R8xb6qJKJqU
What's the tl;dr?
That maths guy is just an idiot is basically the tl:dr.
It's almost hard to describe just how wrong he was. Not only does he literally go: "Here, let me just arbitrarily invert this graph so they look the same"... but he completely ignores where the data falls on the Y axis.. which is kind of the crux of the entire argument.
Trump almost never got more votes than there were republicans in the area. Biden almost never got less votes than there were Democrats in the area. And when we're talking about someone like Trump, who has a 95% approval rating among Democrats... and is someone who gained in every demographic that is typically not Republican... the numbers just don't add up.
lol what
spez: I guess I'm mostly interested in knowing why, if we're using the Trump graphs to indicate fraud, why the Biden graphs look the same. I'm sure Dr Shiva mentioned it but tbh the video was a little dry and my brain is a little fried today so it probably went in one ear and out the other.
double spez: also if he ever explained the wonky math on the Wayne county graph, which I haven't seen a lot of people bring up but really confuses me.
Whoops. I actually meant to say 95% approval among Republicans... pretty big fuck up there.
The biggest difference between the two graphs, is where they are on the Y-axis. You can't simply look at the slope being negative as the number of people from a specific party goes up...especially so when the Y-axis is actually crossing from positive %'s across zero, to negative %'s.
The difference to notice in the two graphs is that the vast majority of Bidens is above 0% (meaning that no matter the party support in an area, he pretty much always gets more voters than his party does... inversely, this means that he pretty much always had Republicans or the vast majority of Independents voting for him.).
Trumps on the other hand has the vast majority below 0%. That means that in pretty much all circumstances, he had less people voting for him than the number of Republicans. So as I was attempting to explain before, when he has 95% approval among Republicans, in some areas he apparently only had like 50% of the Republicans actually voting for him, and apparently zero Independents, and obviously no Dems.
Maths guy went to the University of Western Australia.
The left isn’t competent enough to pull this off.
HOLD THE LINE
The left isn't competent.
FTFY
That’s what I said.
I respectfully disagree. Your statement was that the left isn't competent to pull this off. That would mean they have some, however minute competence somewhere.
I believe they are lacking and devoid of any competence.
The minions aren’t competent. They are violent. The higher ups (higher than Obama and Soros) should not be underestimated. We can only lose by not preparing properly... please approach them seriously.
I.e.: they lack competence. Like I said.
I believe it is the use of the qualifier "enough" that implies they have some level of competence. Just not what it takes to pull this off.
How about both of you stop being fags
Then you are severely underestimating our opponent and cannot begin to understand the situation at present.
Competent enough to infiltrate every facet of our government and institutions over the course of decades and to repeatedly organize wide-scale fraud while controlling a narrative on every single platform...just to name some examples of their capability.
Oh they're competent alright. I think they're slipping because we threw a giant fucking wrench in their plans, their old leaders are getting dementia, and their young leaders are fucking degenerates who have illegal acts and drug binges leaking all over the place... But the handlers are still in place and they still hold massive power over the world.
I was just dissecting the sentence. Don't necessarily agree with the statement.
But you do raise a good point. It's really the old guard lefties with the plan and actual competence. Their plan involved creating an army of brainwashed sheep, leaving very few choices to pass the baton to.
Theyve had a lot of practice
Tucker just said TODAY that the President has no evidence, that his claims are baseless
u/anaconda was right all along
CUCKER CARLSON
You people are blowing the Tucker Carlson monologue way out of proportion. All he said was that Sidney Powell is alleging the biggest political scandal in US history (the dominion vote-switching algorithm) and that he tried to pursue the evidence, which she has not presented (true).
I understand that Powell wants to keep her cards close to her chest, but it is Tucker’s job to pursue the truth. He tried to, and wasn’t able to get answers. That’s literally all he said.
If you haven’t watched it, you should. If you have, maybe you need to re-watch it. Tucker said nothing wrong, and you’re all acting like a bunch of pussy ass lefties who can’t handle a take that hurts your fee-fees.
Too many shills around these days. That anaconda faggot being brought up over and over sure smells like astroturfing to me.
Do these stupid fucks think this is Reddit? I hope people aren’t falling for this shit.
Yup, and notice how that anaconda fag deleted all his comments and his account right after everyone started acting like he’s the second coming of Christ.
anaconda may be a faggot but he also was right about Cucker. there's no excuse for what he said tonight. Ms. Powell already explained why she's not revealing evidence. what the fuck people... it's like nobody here even watched the presser. gtfo
I’m not sure you watched the monologue.
You’re acting as if tucker shit all over trump and pretended the mere thought of voter fraud is ridiculous.
Um no. He shit all over Powell. Did you not watch it?
Tucker isn’t a journalist. Only another hypnotist. His favorite deliberate facial expression of his mouth agape is like every youtube thumbnail designed to attract views. He tosses a gold coin to the crowd, some inconsequential social issue like 76 genders, to distract us from the treasure chest that is ripping the fabric of our country and constitution apart. Glorified controlled opposition, because everyone else sucks even more than him.
I get that he has to toe the line for the MSM and maybe he isn’t as stale as he is on his show, behind the scenes. But that’s exactly why we shouldn’t respect him as a bastion of truth. Literally controlled, corralled horse in his enclosure, opposition. And the MSM just attached spurs to their boots. And seeing how they treated Judge Jeanine, a true patriot, the muzzle is their next step.
It’s an easy target that even most libtards have trouble denying. In the end the gender spectrum bull shit is but a small fleck in the communist effort to demoralize our nation. Realize I am not against you, but I expect better from you. As offended as you are to resort to emotional ad hominem. The Quran IS toilet paper. But so is your defense of Tucker’s milquetoast approach. Even Lauren Southern redpilled more than him. He’s cattle.
We agree with each other. Just not on him covering the same gender shit practically every time I turn him on. So purposely useless. He’s not reaching any of the people who actually need to hear it. His base is beyond that and it’s baby food at this point. Understand that’s how it’s inconsequential. You could replace Tucker with useless Bill Barr and have him act dumbfounded at trannies without missing a beat. Megyn Kelly pretended for a long time.
Nobody salvageable needs proof the gender spectrum propaganda is garbage. This is how making a whole show about it becomes inconsequential. He’s just there to make us mad at the TV while congress fucks lady liberty in the back room. Cucker. Carlson.
He's a fucking piece of shit and I'm sick of the morons here defending him.
If he were a real journalist with integrity, he would've been gone already. He wouldn't still show up at prime time. He's a product of that lamestream media environment. He wouldn't deviate from any of their talking points even if he knows better. When FOX news becomes FAUX news, don't expect anybody in that mud pit to remain clean.
I hope he’s working on it. I give him shit but I feel bad for the man and do like him well enough. He was much better before he replaced O’Reilly’s timeslot. His whole demeanor began to change. He needs to decide between keeping his cushy job and the right thing to do. We know what Judge Jeanine chose, and probably Eric Bolling too. The road to ruin doesn’t begin with a step. It begins by standing still.
Right now he serves as the cash cow for the other fake friend commies on Fox. So again, back to my cattle comparison... Motherfuckers have him by the nips.
This community is absolutely obsessed with throwing anyone who doesn’t agree with them 100% of the time on every topic overboard. It’s a toxic and, quite frankly, immature attitude. People need to chill.
Here's the thing, with the MSM the journalists and personalities are by default not our friends. To get to their positions, they have likely been compromised. They also receive their talking points from the CIA. They have to be treated with the utmost skepticism and once their true colors are revealed, that's it
If people don't act that way? Well you end up with a media like you have now
People like yourself act like everything is binary. Everyone and everything (yes, even Trump himself) should be looked at with a desire to understand his/her strengths, weaknesses and external influences. Skepticism and inquiry should be the default position regardless of who we’re talking about. It’s perfectly fine to doubt someone’s judgement or question their motives without immediately assuming they’re part of an enemy conspiracy if they behave in ways that you disagree with.
Yes it is fine, unless you have knowledge of things like Operation Mockingbird and understand that people don't get into these positions without being compromised to begin with. The skepticism applied to them must be much higher.
"People like me" don't do anything of the sort. I recognize that almost everything in life is more complex than we give credit for and is typically caused by a large confluence of factors.
I totally agree everyone should be viewed with skepticism. But, this is the multi-variable analysis. When you know about Mockingbird, when you see it in action time after time.
The press is an enemy. When you give them the benefit of the doubt after they lie and cover up for criminals, perpetuating falsehoods like WMDs, which put the world into chaos, and you see that no one is held responsible. All of this together, plus so much more, when you see it you understand that are an enemy - they have a shorter leash than others.
Just because Tucker makes funny faces and says things you agree with most of the time doesn't change that.
If you think Operation Mockingbird is why journalism is dead, you're greatly over-estimating the power of the CIA and greatly underestimating the fallibility of human nature. People in the media, like Tucker, being skeptical about the strength of Trump's legal case doesn't require a conspiracy to explain it. That's a completely unnecessary logical leap without any rationale to back it up.
Now everyone in these forums are jumping on the Lou Dobbs and Maria Bartiromo bandwagon... and then tomorrow they will claim they're sell-outs when they say something they disagree with. They'll claim some conspiracy or greed or whatever. This is just a bunch of children without the experience or understanding to view things skeptically without immediately needing to place everyone neatly onto Team A or Team B.
Tucker is Tucker. You may not understand why he does what he does, but making unfounded assumptions about him in order place him on one team or another is just an attempt to make yourself feel more comfortable about things you can't know or control.
I would like to know what information you have to show the CIA does not have the power to do something like that. Look at Epstein and all the people who were on his jet, is it such a leap to think people who are put into these positions of power by "the machine" are compromised in some way? Is it so strange to think news anchors are just actors?
You won't find me on their trains either, but you are right about how quickly people jump around here, mob mentality is a powerful thing no matter what side it is that's doing so.
Tucker is Tucker, yes. And Tucker is likely an actor, a Mockingbird asset. Do you think he writes his own scripts? That he's reading from a text that he himself wrote? Do you think he's the one in there doing the investigative journalism and he's reporting on what he found? No, it's the team. Do you think the guy who didn't want to talk too much about the treasonous and otherwise disgusting and illegal acts of Hunter Biden because they're "friends" is just this journalist pursuing the truth? If I found out one of my friends was a crack addict who was sexting his underage niece in between taking meetings to sell out the country for money, I don't think I'd continue to count myself among his friends, and I'd think most sensible people would feel the same. I think the only way that could make sense is if Tucker knew Hunter had a change of heart and really was trying to come clean by letting his laptop be confiscated, but then again if that were the case, Tucker would want to help his friend clear his conscience by making the stories known.
Tucker's skepticism appears to be more than anything an act, to keep the audience he's built up changing their opinions along with him, following the whims of the Deep State, Swamp, Illuminati, Globalists, whatever you want to call them.
These assumptions are not unfounded, but there is some required reading, and it also does require a bit of belief that this is how the world works (and as of late I see less and less evidence to the contrary). I don't think we are going to see eye to eye on this. If we're going to end our points on psychoanalysis: Perhaps you believing "Tucker is Tucker" as if that makes everything make sense is your way of denying the reality that's just behind the curtain, shielding yourself from seeing the bad that you feel powerless to stop and are too uncomfortable to acknowledge.
“Toxic” has been used for ages to describe bad behavior online, first within the online gaming scene and then later on social media and the rest of the internet. If you seriously think it’s a Communist propaganda buzzword, you’re an idiot.
Bullshit. There's plenty out there to back her up.
Sworn affidavits. Machine user manuals. Statistical anomalies that are unexplainable by anything other than fraud. And Powell is the most credible lawyer in this country and a patriot.
Yeah seriously. I was expecting something much worse based on people's reactions.
It's unfair to say she hasn't presented any evidence though, as they have released a number of the affidavits. The vast majority of evidence remains unreleased though.
Reasonable skepticism from a journalist right now is fair with the amount of actual evidence we have seen on Dominion specifically. We will see the data and hard facts in court. But Tucker went into almost a full attack mode like a fucking sellout propaganda mouthpiece. Fuck faux
He's a fucking piece of shit. Change my mind.
Have a link?
No sir, I was watching. Never again!
Just saw the piece. He didn’t say anything that wasn’t true, and to me it sounds more like he was trying to get her to come on the show for a full hour to lay out all the details of her accusations. I wouldn’t consider Tucker cucked yet, and of all people I would not throw someone of his integrity under the bus lightly. Feels like he just wants to do a big hour long piece that could be the highest rated hour of his life.
Controlled opposition would be ‘she has no evidence’. Tucker’s saying ‘please come on our show to show us the evidence because if you don’t then it’s hard to know if there is any’. Even then he’s not talking about all of it, as there are plenty of things already out now that he acknowledged. He means her damning points that we still haven’t seen her present evidence on regarding Dominion and whistle blowers and such.
I don't disagree, but that would be some serious 4d chess for a cable news network.
"Let's tank our ratings so the left takes us seriously so that we can attack the right's frontline soldiers so that they can present the real evidence that gets everyone on the same page about voter fraud and then we all get on board the Trump train".
I don’t think it’s Fox News wide, just Tucker. The rest of fox outside of him and the other opinion pieces has been trash for a while.
I'm surprised to hear that this is your take, after seeing other things you have posted that are consistently funny and reasonable MAGA. He's a total transparent piece of garbage. Sidney already explained why she's not presenting "evidence". Cucker sounds like he's running with the "lite" version of the MSM bullshit. He's complete garbage. Why do you think Trump heaps praise on Sean but says noting about Cucker. Trump knows.
Seeing some of the stuff others are piling on Tucker now, I will admit that I haven’t seen as much as they seem to have. Regarding him saying we need to stop talking about Hunter way back after he initially covered it, it was him trying to shift the focus to the corruption and away from the dick pics, which I can relate to because although it does seem like Hunter fucked his niece and her under aged friends, that got in the way of people acknowledging the bigger issues about Joe Biden selling influence.
I will concede that looking more into it, Tucker is likely being put in a spot by Fox when it comes to covering the voter fraud. Unless he can present direct proof, they’re clamping down, so he’s instead inviting people on to show it as his way of covering it. I’m willing to at least wait on passing judgement on him though.
Another thing I thought of regarding Trump not mentioning Tucker is to avoid hurting Tucker’s brand by directly associating it with supporting Trump. Using Scott Adams as an example, Trump retweeted him, and now Scott Adams is ‘literally a Nazi’ despite being out here in the Bay with me and having done a lot of good here in the Bay for folks of all races and genders. He’s ridiculed and dismissed. Letting Tucker do his thing without praising him is in both of their best interests. It’s kind of like the HCQ+Zinc situation where just because Trump supported it, suddenly a drug we’ve used forever that seems to help is completely unsafe and crazy to take.
I’ll go out swinging for Trump no matter what happens, but don’t want us to turn into the left where we immediately eat and attempt to cancel our own. For some things like Fox in general, I’m fine with that, but not with other examples like Tucker and Tim Pool, at least not right now.
No reason to cancel Tucker. Let the normies have him. We don't need him. I agree with some of what you said but not everything. Trump had no issue "hurting Sean's brand." In fact I'd suggest that the reason we won so many down ballot races is directly due to Trump "hurting their brand". That's a media/MSM narrative and you should not buy into it. They are trying to shift you.
It’s possible Trump might know something we don’t. At least right now though it sounds like Tucker is just trying to be a journalist, and potentially is frustrated with the timeline going on right now. I’m fully willing to throw anyone under the bus if they deserve it, but at least right now, I’m willing to give Tucker the benefit of the doubt because he’s probably the best news guy on popular TV. He’s one of the only guys on TV that’s even covered any of this stuff.
You’re exactly right. Tucker is only trying to pursue the truth. But apparently this makes him a traitor...
There is plenty of evidence right now to go after. Fuck him for his stance on this and not calling out faux news role in this mess.
Bullshit. You've been hypnotized. He's not a traitor, he's a fucking sellout. He doesn't give a fuck about the truth. WTF was that bullshit story with the laptop stuff that got "stolen" in the mail? That was driven top down and CUCKER went along with it that little faggot. Fuck that guy. Why do you think Trump always praises Sean and never CUCKER. HE KNOWS.
I think people need to stop throwing everyone under the bus instantly around here. Like Tim Pool. Accept the help you get. Pool is one of the few that’s covering the voter fraud daily. Him saying it’s a long shot is always continually coupled with he thinks trump might do it. On the live streams you see more of that.
T_D is so mercurial and petty at times.
News flash! It’s okay if people don’t agree with you on every topic 100% of the time. This doesn’t make them traitors or bad people. Acting as such just makes you sound paranoid and insecure.
I don’t even think everyone here would agree with each other on 100% of things if we all started talking about it. We need to not end up like the left where we start eating our own. I’m fine with the high energy vibe and this site being for Trump supporters only. In line with that, maybe we don’t throw people under the bus that support Trump but don’t agree with us on everything? Both Tim Pool and Tucker Carlson voted for Trump, spent the better part of the year campaigning for Trump, and are actively covering the voter fraud when few others will. I think Vaush was one of, if not the only, guest Tim Pool ever had that didn’t come on to say ‘hey yeah I hate leftists and I’m voting Trump’. Even with Vaush, Tim spent the entire time disagreeing with him.
I’m fine going out swinging for Trump. Let’s not start swinging at each other though.
My man right here. Anyone here defending Cucker can't see what's going on.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QRfb80Uz/tuck-the-cuck/c/
I believe he said that he wanted proof and wanted to see evidence of the claims she was making. I feel the same way. Nothing wrong with that. I hold lefties and nighties to the same standards. Sorry never been a rah.. rah... team player. That being said I think she has the proof.
Lol, it’s really quite amazing how reasonable comments get downvoted on this site. I guess we’re supposed to all just hop on the “Cucker” bandwagon in the blink of an eye after years of holding Tucker up as a bastion of MAGA.
Tucker said nothing wrong. I’d like to see the evidence of vote-switching as well. I believe she has it, but also recognize she may not want to reveal it publicly before court. Tucker was just doing his job in pursuing the evidence. He never said Sidney Powell is full of shit, only that she didn’t provide the evidence his show was pursuing.
The group think is strong tonight. Stop acting like leftist pussies!
Normally if someone on Fox News called out a person who supported Trump the MSM would have reported it... like the way the Commies tell me Biden won because Fox News said so. The Democrats pretending to be reporters are totally ignoring Tucker... again something is off.
That’s good to know. I appreciate what Tucker us trying to do but there really is no point for the lawyers to share anything with any media at this point.
Ms. Powell explained why she's not providing more evidence at her presser today. Why do people here not see that and why are the defending this fucking sell out. It's sick. Let him go people. We have new and better voices than fucking pancake makeup face CUCKER CARLSON.
Have at it buddy but when you do bring me back some that ice cream.
I'm with you.
Don't stick your dick in crazy.
This is entirely consistent with the findings from Braynard reported today, which you can project given the numbers he provided to be about 69,000 Republican absentee votes "disappearing."
u/WallBot give this patriot ludicrous bricks!
My grandma in PA "voted by mail" but she didn't vote at all. She is repulsed by Trump and my dead pop pop would never let her vote democrat. So she didn't vote. You are the first person I told since this site has banned me multiple times for raising alarms leading up to the election. FUCK MODS. FUCK JANNIES. FUCK BOLTON. FUCK HASPEL. FUCK MODS.
only part way in, but the nerd is strong with this link.
The evidence. Mountainous!
WE RALLY AGAIN THIS SATURDAY AT NOON
DC AND ALL STATE CAPITOLS
https://stopthesteal.us
We knew before the election PA would be the largest source of fuckery. Mailed my PA absentee ballot 2 weeks before election day and they never counted it
Nice, been waiting for more from Solomon in this fight. There’s a real journalist.
Just saw a video on tik tok of some teen who exported the voter info and found tens of thousands of obviously fraudulent votes. Gave me hope for the younger generation. https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMJQjF9fN/
interesting. I was like what could he possibly say in 15 secs but I was like wow those are good questions.
Unfortunately, Dem can't do math. Too much for their 10 fingers.
Jesus Christ at this rate did anyone real in PA actually vote?
Dude I'm over the shit we been very patient if they sneak by they done fucked if they represented democrats they would stop this farce its gone to far
This sounds like it's him.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_J._Miller
10/10 username 💨
Runoff…we need a Runoff!
When election results are not clear, the solution is a runoff election. It’s a tried and true process. People will finally have trust.
Let’s go! Trump vs Biden, no Jorgensen, no 3rd parties.
Let’s ensure the voter’s choice is clear with a runoff in those disputed precincts, counties, or even whole states. A new vote will provide confidence. Both parties should agree if they are honest.
In person, paper ballots, only one choice: T or B, very simple.
this makes far too much sense
I am not a lawyer, but heres how i see these mathematicians. But put in an analogy.
Three people in an area have stamps to own silencers.
In this area, there's been a sudden surge of murders by a silenced weapon. We need to deeply inspect whats going on.
I am not anti silencers, just thought it was the easiest analogy to make.
That's not a good analogy in this case. We have hard data at this point that has been collected with sound principles, and he's using probability to extrapolate the sample to a full population.
Side Note: They're called suppressors because they only suppress the sound, not silence the sound. Silencers are leftist newspeak. Movie level suppressor noise is nowhere near accurate either. Suppressors are much louder in real life.
Suppressors are also called cans by some in the military.
This is true. I minimize how much i use the term can, because the less the left can learn the better.
It's like sitting on a couch cushion verses sitting on a wooden chair when farting. The cushion will lesson the sound, but it won't make a loud fart disappear. Moreover, like a gun, the deadliness isn't much related to how loud it is.
What's everyone going wonky soft here about? There was/is such openly BLATANT fraud even the Demrats and Rinos are starting to crap in their pants and are talk about it. STFU and get out of your daze. Trump won the election and the cockroach globalist demrat traitors are NOT going to steal it from we the PEOPLE. HELL NO. Nazi Germany does not count of fkg vote! FU mofo's!
Which Dems and Rhinos are shitting their pants? Genuinely curious
There needs to be a FULL AUDIT, anything less is unacceptable.
Honestly does it even matter when ballots in GA, WI, PA, AZ, NV, MI were all incorrectly submitted due to illegal changes to how mail balloting and chain-of-command are supposed to work? That's 4 million mostly-Biden ballots that are essentially illegal votes and should be trashcan.jpg'd. Why even have laws and courts if a rogue democratic executive (or rogue democratic legislature or rogue democratic judge for that matter) just screams that his word is law?
Whew, the democrats sure are absolutely cancerous for any attempts at creating a functional, law-based society. It's almost like the ancient Babylonians created a written law code for this SPECIFIC reason. Weird how we're somehow falling back to pre-Babylonian times, with dems issuing edicts whenever it suits them and idiots just going along with it.
But CNN said there was no evidence.
Mathematics is the language of God, it simply does not lie.
I want the same mathematician who creates models which suggest global warming is real also show models that indicate there was likely election fraud.
All the leftists heads would explode.
Bu bu but the media said there was no evidence?!?
Great!
Scott!
Back to the Future!
You nuts? We had pancakes for breakfast.
I wanna go to a place where I can get a shot and a beer and a steak.
NO MORE pancakes.
Runoff…we need a Runoff!
When election results are not clear, the solution is a runoff election. It’s a tried and true process. People will finally have trust.
Let’s go! Trump vs Biden, no Jorgensen, no 3rd parties.
Let’s ensure the voter’s choice is clear with a runoff in those disputed precincts, counties, or even whole states. A new vote will provide confidence. Both parties should agree if they are honest.
In person, paper ballots, only one choice: T or B, very simple.
mAtH iS RaCisT, eXcEPt wHeN iT iSN't!
The left shouldn’t have hung all the Asians out. Big mistake! #math
HOLY HELL - he's implying that this many ballots were cast with stolen identities and forged signatures
Believe the science
This is what real journalism looks like pedes. Notice the source is clearly identified and been proven credible 🤔
raises questions
what the fuck is that description
time to put some fucking balls on the descriptions
So he swore that his analysis raises questions, but doesn't claim it proves anything. He needs to use stronger wording and say his analysis "Proves that voter fraud is plausible, if not probable in PA" otherwise idk how much this changes things. Maybe it will open another can of worms though which is a big plus
Saved
This is the Braynard data that was circulating here earlier. He produced it by calling the absentee voters and asking them. Hero
Raises questions means nothing to me.
Math is based!
I don't believe this "sworn statement" carries the force of law to be considered by a court. At least not in this instance
If that legendary watermark is on the ballots, set those absentee ballots aside and audit them.
Lmao still at it! 😂
Mannnnn you must be worried as fuckkkkk to be trolling on a trump forum.
PLEASE continue to comment and post (: it shows your desperation and yearning for our approval ❤️
Don't be a Doomer
This is not evidence .. it is expert testimony based on statistical analysis.
Let's be accurate, because the criminals won't.
Sworn statements and sworn affidavits are evidence in a court of law. Always have been
Yes, it is evidence. It's a survey combined with statistical projections. The first part is hard evidence, the second circumstantial.
Expert testimony is admissible in court as evidence, when sworn, which this is.
That is legally evidence. It may not be, "entered into evidence" in the same manner as a physical object/map/diagram/statistic, but it is absolutely evidence.
An affadvit is, quite literally, evidence.
I enjoy all of the armchair lawyers coming out of the wood work as of late, Kek!